I.A. and Department of Justice, Bureau of Prisons, Brooklyn, NY (Board decision, November 4, 2015)

I.A. (ECAB 15-1168): Incomplete earnings affidavit justified benefit suspension

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
15-1168
Decided
November 4, 2015
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-26

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2015, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2015
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board affirmed OWCP’s March 2, 2015 decision suspending I.A.’s wage-loss compensation effective March 8, 2015. Benefits can be reinstated retroactively when OWCP receives a fully completed earnings affidavit and she remains entitled to compensation. Under 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d), this Board decision becomes final 30 days after issuance unless the Board fixed a different period in it. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).

Plain-English summary

I.A., a Bureau of Prisons correctional treatment specialist with an accepted cervical strain, received continuing wage-loss benefits. OWCP asked her to complete an earnings and activity affidavit. She returned a form with two questions unanswered, and OWCP sent another form with a warning that benefits would be suspended if she did not complete it. The Board found that the record showed no completed response and affirmed the suspension. It explained that compensation could be restored retroactively once OWCP receives the completed form, if she remains eligible.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 8106(b); 20 C.F.R. § 10.528.
  • Outcome: March 2, 2015 decision suspending wage-loss benefits effective March 8 affirmed.
  • Key point: Returning an affidavit with required questions unanswered did not satisfy OWCP’s reporting request.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
I.A., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 15-1168
) Issued: November 4, 2015
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, BUREAU OF
)
PRISONS, Brooklyn, NY, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:
CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Chief Judge
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On April 28, 2015 appellant filed a timely appeal from a March 2, 2015 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act1 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.2

ISSUE

The issue is whether OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation benefits effective March 8, 2015 for failure to complete a Form CA-1032 as requested.

On appeal appellant contends that she may have submitted her paperwork to the wrong place.
1
5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
2
The Board notes that, following the issuance of the March 2, 2015 OWCP decision, appellant submitted new evidence. The Board is precluded from reviewing evidence which was not before OWCP at the time it issued its final decision. See 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). FACTUAL HISTORY

OWCP accepted that on June 27, 2002 appellant, then a 35-year-old correctional treatment specialist, suffered a cervical strain and received FECA benefits. Appellant was eventually retained on the periodic compensation rolls.

In a September 8, 2014 letter, OWCP informed appellant that federal regulations required her to make an affidavit relative to any earnings or employment during the previous year and that a Form CA-1032 was enclosed for that purpose. It notified her that she had to fully answer all questions on the form and return the statement within 30 days or her benefits would be suspended. The letter was mailed to appellant’s address of record.

On November 6, 2014 OWCP received from appellant a Form CA-1032 dated November 1, 2014. Questions 1a and 2a of Part D were incomplete.

OWCP sent appellant another Form CA-1032 on December 1, 2014 with another 30 days to fully complete and return the enclosed form. It advised that failure to submit the fully completed Form CA-1032 within the requested time frame would result in her compensation benefits being formally suspended until such time the form is submitted. No response was received.

By decision dated March 2, 2015, OWCP suspended appellant’s compensation benefits effective March 8, 2015 for failing to complete a Form CA-1032 as requested. It noted that, if she completed and returned an enclosed copy of the form, her compensation benefits would be restored retroactively to the date they were suspended.

LEGAL PRECEDENT

FECA authorizes the Secretary of Labor to require a partially disabled employee to report her earnings from employment or self-employment, by affidavit or otherwise, in the manner and at the times the Secretary specifies.3

Under section 10.528 of OWCP’s implementing federal regulations, an employee in receipt of compensation benefits must complete an affidavit as to any work or activity indicating an ability to work which the employee has performed for the prior 15 months.4 If an employee who is required to file such a report fails to do so within 30 days of the date of the request, his or her right to compensation for wage loss is suspended until OWCP receives the requested report. At that time, OWCP will reinstate compensation retroactive to the date of suspension if the employee remains entitled to compensation.5

3
5 U.S.C. § 8106(b).
4
20 C.F.R. § 10.528. See also A.H., Docket No. 15-241 (issued April 3, 2015).
5
Id.; see also 20 C.F.R. § 10.525.

2
ANALYSIS

The Board finds that OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation benefits effective March 8, 2015 for failure to complete a Form CA-1032 as requested.

On September 8, 2014 OWCP provided appellant with a Form CA-1032. It notified her that federal regulations required her to complete the form and answer all questions concerning her employment or earnings. OWCP properly notified her that, if she did not completely answer all questions and return the statement within 30 days, her benefits would be suspended. The record reflects that OWCP’s letter was properly sent to appellant’s address of record.6 Under the mailbox rule, a document mailed in the ordinary course of the sender’s business practices to the addressee’s last known address is presumed to be received by the addressee.

The record shows that appellant submitted a Form CA-1032 dated November 1, 2014.
However, Questions 1a and 2a of Part D were incomplete. Based on the evidence of record, the Board therefore finds that OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation benefits effective March 8, 2015 pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 10.528.7

On appeal appellant contends that she may have submitted her paperwork to the wrong place. As noted, her benefits will be retroactively reinstated when she fully completes and submits the Form CA-1032 to OWCP, as mandated by law.

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation benefits effective March 8, 2015 for failure to complete a Form CA-1032 as requested.

6
See Kenneth E. Harris, 54 ECAB 502, 505 (2003); J.J., Docket No. 13-1067 (issued September 20, 2013).
7
See M.W., Docket No. 15-0507 (issued June 18, 2015). See also James A. Igo, 49 ECAB 189 (1997).

3
ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the March 2, 2015 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is affirmed.

Issued: November 4, 2015
Washington, DC

Christopher J. Godfrey, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Alec J. Koromilas, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace