G.K. and U.S. Postal Service, Post Office, Dumont, NJ (Board decision, May 22, 2013)
G.K. (ECAB 13-382): Missing hearing transcript requires remand
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2013, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside OWCP’s August 8, 2012 reconsideration denial and remanded because the record sent to the Board lacked a hearing transcript cited by an earlier OWCP decision. OWCP must reconstruct the record and issue a new decision; the claim remains unresolved. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless the order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a). FECA compensation decisions are generally not subject to court review under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b).
Plain-English summary
G.K., a Postal Service employee, appealed OWCP’s refusal to reconsider his claim. The case record sent to the Board contained documents referring to a September 2011 teleconference hearing, but lacked its transcript. The Board found that the missing testimony prevented informed review of OWCP’s decision. It set aside the reconsideration denial and ordered OWCP to assemble a complete record, consider the evidence and issue a new decision.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Requirement for a complete administrative record on Board review.
- Outcome: August 8, 2012 decision set aside; case returned for record reconstruction and a new decision.
- Key point: The Board needed the missing transcript from an earlier hearing to review the complete record on reconsideration.
Full text (ECAB public release)
United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
_______
)
G.K., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 13-382
)
Issued: May 22, 2013
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE, )
Dumont, NJ Employer
)
_______ )
Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
James Muirhead, Esq., for the appellant
Office of Solicitor, for the Director
ORDER REMANDING CASE
Before:
RICHARD J. DASCHBACH, Chief Judge
PATRICIA HOWARD FITZGERALD, Judge
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Alternate Judge
On December 6, 2012 appellant, through his attorney, filed an application for review of an August 8, 2012 nonmerit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) which denied his request for reconsideration from an April 27, 2012 OWCP decision.1
On December 31, 2012 the Clerk of the Board served the Director of OWCP with a copy of the application for review and requested the Director to transmit the case records in OWCP File No. xxxxxx123. On January 9, 2013 the Director forwarded the case record to the Board, which consisted of 39 imaged documents in File No. xxxxxx123.
The Board, having reviewed the case record submitted by OWCP, notes that the record is incomplete. A review of the case record reveals that a hearing was held by teleconference on September 26, 2011; however, the transcript from that hearing is missing from the record before the Board. The Board notes that an OWCP hearing representative subsequently issued a December 2, 2011 decision that referred to testimony from the hearing. As the record before the Board is incomplete and would not permit an informed adjudication of the case by the Board, the Board concludes that the case is not in posture for a decision and must be remanded to OWCP
1
The April 27, 2012 decision denied modification of a December 2, 2011 hearing representative’s decision. for reconstruction and proper assemblage of the case record, to be followed by an appropriate decision on appellant’s request for reconsideration.
For this reason, the case will be remanded to OWCP to enable it to properly consider all the evidence submitted at the time of the August 8, 2012 decision. Following such further development as OWCP deems necessary, it shall issue an appropriate decision on the claim.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the August 8, 2012 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is set aside. The case recorded is remanded to OWCP for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board.
Issued: May 22, 2013
Washington, DC
Richard J. Daschbach, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Patricia Howard Fitzgerald, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Alec J. Koromilas, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
2
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace