Rakich Masonry

Plain-English summary

The judge dismissed Rakich Masonry's notice of contest after the company failed to answer the Secretary's complaint or respond to a show-cause order. The dismissal affirmed a serious citation and $3,000 in proposed penalties. The company's owner later said he had not abandoned the case and had difficulty receiving mail because he had been incarcerated on unrelated charges. The certified show-cause order had been returned unopened, but the record did not contain enough evidence to decide whether the company's failure had a sufficient reason. The Commission set aside the dismissal and remanded for further factual development.

Decision snapshot

• Cited standard(s): No specific standard identified in the decision.
• Outcome: The Commission set aside the default dismissal and remanded for further proceedings.
• Key point: A plausible explanation for missing a show-cause order required factual development before the employer's contest could be dismissed.

Full text (OSHRC public release)

Rakich Masonry, Docket No. 06-1159

SECRETARY OF LABOR,

Complainant,

v.

OSHRC Docket No. 06-1159

RAKICH MASONRY,

Respondent.

REMAND ORDER

In an order dated November 24, 2006, Chief Administrative Judge Irving Sommer
dismissed Rakich Masonry’s notice of contest for its failure either to file an answer to the
Secretary’s complaint or respond to the judge’s subsequent show cause order. In his
order dismissing the case, the judge also affirmed the serious citation and proposed
penalties totaling $3,000.

On November 30, 2006, however, the judge received a letter from the owner of
Rakich Masonry, Drago Rakich, appearing pro Se, which the Commission treated as a
petition for discretionary review. In his letter, Mr. Rakich explains that he does not
intend to cause delay and has not abandoned his case but describes his difficulty in
receiving mail due to his incarceration in the Rockwall (Texas) County Jail since August
2006 on unrelated charges. Mr. Rakich’s only proof of incarceration is a blank form
from the Rockwall County Jail entitled “Inmate Worker (Trusty) Request Form.” We
also note that the judge’s show cause order, sent via certified mail, was returned to the
Commission unopened with the unsigned return-receipt card on November 13, 2006.

Based on Mr. Rakich’s letter, the alleged circumstances may represent a
“sufficient” reason for Rakich Masonry’s failure to file an answer or respond to the show

cause order under Commission Rule of Procedure 101(b), 29 C.F.R. § 2200.101(b).
However, the Commission has not been presented with a sufficient factual record to make
such a decision.

Accordingly, we set aside the judge’s order of dismissal and remand for further
proceedings consistent with this order.

SO ORDERED.

/s/_____

W. Scott Railton

Chairman

/s/____

Thomasina V. Rogers

Commissioner  

/s/_____

Horace A. Thompson

Commissioner

Date: January 12, 2007

Secretary of Labor,

Complainant,

V.

OSHRC DOCKET NO. 06-1159

RAKICH MASONRY,

Respondent.

ORDER

On 10/10/06 the undersigned issued an ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE to the
Respondent as to why his Notice of Contest should not be dismissed for failure to file
an answer to the complaint as requfred by the Commission Rules of Procedure. The
Respondent failed to reply to the ORDER. His actions demonstrate either that he has
abandoned the case or treats the Rules of Procedure of the Commission with disdain.
This cannot be countenanced as it seriously impedes the administration of justice.

Accordingly, the Notice of Contest filed by the Respondent is dismissed. The
Secretary’s citation(s) and proposed penalties are AFFIRMED in all respects.

/s/

IRVING SOMMER

Chief Judge

DATE: November 24, 2006

Washington, D.C.