E.G. and U.S. Postal Service, Margaret L. Sellers Processing & Distribution Center, San Diego, CA (Board decision, December 17, 2020)

E.G. and U.S. Postal Service, Margaret L. Sellers Processing & Distribution Center, San Diego, CA (ECAB 21-0203): Late appeal dismissed

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
21-0203
Decided
December 17, 2020
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-24

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2020, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2020
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board dismissed appeal No. 21-0203 as untimely, without reviewing the underlying OWCP decision. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

21-0203 was an appeal from OWCP’s May 20, 2020 decision. The appeal was filed on November 19, 2020, outside the 180-day review period. The filing came three days after the November 16 deadline, and E.G. provided no documented compelling circumstances. The Board dismissed the appeal for lack of jurisdiction and did not reach the merits.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: ECAB 180-day filing limit, 20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e).
  • Outcome: Appeal dismissed as untimely; underlying merits not reviewed.
  • Key point: The Board lacked jurisdiction after the appeal deadline passed.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
E.G., Appellant ) Docket No. 21-0203
) Issued: December 17, 2020
and
)
)
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, MARGARET L.
)
SELLERS PROCESSING & DISTRIBUTION
)
CENTER, San Diego, CA, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL

Before:
CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Deputy Chief Judge JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On November 19, 2020 appellant filed an appeal from a May 20, 2020 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 21-0203.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the Board has jurisdiction to review final adverse decisions of OWCP issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 For final adverse decisions of OWCP issued on or after November 19, 2008, the Board’s review authority is limited to appeals which are filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of OWCP’s decision.2

The 180th day following the May 20, 2020 decision was November 16, 2020. As appellant did not file an appeal with the Board until November 19, 2020, more than 180 days after the May 20, 2020 OWCP decision, the Board finds that the appeal docketed as No. 21-0203 is untimely filed. The Board is without jurisdiction to review the appeal. Appellant has not offered

1
5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(a) (2009).
2
Id. at § 501.3(e). a reason to explain the failure to timely file an appeal with supporting documentation sufficient to establish compelling circumstances.

The Board’s decisions and orders are “final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of their issuance.”3

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 21-0203 is dismissed.

Issued: December 17, 2020
Washington, DC

Christopher J. Godfrey, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3
Id. at § 501.6(d).

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace