C.B. and Department of Homeland Security, U.S. Customs & Border Protection, San Diego, CA (Board decision, October 28, 2021)

Board dismisses C.B.'s appeal and late reconsideration petition (ECAB 21-1280)

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
21-1280, 20-1050
Decided
October 28, 2021
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-23

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2021, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board dismissed appeal 21-1280 because no recent final adverse OWCP decision was available for review. It also dismissed as late a reconsideration petition concerning its earlier order under docket 20-1050. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).

Plain-English summary

C.B. sought review of a purported May 2020 OWCP decision, but that document was an earlier Board order. The most recent final adverse OWCP decision was from 2015, outside the 180-day appeal period. The Board also treated the filing as a possible petition to reconsider its May 2020 order and found it outside the 30-day period. It dismissed both the new appeal and the reconsideration petition.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Board appeal deadline, 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
  • Outcome: Appeal 21-1280 and reconsideration in 20-1050 dismissed.
  • Key point: Neither filing was within the applicable review period.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
C.B., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket Nos. 21-1280 &
) 20-1050
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY, ) Issued: October 28, 2021
U.S. CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION,
)
San Diego, CA, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL IN DOCKET NO. 21-1280 AND DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION IN DOCKET NO. 20-1050

Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On August 24, 2021 appellant sought an appeal from a purported May 14, 2020 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards docketed the appeal as No. 21-1280.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that its jurisdiction is limited to the review of final adverse OWCP decisions issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act. 1 The case record as transmitted to the Board does not contain a final adverse decision of OWCP issued within 180 days from the date of docketing of the current appeal. 2 The most recent final adverse decision was issued by OWCP on October 6, 2015. By an order dated May 14, 2020, this Board dismissed an appeal from OWCP’s October 6, 2015 decision as untimely filed under Docket

1
5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a).
2
20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.” No. 20-1050.3 As there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 2 1-1280 must be dismissed.

Regarding whether appellant’s August 24, 2021 appeal may be construed as a timely petition for reconsideration of the Board’s May 14, 2020 order dismissing appeal in Docket No. 20-1050, the Board notes that its order became final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of issuance. 4 Further, as appellant did not file his disagreement with the Board ’s May 14, 2020 order until August 24, 2021, this submission may not be deemed as a timely petition for reconsideration as it was filed in excess of 30 days from the date of issuance of the Board’s order.5 Thus, the petition for reconsideration of the May 14, 2020 Board order must be dismissed as untimely filed. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-1280 is dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the petition for reconsideration in Docket No.
20-1050 is dismissed as untimely filed.

Issued: October 28, 2021
Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3
Docket No. 20-1050 (issued May 14, 2020).
4
20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
5
See id. at § 501.7(a).

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace