American Federation of Government Employees, Local 3760 and Social Security Administration, Disability Analysis Branch, Field Assessment Office (Authority decision, March 10, 1983)
American Federation of Government Employees, Local 3760 and Social Security Administration, Disability Analysis Branch, Field Assessment Office (FLRA 0-NG-566): SSA examiner telephone proposal nonnegotiable
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 1983, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Final FLRA decision. The Authority resolved the union's negotiability petition. An aggrieved person may seek judicial review of this final order in an appropriate United States court of appeals within 60 days after issuance under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a). A petition does not itself stay the order.
Plain-English summary
The union proposed giving each SSA disability examiner a personal telephone. The Authority found that the equipment requirement concerned the technology of performing work. Under the statute, bargaining on that subject depended on the agency's choice, and SSA had chosen not to bargain. The Authority dismissed the petition on the merits.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Technology of performing work under 5 U.S.C. § 7106(b)(1).
- Outcome: Agency's nonnegotiability position sustained; petition dismissed.
- Key point: The agency could choose whether to bargain over the proposed equipment.
Full text (FLRA public release)
[ v11 p576 ]
11:0576(93)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
11 FLRA NO. 93
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 3760
Union
and
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
DISABILITY ANALYSIS BRANCH,
FIELD ASSESSMENT OFFICE
Agency
Case No. 0-NG-566
DECISION AND ORDER ON NEGOTIABILITY ISSUE
The petition for review in this case comes before the Authority pursuant to section 7105(a)(2)(E) of the Federal Service Labor - Management Relations Statute (the Statute) and raises issues relating to the negotiability of the following Union proposal.
Each examiner shall have his/her own telephone.
Upon careful consideration of the entire record, including the parties' contentions, the Authority makes the following determination. In agreement with the Agency, the Authority finds that the proposal, by expressly requiring that the Agency provide each examiner with a telephone, clearly concerns the "technology of performing work" within the meaning of section 7106(b)(1) of the Statute. See American Federation of Government Employees, AFL - CIO, Local 1858 and Department of the Army, U.S. Army Missile Command, Redstone Arsenal, Alabama, 10 FLRA No. 74 (1982) (Union Proposal 3) and cases cited therein; American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL - CIO, Local 2477; American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees, AFL - CIO, Local 2910; Congressional Research Employees Association; and Law Library of Congress, United Association of Employees and Library of Congress, Washington, D.C., 7 FLRA No. 89 (1982) (Union Proposal IX). Under section 7106(b)(1), such matters are negotiable only at the election of the Agency. Thus, in light of the Agency's election not to bargain, the Union proposal is nonnegotiable. [ v11 p576 ]
Accordingly, pursuant to section 2424.10 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations, IT IS ORDERED that the Union's petition for review be, and it hereby is, dismissed.
Issued, Washington, D.C., March 10, 1983
Ronald W. Haughton, Chairman
Henry B. Frazier III, Member
Leon B. Applewhaite, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
[ v11 p577 ]
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace