I.S. and Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Civil Rights, Dallas, TX (Board decision, July 7, 2015)

I.S. (ECAB 15-0800): Compensation suspension for missing report upheld

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
15-0800
Decided
July 7, 2015
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-27

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2015, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2015
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision on a reporting suspension. The Board affirmed OWCP’s November 6, 2014 decision suspending I.S.’s wage-loss benefits effective November 16, 2014. Under 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d), this Board decision becomes final 30 days after issuance unless the Board fixed a different period in it. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days unless this decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

I.S. received wage-loss compensation for an accepted emotional condition. OWCP asked her to report work and other activity on an EN1032 form within 30 days and warned that nonresponse would suspend her benefits. She did not return the form within that period. The Board held that OWCP properly suspended compensation under the reporting rule. It noted that OWCP would restore benefits retroactively once she supplied the information if she remained entitled to compensation.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 8106(b) and 20 C.F.R. § 10.528, work-activity reporting and suspension.
  • Outcome: November 6, 2014 suspension decision affirmed.
  • Key point: A required EN1032 report not returned within 30 days triggers suspension until OWCP receives it.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
I.S., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 15-0800
) Issued: July 7, 2015
DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN
)
SERVICES, OFFICE OF CIVIL RIGHTS,
)
Dallas, TX, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:
CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Chief Judge
COLLEEN DUFFY KIKO, Judge
JAMES A. HAYNES, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On February 26, 2015 appellant filed a timely appeal from a November 6, 2014 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act1 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.2

ISSUE

The issue is whether OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation benefits effective November 16, 2014 for failure to complete an EN1032 form as requested.

1
5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
2
Appellant submitted two medical reports on appeal. The Board notes that it can only review evidence that was before OWCP at the time of the November 6, 2014 decision on appeal. 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1). FACTUAL HISTORY

On December 18, 1978 appellant, then a 55-year-old equal opportunity specialist, filed an occupational disease claim (Form CA-2) alleging that she had an emotional condition causally related to her federal employment. OWCP accepted the claim for depression on March 21, 1980. Appellant stopped working and began receiving wage-loss compensation on the periodic rolls.

OWCP periodically sent appellant a letter (Form CA-1032) requesting that she complete an enclosed form (Form EN1032) with regard to her employment activity, if any, within the past 15 months.3 By CA-1032 dated October 2, 2012, OWCP requested that she answer all questions on the EN1032 form within 30 days. Appellant was advised that failure to respond would result in suspension of benefits pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 10.528. She submitted a completed EN1032 on November 2, 2012.

OWCP sent appellant a CA-1032 dated October 2, 2013, again requesting that she complete an EN1032 form within 30 days. By decision dated November 18, 2013, it suspended appellant’s compensation effective December 15, 2013 for failure to submit the requested information. The record indicates that appellant submitted a completed EN1032 form on December 9, 2013 and the suspension was lifted. Appellant continued to receive wage-loss compensation.

On October 2, 2014 OWCP again requested that appellant complete an enclosed EN1032 form within 30 days. It again advised her that if she did not complete the form her compensation would be suspended pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 10.528.

By decision dated November 6, 2014, OWCP suspended appellant’s compensation effective November 16, 2014. It found that she had not submitted the requested information regarding her employment activity, if any. In addition, OWCP advised appellant that her compensation would be restored retroactively if she completed and submitted the EN1032 form.

LEGAL PRECEDENT

Section 8106(b) of FECA authorizes the Secretary of Labor to require a partially disabled employee to report his or her earnings from employment or self-employment, by affidavit or otherwise, in the manner and at the times the Secretary specifies.4

Under section 10.528 of OWCP’s implementing federal regulations, an employee in receipt of compensation benefits must complete an affidavit as to any work or activity indicating an ability to work which the employee has performed for the prior 15 months.5 If an employee who is required to file such a report fails to do so within 30 days of the date of the request, his or her right to compensation for wage loss is suspended until OWCP receives the requested report.

3
The EN1032 also requests information with respect to dependents, receipt of other federal benefits, third-party settlements, and fraud offenses.
4
5 U.S.C. § 8106(b).
5
20 C.F.R. § 10.528. See also A.H., Docket No. 15-241 (issued April 3, 2015).

2
At that time, OWCP will reinstate compensation retroactive to the date of suspension if the employee remains entitled to compensation.6

ANALYSIS

In the present case, OWCP sent appellant a letter dated October 2, 2014 requesting that she complete and return the enclosed EN1032 form. Appellant was advised that she must complete and return the form within 30 days, or her compensation would be suspended. This was consistent with previous requests sent periodically by OWCP.

The record indicates that appellant failed to timely submit the EN1032 form within 30 days. Appellant was receiving wage-loss compensation and she was required to complete the EN1032 form. The failure to file the EN1032 form within 30 days results in the suspension of compensation until OWCP receives the completed form. The Board finds that OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 10.528.

On appeal, appellant states that she did not complete the forms in a timely manner because she has health issues and was hospitalized for a short period on two occasions. Appellant’s compensation will be reinstated retroactive to the date of suspension once she properly submits the requested information.7 Based on the evidence of record, OWCP properly suspended compensation effective November 16, 2014 in this case.

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation effective November 16, 2014.

6
Id.; see also 20 C.F.R. § 525.
7
Supra note 4; see also T.G., Docket No. 14-952 (issued July 14, 2014).

3
ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs dated November 6, 2014 is affirmed.

Issued: July 7, 2015
Washington, DC

Christopher J. Godfrey, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Colleen Duffy Kiko, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James A. Haynes, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace