Veterans Administration and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 2400 (Authority decision, December 31, 1984)
Veterans Administration and AFGE Local 2400 (FLRA 0-AR-884): Late arbitration exceptions dismissed
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 1984, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Final FLRA decision. This is a final order dismissing exceptions to an arbitration award as untimely. Court review of an order involving an arbitration award is excluded by 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1) unless the order involves an unfair labor practice under § 7116; this order does not address an unfair labor practice.
Plain-English summary
AFGE Local 2400 challenged an arbitrator's award involving the Veterans Administration. The award was dated and apparently mailed on October 2, 1984, making November 5 the deadline for exceptions. The union sent its filing to an FLRA regional office on November 21, and the national office received it on November 28. The Authority rejected the union's argument that the arbitrator's later refusal to amend the award restarted the clock, and dismissed the exceptions as untimely.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Arbitration exception deadline under 5 U.S.C. § 7122(b) and 5 C.F.R. §§ 2425.1, 2429.21, and 2429.22.
- Outcome: The union's exceptions were dismissed as untimely.
- Key point: A later refusal to amend an award does not change the date from which the exception deadline runs.
Full text (FLRA public release)
[ v16 p1157 ]
16:1157(149)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
16 FLRA NO. 149
VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
Activity
and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, LOCAL 2400
Union
Case No. 0-AR-884
ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS
This case is before the Authority on exceptions to the award of Arbitrator Joe D. Woodward filed by the Union pursuant to section 7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor - Management Relations Statute and section 2425.1 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations. For the reasons stated below, it has been determined that the exceptions must be dismissed as untimely filed.
The Arbitrator's award is dated October 2, 1984, and appears to have been served on the parties by mail on the same day.
Under section 7122(b) of the Statute, as amended, 1 and sections 2425.1, 2429.21 and 2429.22 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations, as amended, 2 any exceptions to the Arbitrator's award in this case had to be filed, i.e., received in the Authority's National Office in Washington, D.C., not later than the close of business on November 5, 1984. However, the exceptions were not received in the National Office until November 28, 1984, after having been mistakenly filed with the Authority's Atlanta Regional Office on November 21, 1984. In its submission, the Union in effect asserts that the Arbitrator's award of October 2, 1984, was interlocutory and his final action in the matter was rendered by letter of October 31, 1984. However, in the letter relied upon, the Arbitrator did nothing more than deny the Union's request that he amend [ v16 p1157 ] his October 2, 1984 award. Thus it is clear that the Arbitrator's award in this case was final and not interlocutory on October 2, 1984, and the period for the timely filing of exceptions to the award must be calculated from that date. See Portsmouth Naval Shipyard and Federal Employees Metal Trades Council, AFL - CIO, 15 FLRA No. 28 (1984). Therefore, the Union's exceptions were untimely filed.
Accordingly, as the Union's exceptions were untimely filed, they are hereby dismissed.
For the Authority.
Issued, Washington, D.C., December 31, 1984
Harold D. Kessler, Acting Executive Director/Administrator
[ v16 p1158 ]
FOOTNOTES
Footnote 1 Section 7122(b) of the Statute was
amended by the Civil Service Miscellaneous Amendments Act of 1983 (Pub. L. No. 98-224, 4, 98 Stat. 47, 48 (1984) to provide that the 30-day period for filing exceptions to an arbitrator's award begins on the date the award is served on the filing party.
Footnote 2 49 Fed. Reg. 22623 (1984).
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace