Ovation Plumbing, Inc. (Commission decision, December 20, 2018)

Case remanded for settlement review

Decision type
Commission decision
Docket
17-0196
Decided
December 20, 2018
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Commission precedent
Checked against source
2026-07-21
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Commission precedent from 2018, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2018
The OSHA standards may have been amended, penalty amounts have been adjusted, and later Commission or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current compliance advice. Verify the current standard before relying on any specific rule, threshold, or penalty mentioned here.
Decision of the Commission
This is a decision of the Occupational Safety and Health Review Commission, the highest level of agency review, citable as Commission precedent. It may have been appealed to a U.S. Court of Appeals after issuance; check subsequent history before relying on it. The full text below is from the official OSHRC release.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official OSHRC release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (oshrc.gov)

Plain-English summary

An administrative law judge had affirmed a fall-protection violation and assessed a $1,000 penalty, and that decision became a final Commission order. Ovation Plumbing petitioned the Tenth Circuit for review. The court granted the parties’ joint request for a limited remand so their settlement could be considered. The Commission returned the case to the judge to review the settlement agreement and any objections under Commission Rule 100.

Decision snapshot

  • Cited standard(s): 29 C.F.R. § 1926.501(b)(1)
  • Outcome: Case remanded to the administrative law judge for review of the parties’ settlement.
  • Key point: A court-ordered limited remand allows the Commission’s judge to consider a settlement reached after the original final order.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Bailey, Ronald G.
Normal
OChair
7
14
2018-12-21T15:22:00Z
2018-12-21T15:23:00Z
2018-12-21T15:35:00Z
2
191
1091
9
2
1280
16.00

Print
Clean
Clean
false

false
false
false

EN-US
X-NONE
X-NONE

United
States of America

OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH
REVIEW COMMISSION

1120
20 th Street, N.W., Ninth Floor

Washington,
DC � 20036-3457

SECRETARY OF
LABOR

����������������������������������������������� Complainant

����������������������������������� v.

OVATION PLUMBING,
INC.

����������������������������������������������� Respondent.

OSHRC Docket No. 17-0196

REMAND
ORDER

Before: �
MacDOUGALL ,
Chairman; ATTWOOD and SULLIVAN, Commissioners.

BY THE COMMISSION:

In an April 17, 2018
Decision and Order, Administrative Law Judge Brian A. Duncan affirmed a violation of 29 C.F.R. � 1926.501(b)(1) and assessed a penalty of $1,000. � The decision became a final order of the Commission on May 18, 2018. � Respondent subsequently filed a petition for review with the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. � On November 20, 2018, the court issued an order granting the parties� Joint Motion for a Remand and remanding the matter to the Commission �for the limited purpose of considering the parties� settlement.� �

The Commission now remands
the matter to Administrative Law Judge Brian A. Duncan to review the settlement agreement and consider any objections pursuant to Commission Rule 100, 29 C.F.R. � 2200.100.

SO
ORDERED.

/s/ ��������������������������������������������������������

Heather
L. MacDougall

Chairman ��������������������

/s/ ��������������������������������������������������������

Cynthia
L. Attwood

Commissioner

/s/ ��������������������������������������������������������

James
J. Sullivan, Jr.

Dated: December 20, 2018 ���������������������������������������� Commissioner

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace