D.B. and U.S. Postal Service, Post Office, Elmhurst, IL (Board decision, December 17, 2020)
D.B. and U.S. Postal Service, Post Office, Elmhurst, IL (ECAB 21-0075): Appeal dismissed at claimant’s request
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2020, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
ECAB final decision. The Board granted the request to dismiss appeal No. 21-0075. It did not review the underlying OWCP decision. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).
Plain-English summary
21-0075 was an appeal from OWCP’s September 24, 2020 decision. The appeal was filed on October 23, 2020. Counsel asked the Board in December to dismiss the timely appeal; the Board granted that request. The Board made no ruling on the merits of the underlying claim.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: ECAB dismissal of an appeal at the appellant’s request.
- Outcome: Appeal voluntarily dismissed; underlying merits not reviewed.
- Key point: The Board granted the request to withdraw the appeal.
Full text (ECAB public release)
United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
________
)
D.B., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 21-0075
) Issued: December 17, 2020
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,
)
Elmhurst, IL, Employer
)
_________ )
Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Alan J. Shapiro, Esq., for the appellant1
Office of Solicitor, for the Director
ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL
Before:
CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Deputy Chief Judge PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge
On October 23, 2020 appellant, through counsel, filed a timely appeal from a September 24, 2020 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 21-0075.
In a letter dated and received December 9, 2020, counsel requested that the appeal be dismissed.
The Board has duly considered the matter and concludes that counsel’s request for the dismissal of the appeal should be granted. Accordingly,
1
In all cases in which a representative has been authorized in a matter before the Board, no claim for a fee for legal or other service performed on appeal before the Board is valid unless approved by the Board. 20 C.F.R. § 501.9(e). No contract for a stipulated fee or on a contingent fee basis will be approved by the Board. Id. An attorney or representative’s collection of a fee without the Board’s approval may constitute a misdemeanor, subject to fine or imprisonment for up to one year or both. Id.; see also 18 U.S.C. § 292. Demands for payment of fees to a representative, prior to approval by the Board, may be reported to appropriate authorities for investigation. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT appellant’s request for the dismissal of the appeal is granted. The appeal docketed as No. 21-0075 is dismissed.
Issued: December 17, 2020
Washington, DC
Christopher J. Godfrey, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
2
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace