D.G. and Defense Logistics Agency, Naval Supply Center, Norfolk, VA (Board decision, September 12, 2012)
D.G. (ECAB 12-0576): Hearing loss claim returned for complete files
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Board precedent from 2012, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
ECAB remand decision. The Board set aside OWCP's December 22, 2011 denial of D.G.'s hearing loss claim and directed it to combine the related claim files. Whether his hearing loss arose in the performance of duty remains unresolved. A party may petition the Board for reconsideration within 30 days of issuance unless the order specifies another period, under 20 C.F.R. § 501.7(a).
Plain-English summary
D.G., a Defense Logistics Agency worker, sought compensation for hearing loss. OWCP denied the claim while relying in part on findings in his earlier compensation files. The Board could not access one of those files in the record sent for review. It set aside the denial and directed OWCP to combine all of his hearing loss files before issuing a new merits decision.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: OWCP procedure for combining claim files needed for cross reference.
- Outcome: December 22, 2011 denial set aside and remanded for a complete record.
- Key point: The Board could not review a denial that relied on an absent related claim file.
Full text (ECAB public release)
United States Department of Labor
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
________
)
D.G., Appellant
)
)
and ) Docket No. 12-576
) Issued: September 12, 2012
DEFENSE LOGISTIC AGENCY, NAVAL
)
SUPPLY CENTER, Norfolk, VA, Employer
)
__________ )
Appearances: Case Submitted on the Record
Appellant, pro se
Office of Solicitor, for the Director
ORDER REMANDING CASE
Before:
RICHARD J. DASCHBACH, Chief Judge
COLLEEN DUFFY KIKO, Judge
PATRICIA HOWARD FITZGERALD, Judge
On January 23, 2012 appellant filed an application requesting review of a December 22, 2011 merit decision of the Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs (OWCP) adjudicating his hearing loss claim in OWCP file number xxxxxx409. By that decision OWCP denied appellant’s claim for hearing loss finding that it did not arise in the performance of duty. The appeal was docketed as No. 12-576.
The Board has duly considered the matter and notes that OWCP, in its December 22, 2011 decision, based its decision, in part, on evidence and findings made in prior compensation claims of appellant under file numbers xxxxxx702 and xxxxx039. As assembled, the case record now before the Board does not allow access to case number xxxxxx039, and as such, the case record forwarded to the Board is incomplete. Under its procedures, OWCP has determined that cases should be combined where correct adjudication depends on cross-referencing between files. In the instant appeal, it appears that, for a full and fair adjudication, all OWCP claims pertaining to appellant’s hearing loss should be combined pursuant to OWCP procedures.1
1
See Federal (FECA) Procedure Manual, Part 2 -- Claims, File Maintenance and Management, Chapter 2.400.8(c) (February 2000).
The case will be remanded to OWCP to combine case File Nos. xxxxxx409, xxxxxx702 and xxxxxx039. Following this and such other development as deemed necessary, OWCP shall issue an appropriate merit decision on appellant’s claim.
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED THAT the December 22, 2011 Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs’ decision be set aside and the case remanded to OWCP for further proceedings consistent with this order of the Board.
Issued: September 12, 2012
Washington, DC
Richard J. Daschbach, Chief Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Colleen Duffy Kiko, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
Patricia Howard Fitzgerald, Judge
Employees’ Compensation Appeals Board
2
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Try Ezel Pro free for 7 days. Cancel anytime before the trial ends and you pay nothing.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace