National Treasury Employees Union and U.S. Department of the Treasury, Internal Revenue Service, Chicago, Illinois (Authority decision, July 21, 1989)
Chicago IRS bargaining dispute (FLRA 0-NG-1709): Petition dismissed after deficiencies went uncorrected
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 1989, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Final FLRA decision. The Authority dismisses the union's negotiability petition because it did not respond to an order to correct deficiencies. An aggrieved person may seek judicial review by filing a petition in an appropriate United States court of appeals within 60 days after issuance under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a).
Plain-English summary
The National Treasury Employees Union filed a negotiability petition involving the Internal Revenue Service in Chicago. The Authority identified deficiencies in the filing and gave the union until June 30, 1989, to correct them. It warned that failure to comply could lead to dismissal. The union did not respond. The Authority dismissed the petition under its procedural rule without reaching any negotiability question.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Deficient negotiability petitions under 5 C.F.R. § 2424.4(c)(1).
- Outcome: Union's petition dismissed after it failed to correct the filing deficiencies.
- Key point: The Authority may dismiss a negotiability petition when the petitioner does not respond to an order to correct it.
Full text (FLRA public release)
[ v33 p876 ]
33:0876(122)NG
The decision of the Authority follows:
33 FLRA No. 122
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS
AUTHORITY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
NATIONAL TREASURY EMPLOYEES
UNION
and
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE
TREASURY
INTERNAL REVENUE
SERVICE
CHICAGO, ILLINOIS
0-NG-1709
ORDER
July 21, 1989
On June 21, 1989, the Authority issued an Order granting the National Treasury Employees Union (Union) an opportunity to correct deficiencies in its petition for review of negotiability issues in the above-referenced case.
The Authority's Order stated that the submission must be filed by June 30, 1989, and that failure to comply with the Order may result in dismissal of the Union's petition. 5 C.F.R. § 2424.4(c)(1).
The Union has failed to respond to the Authority's Order of June 21, 1989. Accordingly, the Union's petition for review is dismissed. 5 C.F.R. § 2424.4(c)(1).
For the Authority.
________
Clyde B. Blandford, Jr.
Acting Executive Director
FOOTNOTES:
(If blank, the decision does not
have footnotes.)
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace