W.G. and Tennessee Valley Authority, Widows Creek Fossil Plant, Stevenson, AL (Board decision, July 13, 2015)

W.G. (ECAB 15-0416): Hearing loss files must be combined

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
15-0416
Decided
July 13, 2015
Outcome
Remanded
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-27

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2015, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2015
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB remand decision; the claim remains pending. The Board set aside OWCP’s October 31, 2014 denial and directed it to combine W.G.’s hearing loss files and issue a new decision. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).

Plain-English summary

W.G., a Tennessee Valley Authority worker, appealed OWCP’s denial of a hearing loss claim. He had received an earlier hearing loss schedule award under another claim number, but that complete file was missing from the record. The Board found that it needed both files to review the new denial fairly. It set aside the denial and ordered OWCP to combine the files, complete any needed development, and issue a new merits decision.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Ch. 2.4000.8(c), combining related claim files.
  • Outcome: October 31, 2014 hearing loss denial set aside; claim remanded for file combination and a new decision.
  • Key point: The earlier hearing loss file contained evidence needed to adjudicate the later claim.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
W.G., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 15-0416
) Issued: July 13, 2015
TENNESSEE VALLEY AUTHORITY,
)
WIDOWS CREEK FOSSIL PLANT,
)
Stevenson, AL, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

ORDER REMANDING CASE

Before:
CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Chief Judge
PATRICIA H. FITZGERALD, Deputy Chief Judge COLLEEN DUFFY KIKO, Judge

On December 15, 2014 appellant filed an application for review of an October 31, 2014 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP), claim number xxxxxx709, which denied his claim. The appeal was docketed as No. 15-416.

In the October 31, 2014 decision, OWCP denied appellant’s claim noting that he had not established that his hearing loss was causally related to his employment. The record reflects that appellant was granted a prior schedule award for four percent bilateral hearing loss in 2002 while performing his employment duties as a conveyor car dump operator, in claim number xxxxxx181. The record before the Board contains certain documents from claim number xxxxxx181, however, the complete record for claim number xxxxxx181 is not before the Board.

The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that the case is not in posture for a decision. There is medical and factual evidence that are germane to the issues pending on appeal before the Board in claim number xxxxx709. OWCP procedures provide for combining files in claims pertaining to the same area of the body and where correct adjudication depends on cross- referencing between files.1 In the instant appeal, for a full and fair adjudication, the OWCP 1 Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- File Maintenance and Management, Doubling Case Files, Chapter 2.4000.8(c) (February 2000). claims pertaining to appellant’s hearing loss should be combined. This will allow the Board to consider all relevant evidence in deciding appellant’s claim.

The case will be remanded to OWCP to combine case files for claim numbers xxxxxx709 and xxxxxx181. Following this and such other development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue an appropriate merit decision on appellant’s claim.

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the October 31, 2014 decision be set aside and the matter remanded to OWCP for further proceedings consistent with this order.

Issued: July 13, 2015
Washington, DC

Christopher J. Godfrey, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia H. Fitzgerald, Deputy Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Colleen Duffy Kiko, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

2

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace