Veterans Administration Medical Center and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1843 (Authority decision, December 18, 1984)

VA Medical Center and AFGE Local 1843 (FLRA 0-AR-810): Laboratory technician grievance barred

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
0-AR-810
Decided
December 18, 1984
Outcome
Set aside
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-05

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1984, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1984
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. This is a final order setting aside an arbitration award. Court review of an order involving an arbitration award is excluded by 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1) unless the order involves an unfair labor practice under § 7116; this order does not address an unfair labor practice.

Plain-English summary

A Veterans Administration Medical Center reclassified laboratory technician positions from GS-7 to GS-6 to correct a classification error. The affected employees qualified for grade and pay retention benefits, but their union filed a grievance challenging the downgrade. An arbitrator ruled that the grievance could proceed to a hearing on its merits. The Authority held that 5 U.S.C. § 5366(b) bars a negotiated grievance over an action that gives rise to those retention benefits, and set aside the arbitrator's ruling.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Grade and pay retention grievance bar under 5 U.S.C. § 5366(b).
  • Outcome: The award finding the grievance arbitrable was set aside.
  • Key point: A reclassification downgrade that creates grade and pay retention benefits is excluded from the negotiated grievance procedure under the cited statute.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v16 p869 ]

16:0869(121)AR

The decision of the Authority follows:

16 FLRA No. 121

VETERANS ADMINISTRATION
MEDICAL CENTER
Activity

and

LOCAL 1843, AMERICAN FEDERATION
OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
Union

Case No. 0-AR-810

DECISION

This matter is before the Authority on an exception to the award of Arbitrator Martin F. Scheinman filed by the Agency under section 7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute and part 2425 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations.

The dispute in this matter concerns the downgrading of certain laboratory technician positions from GS-7 to GS-6 to correct a classification error. The employees affected by the downgrade were entitled to grade and pay retention benefits under 5 U.S.C. Sections 5362-5363. A grievance protesting the reduction-in-grade was filed and submitted to arbitration on the threshold issue of grievability and arbitrability. Rejecting the Activity's argument that this matter was not grievable under 5 U.S.C. Sec. 5366(B) /1/ and under Sec. 7121(c)(5)
/2/ of the Statute, the Arbitrator, as his award, ruled that the grievance was arbitrable and ordered the parties to proceed to arbitration on the merits.

As its exception the Agency contends that the award is contrary to 5 U.S.C. Sec. 5366(b). The Authority agrees.

As noted, section 5366(b) pertinently provides that an action which is the basis of an employee's entitlement to grade and pay retention benefits shall not be grievable under a grievance procedure negotiated under the Statute. The Authority and the courts have expressly recognized that reductions-in-grade made pursuant to position reclassification actions for which grade and pay retention benefits are available are not grievable under a grievance procedure negotiated under the Statute or appealable under statutory appeal procedures. E.g., American Federation of Government Employees, Local 3369, AFL-CIO and Social Security Administration, New York Region, 16 FLRA No. 120 (1984); Atwell v. MSPB, 670 F.2d 272, 285-86 (D.C. Cir. 1981); accord Knepp v. Department of the Navy, 709 F.2d 37 (9th Cir. 1983). In terms of this case, it is clear that the grievance concerns the downgrading action of the grievants' laboratory technician positions as a result of position reclassification for which grade and pay retention benefits were available. Consequently, the grievance is precluded by 5 U.S.C. Sec. 5366(b) and the Arbitrator's award finding the grievance arbitrable is therefore deficient. Accordingly, the award is set aside.

Issued, Washington, D.C., December 18, 1984
/s/ Henry B. Frazier III
Henry B. Frazier III, Acting
Chairman
/s/ Ronald W. Haughton
Ronald W. Haughton, Member
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

--------------- FOOTNOTES$ ---------------

/1/ 5 U.S.C. Sec. 5366(b)(1) provides that "any action which is the basis of an individual's entitlement to benefits under (5 U.S.C. Sections 5362-5363)" is not grievable under a grievance procedure negotiated under the Statute.

/2/ Section 7121(c)(5) provides:

(c) The preceding subsections of this section shall not apply with respect to any grievance concerning--

. . . .

(5) the classification of any position which does not result in the reduction in grade or pay of an employee.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace