S.H. and Department of Homeland Security, Customs and Border Protection, San Diego, CA (Board decision, June 23, 2020)

S.H. and Customs and Border Protection (ECAB 19-1876): Benefits suspension for missing disclosure form upheld

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
19-1876
Decided
June 23, 2020
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-24

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2020, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2020
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board affirmed OWCP's August 28, 2019 decision. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).

Plain-English summary

S.H., a customs and border protection officer, received wage-loss compensation for an accepted work injury. OWCP mailed her an EN1032 form asking for employment and earnings information and warned that benefits would be suspended if she did not return it within 30 days. The Board found that the form went to her last known address and that she did not submit it on time. It affirmed OWCP's suspension of wage-loss compensation effective August 28, 2019, under 20 C.F.R. § 10.528.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: FECA earnings-disclosure duty, 20 C.F.R. § 10.528.
  • Outcome: OWCP’s August 28, 2019 suspension decision affirmed; wage-loss compensation suspended for failure to submit the form.
  • Key point: A properly mailed EN1032 request required a timely completed response to avoid suspension.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
S.H., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 19-1876
) Issued: June 23, 2020
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY,
)
CUSTOMS & BORDER PROTECTION,
)
San Diego, CA, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:
JANICE B. ASKIN, Judge
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge
VALERIE D. EVANS-HARRELL, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On September 9, 2019 appellant filed a timely appeal from an August 28, 2019 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act1 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.2

1
5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
2
The Board notes that, following the August 28, 2019 decision, OWCP received additional evidence. However, the Board’s Rules of Procedure provides: “The Board’s review of a case is limited to the evidence in the case record that was before OWCP at the time of its final decision. Evidence not before OWCP will not be considered by the Board for the first time on appeal.” 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). Thus, the Board is precluded from reviewing this additional evidence for the first time on appeal. Id. ISSUE

The issue is whether OWCP properly suspended appellant’s wage-loss compensation benefits, effective August 28, 2019, for failure to complete an EN1032 form as requested.

FACTUAL HISTORY

On October 29, 2007 appellant, then a 53-year-old customs and border protection officer, filed a traumatic injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that on October 20, 2007 she injured her knees while running on a track while in the performance of duty. OWCP accepted her claim for bilateral enthesopathy of the knee and other bilateral disorders of the muscle, ligament, and fascia. It later expanded acceptance of the claim to include bilateral lateral collateral ligament strains of the knees, bilateral localized primary osteoarthritis of the knees, and bilateral chondromalacia patellae. Appellant underwent an OWCP-authorized left knee arthroscopy, synovectomy, and chondroplasty on April 24, 2008 and an authorized left knee arthroscopic partial chondroplasty in the patellofemoral compartment and debridement of arthrofibrotic scarring on July 24, 2008. She was removed from her position as of July 12, 2009 for inability to perform essential duties of her position. OWCP paid appellant wage-loss compensation on the periodic rolls as of August 30, 2019.

By Form CA-1032 dated May 13, 2019, OWCP informed appellant that federal regulations required her to report any improvement in her medical condition, any employment, any change in the status of claimed dependents, any third-party settlement, and any income or change in income from federally-assisted disability or benefit programs. It notified her that she was required to fully answer all questions on the enclosed EN1032 form and return it within 30 days or her benefits would be suspended. The letter was mailed to appellant’s last known address. However, no response was received by appellant.

By decision dated August 28, 2019, OWCP suspended appellant’s compensation benefits, effective on that date, for failing to complete the EN1032 form as requested. It noted that, if she completed and returned an enclosed copy of the form, her compensation benefits would be restored retroactively to the date they were suspended.

LEGAL PRECEDENT

Section 8106(b) of FECA authorizes the Secretary of Labor to require a partially disabled employee to report his or her earnings from employment or self-employment, by affidavit or otherwise, in the manner and at the times the Secretary specifies.3

Under section 10.528 of OWCP’s implementing federal regulations, an employee in receipt of compensation benefits must complete an affidavit as to any work or activity indicating an ability

3
5 U.S.C. § 8106(b).

2 to work, which the employee has performed for the prior 15 months.4 If an employee who is required to file such a report fails to do so within 30 days of the date of the request, his or her right to compensation for wage loss is suspended until OWCP receives the requested report. At that time, OWCP will reinstate compensation retroactive to the date of suspension if the employee remains entitled to compensation.5

ANALYSIS

The Board finds that OWCP properly suspended appellant’s wage-loss compensation benefits, effective August 28, 2019, for failure to complete an EN1032 form as requested.

On May 13, 2019 OWCP provided appellant with an EN1032 form. It properly advised her that, if she did not completely answer all of the questions and return the statement within 30 days, her benefits would be suspended, until the form was received. The record reflects that OWCP’s letter was properly sent to appellant’s last known address and there is no indication that it was returned as undeliverable.6 Under the mailbox rule, a document mailed in the ordinary course of the sender’s business practices to the addressee’s last known address is presumed to be received by the addressee.

The record indicates that appellant failed to timely submit the EN1032 form within 30 days of OWCP’s request. Appellant was receiving wage-loss compensation and she was, therefore, required to complete the EN1032 form. Her failure to file an EN1032 form prior to August 28, 2019 resulted in the suspension of compensation. Thus, the Board finds that OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation benefits, effective August 28, 2019, pursuant to 20 C.F.R.
§ 10.528.

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP properly suspended appellant’s wage-loss compensation benefits, effective August 28, 2019, for failure to complete an EN1032 form as requested.

4
20 C.F.R. § 10.528. See also H.B., Docket No. 19-0405 (issued June 26, 2019); M.S., Docket No. 18-1107 (issued December 28, 2018); C.C., Docket No. 17-0043 (issued June 15, 2018); A.H., Docket No. 15-0241 (issued April 3, 2015). 5 Id.; see also id. at § 10.525.
6
See H.B., supra note 4; Kenneth E. Harris, 54 ECAB 502, 505 (2003); J.J., Docket No. 13-1067 (issued September 20, 2013).

3
ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the August 28, 2019 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is affirmed.

Issued: June 23, 2020
Washington, DC

Janice B. Askin, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Valerie D. Evans-Harrell, Alternate Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace