A.S. and U.S. Postal Service, Post Office, Carthage, NC (Board decision, February 15, 2013)
A.S. (ECAB 12-1803): Compensation suspension for missing earnings report upheld
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2013, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
ECAB final decision on the merits. The Board affirmed OWCP's August 16, 2012 decision suspending compensation for failure to return an earnings report. The Board's decision on the claim is final under 5 U.S.C. § 8128(b), without ordinary judicial review. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless this decision specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).
Plain-English summary
A.S., a rural mail carrier, received compensation after a work-related vehicle collision caused an accepted neck sprain. OWCP asked her to complete an EN1032 form reporting employment activity and warned that benefits could be suspended if she did not respond within 30 days. She did not return the form before OWCP acted. The Board affirmed the suspension effective August 26, 2012. A form she submitted with her appeal was outside the record the Board could review, though she could send it to OWCP.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Earnings reporting and suspension under 5 U.S.C. § 8106(c) and 20 C.F.R. § 10.528.
- Outcome: August 16, 2012 suspension decision affirmed.
- Key point: The requested earnings report was not submitted before OWCP suspended compensation.
Full text (ECAB public release)
United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
________
)
A.S., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 12-1803
) Issued: February 15, 2013
U.S. POSTAL SERVICE, POST OFFICE,
)
Carthage, NC, Employer
)
__________ )
Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of the Solicitor, for the Director
DECISION AND ORDER
Before:
ALEC J. KOROMILAS, Alternate Judge
MICHAEL E. GROOM, Alternate Judge
JAMES A. HAYNES, Alternate Judge
JURISDICTION
On August 29, 2012 appellant filed a timely appeal from an August 16, 2012 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) suspending her compensation. Pursuant to the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act1 (FECA) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 501.2(c) and 501.3, the Board has jurisdiction over the merits of the case.
ISSUE
The issue is whether OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation benefits for failure to submit an EN1032 form when requested.
FACTUAL HISTORY
On March 1, 2012 appellant, then a 35-year-old rural carrier, filed a traumatic injury claim after her vehicle was struck from behind while delivering mail. She stopped work the
1
5 U.S.C. §§ 8101-8193. same day and did not return. OWCP accepted the claim for a neck sprain and appellant received wage-loss compensation and medical benefits.
By letter dated July 2, 2012, OWCP asked appellant to complete a Form EN1032 within 30 days to provide information regarding any earnings over the reporting period. It was sent to her address of record. Appellant was advised that her benefits would be suspended pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 10.528 if a completed EN/CA-1032 form was not received by OWCP within 30 days. No response was received.
By decision dated August 16, 2012, OWCP suspended appellant’s wage-loss benefits effective August 26, 2012 finding that she did not submit a complete Form EN/CA-1032, as requested. It informed her that, when she completed the EN/CA-1032 form, her compensation would be restored retroactively from the date of suspension.2
LEGAL PRECEDENT
FECA authorizes the Secretary of Labor to require a partially disabled employee to report his or her earnings from employment or self-employment, by affidavit or otherwise, in the manner and at the times the Secretary specifies.3
Under section 10.528 of OWCP’s implementing federal regulations, an employee in receipt of compensation benefits must complete an affidavit as to any work or activity indicating an ability to work which the employee has performed for the prior 15 months.4 If an employee who is required to file such a report fails to do so within 30 days of the date of the request, his or her right to compensation for wage loss is suspended until OWCP receives the requested report.5 At that time, OWCP will reinstate compensation retroactive to the date of suspension if the employee remains entitled to compensation.6
ANALYSIS
OWCP requested that appellant submit an EN1032 form with respect to any employment activity performed during the prior 15 months. It requested the information by letter dated July 2, 2012. OWCP advised her to submit the form within 30 days or her compensation could be suspended. The record establishes that appellant did not respond prior to OWCP’s August 16,
2
The Board notes that appellant submitted a completed Form EN1032 with her appeal. The Board may only review evidence that was in the record at the time OWCP issued its final decision. See 20 C.F.R. § 501.2(c)(1); M.B., Docket No. 09-176 (issued September 23, 2009); J.T., 59 ECAB 293 (2008); G.G., 58 ECAB 389 (2007); Donald R. Gervasi, 57 ECAB 281 (2005); Rosemary A. Kayes, 54 ECAB 373 (2003). This decision does not preclude appellant from submitting this evidence to OWCP. 3 5 U.S.C. § 8106(c).
4
20 C.F.R. § 10.528.
5
See Lucille A. Pettaway, 55 ECAB 228 (2004); Demetrius Beverly, 53 ECAB 305 (2002).
6
Supra note 3.
2
2012 decision. As noted, a recipient of compensation is required to submit a report as to earnings or self-employment as required by OWCP.7
Based on the evidence of record, OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation effective August 26, 2012 pursuant to 20 C.F.R. § 10.528.
Appellant may submit new evidence or argument with a written request for reconsideration to OWCP within one year of this merit decision, pursuant to 5 U.S.C. § 8128(a) and 20 C.F.R. §§ 10.605 through 10.607.
CONCLUSION
The Board finds that OWCP properly suspended appellant’s compensation benefits based on her failure to timely submit a completed EN1032 form when requested.
ORDER
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the August 16, 2012 decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs is affirmed.
Issued: February 15, 2013
Washington, DC
Alec J. Koromilas, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Michael E. Groom, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
James A. Haynes, Alternate Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
7
See Robert A. Robbins, Docket No. 05-728 (issued July 15, 2005).
3
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace