W.B. and Department of Interior, Redwood National Park, Orick, CA (Board decision, May 22, 2020)

W.B. and Department of Interior, Redwood National Park, Orick, CA (ECAB 19-1444): Claim returned because employee was not served

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
19-1444
Decided
May 22, 2020
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-24

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2020, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2020
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside OWCP’s May 9, 2019 decision and remanded the case. OWCP must properly serve claim documents and develop the claim. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

W.B. claimed injuries from a basketball game held on a workday evening. The Board found that the record did not show proper service of documents used to develop and adjudicate his claim. It set aside OWCP’s decision and directed proper claim development and service before a new decision.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Proper service of claim development and adjudication documents.
  • Outcome: May 9, 2019 decision set aside and remanded.
  • Key point: A claim could not be adjudicated without proper service of the development materials.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
W.B., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 19-1444
) Issued: May 22, 2020
DEPARTMENT OF INTERIOR, REDWOOD
)
NATIONAL PARK, Orick, CA, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER REMANDING CASE

Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Chief Judge
CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Deputy Chief Judge PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Alternate Judge

On June 17, 2019 appellant filed a timely appeal from a May 9, 2019 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). The Clerk of the Appellate Boards assigned the appeal Docket 19-1444.

On August 1, 2018 appellant, then a 26-year-old forestry aid, filed a traumatic injury claim (Form CA-1) alleging that in August 2010 he sustained multiple injuries while playing in a basketball game scheduled on a regular workday evening while in the performance of duty. The record as presented to the Board establishes that appellant has not been properly served with any documents in the development or adjudication of his claim. Therefore, the case shall be remanded for proper claim development and service of all documentation regarding the adjudication of the claim.

Accordingly, the May 9, 2019 decision shall be set aside and the case remanded for further development to provide appellant an opportunity to cure the deficiencies in his claim.1 Following this and any other such further development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue a de novo decision.

1
See G.A., Docket No. 18-0266 (issued February 25, 2019).
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the May 9, 2019 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is set aside and the case is remanded for further action consistent with this order of the Board.

Issued: May 22, 2020
Washington, DC

Alec J. Koromilas, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Christopher J. Godfrey, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace