National Association of Government Employees, Local R4-6 and U.S. Department of the Army, Army Transportation Center, Fort Eustis, Virginia (Authority decision, March 29, 1999)

NAGE Local R4-6 and Fort Eustis (FLRA 0-AR-3147): arbitration award upheld

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
0-AR-3147
Decided
March 29, 1999
Outcome
Upheld
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-09-30
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1999, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1999
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. This is a final order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority involving an arbitral award under 5 U.S.C. § 7122. Judicial review under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a) generally does not extend to such an order unless the order involves an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116. This decision resolves exceptions to an arbitration award and does not state that it involves an unfair labor practice.

Plain-English summary

NAGE Local R4-6 challenged an arbitration award involving the Army Transportation Center at Fort Eustis. The Authority reviewed the union's exceptions under the statutory standard for setting aside an award and found no qualifying defect. It denied the exceptions, leaving the arbitration award in place. The published decision does not describe the grievance, the arbitrator's ruling, or the union's specific objections.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Arbitration award review under 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a).
  • Outcome: Union exceptions denied; arbitration award left in place.
  • Key point: The Authority found no established statutory ground for setting aside the award.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v55 p328 ]

55 FLRA No. 51

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT

EMPLOYEES, LOCAL R4-6

(Union)

and

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY

ARMY TRANSPORTATION CENTER

FORT EUSTIS, VIRGINIA

(Agency)

0-AR-3147

_____

DECISION

March 29, 1999

_____

Before the Authority: Phyllis N. Segal, Chair; Donald S.
Wasserman and Dale Cabaniss, Members.

This matter is before the Authority on exceptions to an award of Arbitrator Peter A. Veglahn filed by the Union under section 7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) and part 2425 of the Authority's Regulations. The Agency filed an opposition to the Union's exceptions.

Under section 7122(a) of the Statute, an award is deficient if it is contrary to any law, rule, or regulation; or it is deficient on other grounds similar to those applied by Federal courts in private sector labor-management relations. Upon careful consideration of the entire record in this case, the Authority concludes that the award is not deficient on any of the grounds raised in the exceptions and set forth in section 7122(a).

Accordingly, the Union's exceptions are denied.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace