D.W. and Department of the Navy, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, VA (Board decision, May 12, 2021)
Board dismisses late appeal of Navy shipyard worker's decision (ECAB 21-0337)
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2021, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
ECAB final decision. The Board dismissed the appeal as untimely, without reviewing OWCP's underlying decision. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).
Plain-English summary
D.W. appealed an OWCP decision dated March 28, 2017. The Board calculated the 180-day deadline as September 24, 2017, but D.W. filed on January 12, 2021. The appeal form referred to a purported December 2020 decision, but the case record contained no decision from that date. The Board found no documented compelling reason for the late filing and dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: The 180-day appeal deadline in 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
- Outcome: Appeal dismissed as untimely; underlying OWCP decision not reviewed.
- Key point: The decision of record was from March 2017, well outside the appeal period.
Full text (ECAB public release)
United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
________
)
D.W., Appellant
)
) Docket No. 21-0337
and ) Issued: May 12, 2021
)
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NORFOLK
)
NAVAL SHIPYARD, Portsmouth, VA, Employer
)
__________ )
Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge
On January 12, 2021 appellant filed an appeal from a March 28, 2017 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP).1 The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 21-0337.
The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.2 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s decision.3
The 180th day following the March 28, 2017 decision was September 24, 2017. As appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until January 12, 2021, more than 180 days after
1
The Board notes that appellant’s application for review (Form AB-1) requests an appeal from a purported December 9, 2020 decision. The case record as transmitted to the Board, however, does not contain a decision of that date. The last OWCP decision of record was the March 28, 2017 decision. 2 5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).
3
Id. at § 501.3(e). the March 28, 2017 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0337 is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered a reason to explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish compelling circumstances.
The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.”4
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0337 is dismissed.
Issued: May 12, 2021
Washington, DC
Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
4
Id. at § 501.6(d).
2
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace