R.W. and Department of Veterans Affairs, Veterans Administration Medical Center, San Diego, CA (Board decision, March 1, 2021)

Board dismisses appeal and late reconsideration petition (ECAB 20-1150)

Decision type
Board decision
Dockets
20-1150, 19-1109
Decided
March 1, 2021
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-24

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2021, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board dismissed R.W.’s appeal and late reconsideration petition without deciding entitlement to compensation. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

R.W. filed an appeal in April 2020, but the Board found no final adverse OWCP decision issued within the required 180 days. The Board had already set aside the last OWCP decision in a separate appeal. It also found that R.W.’s filing came too late to seek reconsideration of that earlier Board decision. It dismissed both the new appeal and the reconsideration petition.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, 5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
  • Outcome: Docket 20-1150 appeal dismissed; docket 19-1109 reconsideration petition dismissed as late.
  • Key point: There was no recent appealable OWCP decision, and the Board reconsideration window had expired.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
R.W., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 20-1150 &
) 19-1109
DEPARTMENT OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, ) Issued: March 1, 2021
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION MEDICAL
)
CENTER, San Diego, CA, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER DISMISSING APPEAL IN DOCKET NO. 20-1150 AND DISMISSING PETITION FOR RECONSIDERATION IN DOCKET NO. 19-1109

Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

On April 30, 2020 appellant sought appeal from a purported April 17, 2020 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned Docket No. 20-1150.

The Board, having duly considered the matter, notes that its jurisdiction is limited to the review of final adverse OWCP decisions issued under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act.1 This jurisdiction encompasses any final decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the date appellant filed his appeal.2 As of the filing of the current appeal, the most recent OWCP decision was dated February 15, 2019. However, by a January 2, 2020 decision in Docket No. 19-1109, the Board set aside OWCP’s February 15, 2019 decision, finding that OWCP should further

1
5 U.S.C. § 8149; 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3(e).
2
20 C.F.R. § 501.3(e) provides in pertinent part: “Any notice of appeal must be filed within 180 days from the date of issuance of a decision of the OWCP.” develop the medical evidence pertaining to appellant’s schedule award claim.3 As there is no final adverse decision issued by OWCP within 180 days of the filing of this appeal over which the Board may properly exercise jurisdiction, the Board concludes that the appeal docketed as No. 20-1150 must be dismissed.

To the extent that appellant’s appeal may be construed as a timely petition for reconsideration of the Board’s decision in Docket No. 19-1109, the Board notes that its decision became final upon the expiration of 30 days from the date of issuance.4 As appellant did not file his disagreement with the Board’s decision until April 30, 2020, this submission may not be deemed as a timely petition for reconsideration as it was filed in excess of 30 days from the date of issuance.5 Thus, the petition for reconsideration of the Board decision must be dismissed as untimely filed. Accordingly,

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the appeal docketed as No. 20-1150 is dismissed.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED THAT the petition for reconsideration in Docket No.
19-1109 is dismissed as untimely filed.

Issued: March 1, 2021
Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

3
Docket No. 19-1109 (issued January 2, 2020).
4
20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d).
5
See id. at § 501.7(a).

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace