AFGE Local 2840 and Blytheville Air Force Base, Arkansas (Authority decision, March 14, 1980)

Blytheville Air Force Base negotiability appeal dismissed as moot (FLRA 0-NG-221)

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
0-NG-221
Decided
March 14, 1980
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-06

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1980, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1980
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. The Authority dismissed the negotiability petition after the agency withdrew its allegation, leaving no live dispute for this appeal. Judicial review of final Authority orders is governed by 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a).

Plain-English summary

AFGE Local 2840 petitioned for review after Blytheville Air Force Base alleged that disputed matters were outside the duty to bargain. In its statement to the Authority, the agency effectively withdrew that allegation. The Authority held that the withdrawal made the appeal moot and dismissed it. It did not issue a negotiability ruling on the underlying matters.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7117(c)(3).
  • Outcome: Negotiability appeal dismissed as moot.
  • Key point: Withdrawal of the agency's nonnegotiability allegation ended the live dispute.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v02 p915 ]

02:0915(115)NG

The decision of the Authority follows:

2 FLRA No. 115

MR. RONALD D. KING
DIRECTOR
CONTRACT AND APPEALS DIVISION
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO
1325 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, NW.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005

RE: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO, LOCAL 2840 AND
BLYTHEVILLE AIR FORCE BASE,
ARKANSAS, Case No. 0-NG-221

DEAR MR. KING:

THIS REFERS TO THE UNION'S PETITION FOR REVIEW AND THE AGENCY'S
STATEMENT OF POSITION IN THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CASE.

THE AGENCY'S STATEMENT OF POSITION FILED PURSUANT TO SECTION
7117(C)(3) (92 STAT. 1206 (1978)) OF THE STATUTE AND SECTION 2424.6 OF
THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS IN EFFECT WITHDREW THE AGENCY ALLEGATION
THAT THE MATTERS IN DISPUTE ARE NOT WITHIN THE DUTY TO BARGAIN. THE
DISPUTE INVOLVED IN THE UNION'S APPEAL WAS THEREBY RENDERED MOOT.

ACCORDINGLY, THE APPEAL IS DISMISSED.

FOR THE AUTHORITY.

SINCERELY,

SAMUEL A. CHAITOVITZ

EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

CC: D. DRESSER

AIR FORCE

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace