Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization, Local 216 and Federal Aviation Administration, Greater Buffalo International Airport Traffic Control Tower (Authority decision, January 14, 1983)
PATCO Buffalo complaint dismissed as moot (FLRA 1-CO-23)
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 1983, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Final FLRA decision. The Authority dismissed a complaint as moot. An aggrieved person may seek judicial review by filing a petition in an appropriate United States court of appeals within 60 days after issuance under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a).
Plain-English summary
A complaint against PATCO Local 216 at the Buffalo airport traffic control tower came to the Authority on transfer from a regional director. The General Counsel requested dismissal after the Authority separately revoked PATCO’s recognition for prohibited strike activity. The Authority found that PATCO was no longer a statutory labor organization and that a ruling on the complaint would have no practical legal effect. It dismissed the complaint as moot without deciding its merits.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Complaint dismissal under 5 U.S.C. § 7105(a)(2)(G).
- Outcome: Complaint dismissed as moot.
- Key point: The Authority ended the case after PATCO lost labor-organization status.
Full text (FLRA public release)
[ v11 p32 ]
11:0032(16)CO
The decision of the Authority follows:
11 FLRA No. 16
PROFESSIONAL AIR TRAFFIC CONTROLLERS
ORGANIZATION, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 216
Respondent
and
FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION,
AIRPORT TRAFFIC CONTROL TOWER,
GREATER BUFFALO INTERNATIONAL
AIRPORT, CHEEKTOWAGA, NEW YORK
Charging Party
Case No. 1-CO-23
ORDER GRANTING MOTION TO DISMISS COMPLAINT
The above-entitled case is before the Federal Labor Relations Authority pursuant to section 7105(a)(2)(G) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute), after being transferred by the Regional Director's "Order Transferring Case to the Federal Labor Relations Authority" in accordance with section 2429.1(a) of the Authority's Rules and Regulations. Thereafter, the General Counsel filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in view of the Authority's decision in Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization, Affiliated with MEBA, AFL-CIO, 7 FLRA No. 10 (1981), affirmed sub nom., Professional Air Traffic Controllers Organization v. Federal Labor Relations Authority, 685 F.2d 547 (D.C. Cir. 1982).
In that decision, the Authority revoked the exclusive recognition status of the Respondent herein, PATCO, for having engaged in strike activity prohibited by section 7116(b)(7) of the Statute, and found that PATCO is no longer a labor organization within the meaning of the Statute.
Upon careful consideration of the motion to dismiss filed by the General Counsel, it has been determined that this unfair labor practice case has been rendered moot. Thus, due to Respondent's loss of status as an exclusive representative and as a labor organization under the Statute, any decision rendered herein cannot have any practical legal effect.
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the complaint in the above-entitled case be, and it hereby is, dismissed.
Issued, Washington, D.C., January 14, 1983
Ronald W. Haughton, Chairman
Henry B. Frazier III, Member
Leon B. Applewhaite, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace