D.H. and U.S. Postal Service, Processing and Distribution Center, Philadelphia, PA (Board decision, November 1, 2021)
D.H. (ECAB 21-0577 and 21-0867): Left shoulder claims returned for combined review
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2021, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside OWCP’s January 11 and February 24, 2021 decisions and directed it to combine two related claim files and issue new decisions. The claims remain unresolved. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).
Plain-English summary
A postal worker had an accepted 2017 injury involving his left shoulder and filed a later claim for shoulder symptoms he attributed to repeated pushing and pulling at work. OWCP denied the newer claim for lack of a medical diagnosis tied to the work factors, and issued a separate decision on the earlier claim. The Board found that both files concerned the left shoulder and should be reviewed together. It set aside the January and February 2021 decisions and directed OWCP to combine the records and issue new decisions.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: OWCP file-combination procedures cited in the order.
- Outcome: January 11 and February 24, 2021 decisions set aside; both shoulder claims returned for new decisions.
- Key point: The related left shoulder files needed to be combined before OWCP decided either claim.
Full text (ECAB public release)
United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
________
)
D.H., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket Nos. 21-0577 and 21-
) 0867
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE,PROCESSING AND ) Issued: November 1, 2021
DISTRIBUTION CENTER, Philadelphia, PA,
)
Employer
)
__________ )
Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Russell T. Uliase, Esq., for the appellant1
Office of Solicitor, for the Director
ORDER REMANDING CASES
Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge
On March 3, 2021 appellant, through counsel, filed a timely appeal from a January 11, 2021 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) under OWCP File No. xxxxxx261. The Clerk of the Appellate Boards docketed the appeal as No. 21-0577. On May 20, 2021 appellant, through counsel, filed a timely appeal from a February 24, 2021 merit decision of OWCP dated under OWCP File No. xxxxxx096. The Clerk of the Appellate Boards docketed the appeal as No. 21-0867.
Under OWCP File No. xxxxxx261, appellant, then a 62-year-old mail handler equipment operator, filed an occupational disease claim (Form CA-2) on December 3, 2020 alleging that he sustained an unspecified shoulder injury due to factors of his federal employment, including
1
In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation. extensive pushing and pulling and movement of his arms and head to move containers and skids and steer handles. He noted that he first became aware of his condition on September 28, 2019 and its relationship to his federal employment on December 14, 2019. By decision dated January 11, 2021, denied appellant’s occupational disease claim, finding that the medical evidence of record did not contain a medical diagnosis in connection with the accepted factors of his federal employment. Consequently, it found that he had not met the requirements to establish an injury as defined by FECA.
Under OWCP File No. xxxxxx096, appellant previously filed a traumatic injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on December 12, 2017 he sustained a left upper back strain as a result of pushing and pulling bulk mail containers and all-purpose containers while in the performance of duty. On June 1, 2018 accepted that claim for left thoracic sprain and left upper arm and shoulder strains.
The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that both cases are not in posture for decision. OWCP’s procedures provide that cases should be administratively combined when correct adjudication of the issues depends on frequent cross-referencing between files or when two or more injuries occur to the same part of the body. 2 As both OWCP File Nos. xxxxxx096 and xxxxxx261 allege injuries to appellant’s left shoulder, for a full and fair adjudication, the Board finds that both cases must be returned to OWCP to administratively combine the case records. This will allow OWCP to consider all relevant claim files in adjudicating appellant’s claims.3 Following this and other such further development as OWCP deems necessary, it shall issue a de novo decision in each of appellant’s claims.
2
Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, File Maintenance and Management, Chapter 2.400.8(c) (February 2000).
3
Order Remanding Case, C.W., Docket Nos. 18-1764 and 19-0709 (issued August 27, 2020); Order Remanding Case, P.G., Docket No. 17-1461 (issued February 7, 2019).
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the January 11 and February 24, 2021 decisions of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs are set aside and the cases are remanded to OWCP for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board.
Issued: November 1, 2021
Washington, DC
Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
3
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace