L.N. and Department of the Navy, Norfolk Naval Shipyard, Portsmouth, VA (Board decision, November 13, 2014)

L.N. (ECAB 14-1168): Hearing loss award increased for tinnitus

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
14-1168
Decided
November 13, 2014
Outcome
Modified
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-27

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2014, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2014
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board affirmed OWCP’s April 1, 2014 schedule award as modified, increasing the compensable binaural hearing loss to 26 percent. Under 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d), this Board decision becomes final 30 days after issuance unless the Board fixed a different period in it. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days unless the decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).

Plain-English summary

L.N., a former Navy shipyard welder, had an accepted claim for work-related hearing loss. OWCP awarded compensation based on 21.24 percent binaural hearing loss, excluding an additional rating for tinnitus that its examining specialist had recommended. The Board found that the specialist described tinnitus interfering with sleep and other daily activities, while OWCP’s medical adviser gave no reason to exclude it. Applying the impairment guide and rounding rule, the Board modified the award to 26 percent binaural hearing loss.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 8107 and 20 C.F.R. § 10.404, schedule awards and impairment ratings.
  • Outcome: April 1, 2014 award affirmed as modified to 26 percent binaural hearing loss.
  • Key point: The documented effect of tinnitus supported an additional impairment rating that OWCP’s medical adviser had not addressed.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
L.N., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 14-1168
) Issued: November 13, 2014
DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY, NORFOLK
)
NAVAL SHIPYARD, Portsmouth, VA, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
David G. Jennings, Esq., for the appellant
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:
CHRISTOPHER J. GODFREY, Chief Judge
PATRICIA HOWARD FITZGERALD, Judge
MICHAEL E. GROOM, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On April 23, 2014 appellant, through counsel, timely appealed the April 1, 2014 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) which granted a schedule award. Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act1 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R.
§§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.

ISSUE

The issue is whether appellant has greater than 21.24 percent binaural hearing loss.

FACTUAL HISTORY

Appellant, a 68-year-old former welder, has an accepted occupational disease claim for bilateral sensorineural hearing loss, which arose on or about March 15, 1987.2 OWCP accepted

1
5 U.S.C. §§ 8101-8193 (2006).
2
Appellant retired effective December 31, 1999. the claim based on the May 29, 2013 opinion of Dr. Eugenia M.G. Gray, a Board-certified otolaryngologist and OWCP-referral physician.

Dr. Gray diagnosed employment-related bilateral sensorineural hearing loss. She also rated a 26.25 percent binaural hearing loss, which included an additional 5 percent bilateral impairment due to tinnitus.3 Dr. Gray noted a history of tinnitus began in the 1970’s. Tinnitus reportedly made appellant’s headaches worse, but once he began using earplugs, it helped with the bothersome noise and the tinnitus as well. However, earplugs did not resolve the headaches or tinnitus completely. Dr. Gray further noted that currently appellant’s tinnitus was most bothersome for him. It was nagging and irritating and kept him from sleeping. The right side was a little worse than the left. Appellant reported that he occasionally felt off balance because of the tinnitus, and sometimes associated a little mild nausea with the severity of the tinnitus. He would go to sleep, but when he awoke the sound never went away.

OWCP referred Dr. Gray’s findings to a district medical adviser, Dr. Duane J. Taylor, a Board-certified otolaryngologist, who found 21.24 percent binaural hearing loss. Dr. Taylor also found that appellant reached maximum medical improvement as of May 29, 2013. His impairment rating mirrored Dr. Gray’s, with one exception -- he did not include impairment for tinnitus.

On April 1, 2014 OWCP granted a schedule award for 21.24 percent binaural hearing loss. The award covered a period of 42 weeks beginning May 29, 2013. OWCP explained that the award was based on Dr. Taylor’s findings, which differed from Dr. Gray’s impairment rating.

On appeal, counsel noted that Dr. Taylor provided no explanation for excluding Dr. Gray’s five percent rating for tinnitus.

LEGAL PRECEDENT

Section 8107 of FECA sets forth the number of weeks of compensation to be paid for the permanent loss of use of specified members, functions and organs of the body.4 FECA, however, does not specify the manner by which the percentage loss of a member, function or organ shall be determined. To ensure consistent results and equal justice under the law, good administrative practice requires the use of uniform standards applicable to all claimants. The implementing regulations have adopted the American Medical Association, Guides to the Evaluation of Permanent Impairment as the appropriate standard for evaluating schedule losses.5

3
The May 29, 2013 audiogram which Dr. Gray relied upon noted losses at the frequencies of 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 cycles per second (cps). The right ear losses were recorded as 30, 40, 40 and 55 decibels (dB). The left ear losses were recorded as 20, 30, 50 and 55 dB. 4 For complete loss of hearing of one ear, an employee shall receive 52 weeks’ compensation. 5 U.S.C.
§ 8107(c)(13). For complete loss of hearing of both ears, an employee shall receive 200 weeks’ compensation. Id. 5 20 C.F.R. § 10.404 (2014).

2
Effective May 1, 2009, schedule awards are determined in accordance with the sixth edition of the A.M.A., Guides (2008).6

Using the frequencies of 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 3,000 cps, the losses at each frequency are added up and averaged.7 Then, the “fence” of 25 dB is deducted because, as the A.M.A., Guides points out, losses below 25 dB result in no impairment in the ability to hear everyday speech under everyday conditions.8 The remaining amount is multiplied by a factor of 1.5 to arrive at the percentage of monaural hearing loss.9 The binaural loss is determined by calculating the loss in each ear using the formula for monaural loss; the lesser loss is multiplied by five, and then added to the greater loss and the total is divided by six to arrive at the amount of the binaural hearing loss.10

ANALYSIS

Based on the May 29, 2013 audiogram, appellant’s right ear hearing losses at 500, 1,000, 2,000, and 3,000 cps were 30, 40, 40 and 55 dB, which totaled 165 dB. His left ear losses were 20, 30, 50 and 55 dB, which totaled 155 dB. The right ear hearing loss of 165 dB resulted in an average loss of 41.25, and the left ear loss averaged 38.75 dB. After subtracting the 25 dB fence, the right ear loss was 16.25 and the left ear loss was 13.75 dB. Each loss was multiplied by 1.5, resulting in a right ear loss of 24.375 dB and a left ear loss of 20.625 dB. The lesser of the two (20.625 dB) was multiplied by 5 and added to the greater loss (24.375 dB), then divided by 6 (127.5÷6) to calculate the binaural loss of 21.25 dB. Dr. Gray rated an additional 5 percent binaural hearing loss due to tinnitus, for an overall rating of 26.25 percent. Dr. Taylor did not address the additional five percent for tinnitus.

The A.M.A., Guides allow for up to an additional five percent impairment for tinnitus.
Specifically, the A.M.A., Guides provide that if the tinnitus interferes with activities of daily living, including sleep, reading (and other tasks requiring concentration), enjoyment of quiet recreation and emotional well-being, up to five percent may be added to a measurable binaural hearing impairment.11

Dr. Gray noted a history of tinnitus dating back to the 1970’s. Tinnitus reportedly made appellant’s headaches worse. While earplugs helped, this protective measure did not resolve appellant’s headaches or tinnitus completely. Dr. Gray also noted that currently appellant’s tinnitus was most bothersome for him. The tinnitus was nagging and irritating and kept him

6
See Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 3 -- Medical, Schedule Awards, Chapter 3.700, Exhibit 1 (January 2010); and Part 2 -- Claims, Schedule Awards & Permanent Disability Claims, Chapter 2.808.6a (February 2013). 7 See Section 11.2, Hearing and Tinnitus, A.M.A., Guides 248-51 (6th ed. 2008).
8
Id. at 250.
9
Id. at 250-51.
10
Id. at 251.
11
Section 11.2b, Tinnitus, A.M.A., Guides 249 (6th ed. 2008).

3 from sleeping. The right side was noted to be a little worse than the left. Appellant also reported occasionally feeling off balance because of the tinnitus. Dr. Gray further noted that appellant sometimes associated a little mild nausea with the severity of the tinnitus.

The Board finds that Dr. Gray’s May 29, 2013 report provided sufficient explanation to support an additional five percent binaural hearing loss due to tinnitus. As noted, Dr. Taylor offered no explanation for excluding the additional rating for tinnitus. Consistent with OWCP procedures, Dr. Gray’s overall rating of 26.25 percent is rounded down to 26 percent binaural hearing loss.12 Accordingly, the April 1, 2014 decision shall be modified to reflect appellant’s entitlement to a schedule award for 26 percent binaural hearing loss.

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that appellant has proven he sustained hearing loss greater than 21.24 percent. The record establishes that appellant has 26 percent binaural hearing loss and such disability benefits are therefore awarded on this appeal.

ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the April 1, 2014 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is affirmed, as modified.

Issued: November 13, 2014
Washington, DC

Christopher J. Godfrey, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Patricia Howard Fitzgerald, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Michael E. Groom, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

12
Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 3 -- Medical, Schedule Awards, Chapter 3.700.4b(2)(b).

4

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace