Longhorn Service Company
Remand to vacate Item 2A and set Item 2B penalty
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Commission precedent from 2016, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Plain-English summary
The Tenth Circuit directed the Commission to vacate Citation 1, Item 2A and enter a separate penalty for Citation 1, Item 2B. The Commission sent the case back to the administrative law judge for proceedings consistent with the court's opinion.
Decision snapshot
- Cited standard(s): None specified in the decision.
- Outcome: The case was remanded to the judge to vacate Item 2A and set a separate penalty for Item 2B.
- Key point: The judge must revise the citation and penalty disposition to carry out the Tenth Circuit's mandate.
Full text (OSHRC public release)
Longhorn Service Company Docket No. 13-1458
United States of America
OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH REVIEW COMMISSION
1120 20 th
Street, N.W., Ninth Floor
Washington, DC 20036-3457
SECRETARY OF LABOR,
Complainant,
v.
OSHRC Docket No.
13-1458
LONGHORN SERVICE COMPANY ,
Respondent.
REMAND ORDER
Before: ATTWOOD , Chairman;
and
M ac DOUGALL ,
Commissioner.
BY THE COMMISSION:
This case is before the Commission on remand from the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit. Longhorn Service Co.
v. Perez ,
No. 15-9554 , 2016
WL
3397714
(10 th
Cir.
June 14,
201 6 ) . On appeal
by Respondent , the court reviewed a decision of Administrative Law Judge
John H. Schumacher .
Longhorn Service Co. ,
25
BNA
OSHC
1572
(No. 13-1458, 2015) .
By mandate
issued
August 8, 2016 , the court has remanded the case to the Commission
to vacate Citation
1 , Item 2A and to enter a separate penalty for Citation
1 , Item 2B.
We, in turn,
remand this case to the judge for further proceedings consistent with the court’s opinion.
SO
ORDERED.
/s/
Cynthia L. Attwood
Chairman
/s/
Heather L. MacDougall
Dated: September 20, 2016
Commissioner
"
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read Commission precedent from 2016. Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the authority it relies on.