E.E. and U.S. Postal Service, Post Office, Nashville, TN (Board decision, August 20, 2014)

E.E. (ECAB 14-0230): Benefit suspension for missing earnings form affirmed

Decision type
Board decision
Docket
14-0230
Decided
August 20, 2014
Outcome
Affirmed
Precedential status
Citable Board precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-28

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Board precedent from 2014, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 2014
The statutes and regulations the Board applies may have been amended, and later Board or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official ECAB release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (dol.gov)

ECAB final decision. The Board affirmed OWCP’s October 17, 2013 decision suspending E.E.’s compensation for failure to return a requested earnings form. Under 20 C.F.R. § 501.6(d), this Board decision becomes final 30 days after issuance unless the Board fixed a different period in it. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days unless this decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).

Plain-English summary

E.E., a postal employee receiving compensation, was asked to complete a Form EN1032 about her employment and earnings. OWCP sent the form and warned that benefits would be suspended if she did not return complete answers within 30 days. The Board found that the notice was sent to her last known address and that she had not responded before OWCP’s decision. It affirmed the suspension under the governing regulation.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: FECA earnings information, 5 U.S.C. § 8106(b), and 20 C.F.R. § 10.528.
  • Outcome: October 17, 2013 compensation suspension decision affirmed.
  • Key point: Failure to return the requested earnings form after notice supported suspension.

Full text (ECAB public release)

United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

________
)
E.E., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 14-230
) Issued: August 20, 2014
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,
)
Nashville, TN, Employer
)
__________ )

Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director

DECISION AND ORDER

Before:
PATRICIA HOWARD FITZGERALD, Acting Chief Judge COLLEEN DUFFY KIKO, Judge
MICHAEL E. GROOM, Alternate Judge

JURISDICTION

On November 13, 2013 appellant filed a timely appeal from the October 17, 2013 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP). Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act1 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits of this case.2

ISSUE

The issue is whether OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation for failure to submit a Form EN1032, as requested.

1
5 U.S.C. § 8101 et seq.
2
The Board notes that appellant submitted additional evidence after the October 17, 2013 decision. The Board may only review evidence that was in the record at the time OWCP issued its final decision. See 20 C.F.R.
§ 501.2(c)(1); M.B., Docket No. 09-176 (issued September 23, 2009); J.T., 59 ECAB 293, 295 n.1 (2008); G.G., 58 ECAB 389, 391 n.7 (2007); Donald R. Gervasi, 57 ECAB 281, 284 n.1 (2005); Rosemary A. Kayes, 54 ECAB 373, 375 n.8 (2003). Therefore, this additional evidence cannot be considered on appeal. See James C. Campbell, 5 ECAB 35, 36 n.2 (1952). FACTUAL HISTORY

On December 4, 1995 appellant, then a 44-year-old city letter carrier, filed an occupational disease claim (Form CA-2) alleging that she sustained right carpal tunnel syndrome as a result of her federal employment. OWCP accepted her claim for right carpal tunnel syndrome on February 15, 1996, and subsequently accepted the claim on December 8, 2010 for bilateral carpal tunnel syndrome; a right foreign body left during a surgical procedure, and a residual foreign body in her soft tissue. It paid wage-loss benefits for disability beginning October 25, 2002, and placed her on the periodic rolls beginning September 4, 2005.

On September 3, 2013 OWCP informed appellant that federal regulations required her to make an affidavit of any earnings or employment during the previous year and that a Form EN1032 was enclosed for that purpose.3 It notified her that she had to fully answer all questions on the Form EN1032 and return the statement within 30 days or her benefits would be suspended. The letter was sent to appellant’s last known address. Appellant did not respond.

By decision dated October 17, 2013, OWCP suspended appellant’s compensation benefits, effective December 15, 2013, for failing to submit the form as requested. It noted that, if she completed and returned an enclosed copy of the form, her compensation benefits would be restored retroactively to the date they were suspended.

LEGAL PRECEDENT

FECA authorizes the Secretary of Labor to require a partially disabled employee to report his or her earnings from employment or self-employment, by affidavit or otherwise, in the manner and at the times the Secretary specifies.4

Under section 10.528 of OWCP’s implementing federal regulations, an employee in receipt of compensation benefits must complete an affidavit as to any work or activity indicating an ability to work which the employee has performed for the prior 15 months.5 If an employee who is required to file such a report fails to do so within 30 days of the date of the request, his or her right to compensation for wage loss is suspended until OWCP receives the requested report.6 At that time, OWCP will reinstate compensation retroactive to the date of suspension if the employee remains entitled to compensation.7

3
The Board notes that following her placement in the periodic rolls, appellant had completed and submitted prior EN1032 forms to OWCP. 4 5 U.S.C. § 8106(b).
5
20 C.F.R. § 10.528.
6
See N.G., Docket No. 12-981 (issued December 4, 2012); Lucille A. Pettaway, 55 ECAB 228, 232 (2004); Demetrius Beverly, 53 ECAB 305, 307 (2002). 7 Supra note 4.

2
ANALYSIS

On September 3, 2013 OWCP provided appellant with a Form EN1032 and explained that federal regulations required her to complete it and answer all questions concerning her employment and earnings. It properly notified her that if she did not completely answer all questions and return the statement within 30 days, her benefits would be suspended. The notification was properly sent to appellant’s last known address.8 Appellant did not respond prior to the October 17, 2013 decision.

Based on the evidence of record, the Board finds that OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation benefits effective December 15, 2013 pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 10.528.9

Appellant may submit new evidence or argument with a written request for reconsideration to OWCP within one year of this merit decision, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8128(a) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 10.605 through 10.607.

CONCLUSION

The Board finds that OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation benefits for failing to submit information on a Form EN1032, as requested.

8
J.J., Docket No. 13-1067 (issued September 20, 2013).
9
See J.J., Docket No. 09-1724 (issued March 1, 2010). See also James A. Igo, 49 ECAB 189, 191 (1997).

3
ORDER

IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the October 17, 2013 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is affirmed.

Issued: August 20, 2014
Washington, DC

Patricia Howard Fitzgerald, Acting Chief Judge Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Colleen Duffy Kiko, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

Michael E. Groom, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board

4

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace