M.W. and Department of the Navy, Supply Department, Cherry Point, NC (Board decision, June 18, 2015)

M.W. (ECAB 15-0507): Compensation suspension for missing form upheld

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
15-0507
Decided
June 18, 2015
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-27

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2015, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2015
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board affirmed OWCP’s December 17, 2014 decision suspending wage loss compensation effective January 11, 2015. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

M.W., a former Navy supply clerk receiving benefits for an accepted back condition, was asked to complete an earnings and work activity affidavit on Form CA-1032. OWCP sent the request to her address of record and warned that benefits would be suspended if she did not respond within 30 days. The Board found no response before OWCP’s decision and upheld the suspension of wage loss compensation. It noted that eligible benefits would be restored retroactively once OWCP received the completed form.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 8106(b) and 20 C.F.R. § 10.528, reporting work and earnings.
  • Outcome: December 17, 2014 suspension decision affirmed, effective January 11, 2015.
  • Key point: Failure to return the requested Form CA-1032 allowed suspension until the form was submitted.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
M.W., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 15-507
) Issued: June 18, 2015
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, SUPPLY
)
DEPARTMENT, Cherry Point, NC, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:
CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Chief Judge
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge JAMES A. HAYNES, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On January 7, 2015 appellant filed a timely appeal from a December 17, 2014 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act1 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.

ISSUE

The issue is whether OWCP met its burden of proof to properly suspend appellant’s compensation for failing to submit a Form CA-1032, as requested.

FACTUAL HISTORY

On April 18, 1972 appellant, then a 40-year-old supply clerk, filed a traumatic injury claim alleging that on November 12, 1969 she sustained a back injury as a result of pulling 25- to

1
5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
35-pound ledgers down from shelves. OWCP accepted the claim for aggravation of degenerative disc disease. It paid compensation benefits for total disability beginning in 1972.

On November 3, 2014 OWCP informed appellant that federal regulations required her to make an affidavit relative to any earnings or employment during the previous year and that a Form CA-1032 was enclosed for that purpose. It notified her that she must fully answer all questions on the Form CA-1032 and return it within 30 days or her benefits would be suspended. The letter was sent to appellant’s address of record. Appellant did not respond.

By decision dated December 17, 2014, OWCP suspended appellant’s compensation benefits, effective January 11, 2015, for failing to submit the Form CA-1032, as requested. It noted that, if she completed and returned an enclosed copy of the Form CA-1032, her compensation benefits would be restored retroactively to the date they were suspended.

LEGAL PRECEDENT

FECA authorizes the Secretary of Labor to require a partially disabled employee to report his or her earnings from employment or self-employment, by affidavit or otherwise, in the manner and at the times the Secretary specifies.2

Under section 10.528 of OWCP’s implementing federal regulations, an employee in receipt of compensation benefits must complete an affidavit as to any work or activity indicating an ability to work which the employee has performed for the prior 15 months.3 If an employee who is required to file such a report fails to do so within 30 days of the date of the request, his or her right to compensation for wage loss is suspended until OWCP receives the requested report. At that time, OWCP will reinstate compensation retroactive to the date of suspension if the employee remains entitled to compensation.4

ANALYSIS

On November 3, 2014, OWCP provided appellant with a Form CA-1032. It notified her that federal regulations required her to complete the form and answer all questions concerning her employment or earnings. OWCP properly notified her that if she did not completely answer all questions and return the statement within 30 days, her benefits would be suspended. The record reflects that OWCP’s letter was properly sent to appellant’s address of record.5

2
Id. at § 8106(b).
3
20 C.F.R. § 10.528.
4
Id.; see also id. at § 10.525.
5
See J.J., Docket No. 13-1067 (issued September 20, 2013).

2
The record shows no response until the December 17, 2014 OWCP decision. Based on the evidence of record, the Board finds that OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation benefits effective January 11, 2015 pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 10.528.6

As noted, appellant’s benefits will be retroactively reinstated when she completes and submits the Form CA-1032 to OWCP, as mandated by law.

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP met its burden of proof to properly suspend appellant’s compensation benefits for failing to submit information on a Form CA-1032, as required.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the December 17, 2014 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is affirmed.

Issued: June 18, 2015
Washington, DC

Christopher J. Godfrey, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

James A. Haynes, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

6
J.J., Docket No. 09-1724 (issued March 1, 2010). See also James A. Igo, 49 ECAB 189 (1997).

3

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace