C.G. and Department of the Navy, Philadelphia Naval Shipyard, Philadelphia, PA (Board decision, May 10, 2023)

Board reverses suspension of Navy worker wage loss compensation (ECAB 21-0895)

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
21-0895
Decided
May 10, 2023
Outcome
Vacated
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-11

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2023, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board reversed OWCP's March 15, 2021 decision maintaining the suspension of C.G.'s wage loss compensation and directed reinstatement of appropriate benefits retroactive to February 1, 2020. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless the order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).

Plain-English summary

A former Navy shipyard laborer missed OWCP’s deadline to submit a requested EN-1032 financial disclosure form, and OWCP suspended his wage loss compensation. He later submitted the completed form, but OWCP maintained the suspension. The Board held that OWCP should have reinstated appropriate compensation retroactive to the date of suspension once he complied. It reversed OWCP’s decision.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: FECA wage loss reporting and reinstatement, 5 U.S.C. § 8106(b); 20 C.F.R. § 10.528.
  • Outcome: Continued suspension reversed; appropriate compensation to be reinstated retroactively.
  • Key point: Submission of the requested EN-1032 after suspension can require retroactive reinstatement of compensation.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
C.G., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 21-0895
)
Issued: May 10, 2023
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY,
)
PHILADELPHIA NAVAL SHIPYARD,
)
Philadelphia, PA, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge

JURISDICTION

On April 26, 2021 appellant filed a timely appeal from a March 15, 2021 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees Compensation Act1 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits of the case.

ISSUE

The issue is whether OWCP properly suspended appellant’s wage-loss compensation benefits, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8123(d), effective February 1, 2020, for failure to submit the EN-1032 form as requested.

1
5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
FACTUAL HISTORY

On December 20, 1983 appellant, then a 33-year-old laborer, filed a traumatic injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that, on that date, he slipped on a piece of wood and injured his left shoulder. OWCP accepted the claim for dislocation of the left shoulder. It paid appellant wage-loss compensation on the periodic rolls as of June 16, 2002.

OWCP periodically requested that appellant submit financial disclosure statements (Form EN-1032) which solicited information about his employment, volunteer work, dependent(s) status, receipt of other federal benefits and/or payments, and third -party settlements.

On November 30, 2018 OWCP received an incomplete Form EN-1032 from appellant.

On February 13, 2019 OWCP notified appellant that his Form EN-1032 received on November 30, 2018 was incomplete, as he had not properly completed questions 1 and 3, and indicated that additional information was required. It advised that he was required to fully answer all questions on the EN-1032 form and return it within 30 days or his benefits would be suspended pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 10.528. OWCP mailed the form to appellant’s last known address of record. No response was received.

By decision dated January 29, 2020, OWCP suspended appellant’s wage-loss compensation benefits, effective February 1, 2020, for failure to submit the EN-1032 form as requested. It noted that he had not responded to its February 13, 2019 letter. OWCP advised that, if appellant fully completed and returned an enclosed copy of the EN-1032 form, it would restore his wage-loss compensation benefits retroactive to the date of suspension.

On March 9, 2020 appellant requested reconsideration. He included a copy of his completed Form EN-1032.

On October 6, 2020 appellant submitted his pay stubs from 2018 and 2019.

By decision dated March 15, 2021, OWCP denied modification of the January 29, 2020 suspension of appellant’s compensation benefits.

LEGAL PRECEDENT

Section 8106(b) of FECA 2 authorizes the Secretary of Labor to require a partially disabled employee to report his or her earnings from employment or self-employment, by affidavit or otherwise, in the manner and at the times the Secretary specifies. 3

Under section 10.528 of OWCP’s implementing federal regulations, an employee in receipt of compensation benefits must complete an affidavit as to any work or activity indicating an ability

2
Id.
3
5 U.S.C. § 8106(b).

2 to work, which the employee has performed for the prior 15 months. 4 If an employee who is required to file such a report fails to do so within 30 days of the date of the request, his or her right to compensation for wage loss is suspended until OWCP receives the requested report. At that time, OWCP will reinstate compensation retroactive to the date of suspension if the employee remains entitled to compensation. 5

ANALYSIS

The Board finds that OWCP improperly suspended appellant’s wage-loss compensation benefits, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8123(d), effective February 1, 2020.

In a February 13, 2019 letter mailed to appellant’s address of record, OWCP informed him that he needed to complete, sign, and return a Form EN-1032, and that failure to return the requested document within 30 days would lead to the suspension of his compensation benefits. By decision dated January 29, 2020, it suspended his wage-loss compensation benefits, effective February 1, 2020, for failure to submit the EN-1032 form as requested. OWCP advised that, if appellant fully completed and returned an enclosed copy of the EN-1032 form, it would restore his wage-loss compensation benefits retroactive to the date of suspension. Appellant returned a completed Form EN-1032 that was received by OWCP with his request for reconsideration on March 9, 2020. OWCP, however, in its March 15, 2021 decision, denied modification of the January 29, 2020 suspension decision.

Although appellant did not submit the form within 30 days of OWCP’s February 13, 2019 letter, he subsequently responded and complied with its instructions to fully complete the EN-1032 form. OWCP should have reinstated his compensation retroactive to the effective date of suspension, which in this case was February 1, 2020.6 The Board thus finds that OWCP’s March 15, 2021 denial of modification is erroneous, and the suspension of appellant’s compensation benefits was improper.7 The case will be remanded to OWCP for reinstatement of appropriate compensation benefits.

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP improperly suspended appellant’s wage-loss compensation benefits, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8123(d), effective February 1, 2020.

4
20 C.F.R. § 10.528; see also R.B., Docket No. 20-0176 (issued June 25, 2020); A.H., Docket No. 15-241 (issued April 3, 2015). 5 Id.
6
Id.
7
See C.S., Docket No. 19-0331 (issued May 24, 2019); S.F., Docket No. 12-1821 (issued January 25, 2013); H.A., Docket No. 11-1192 (issued May 24, 2012); W.F., Docket No. 11-0877 (issued March 9, 2012).

3
ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the March 15, 2021 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is reversed.

Issued: May 10, 2023
Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace