National Association of Government Employees, Local R14-52 and U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Distribution Depot Red River (Authority decision, May 27, 1998)

NAGE Local R14-52 and Red River Depot (FLRA 0-AR-3026): Arbitration exceptions denied

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
0-AR-3026
Decided
May 27, 1998
Outcome
Upheld
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-09-30

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1998, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1998
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. The Authority denies the union's exceptions to an arbitration award, ending this proceeding before the Authority. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1), judicial review of an Authority order involving an arbitration award is generally excluded unless the order involves an unfair labor practice.

Plain-English summary

NAGE Local R14-52 challenged an arbitration award involving the Defense Logistics Agency's Red River depot. The Authority said it had considered the record and found no deficiency under 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a). It denied the union's exceptions. This short release does not identify the grievance, describe the arbitrator's award, or set out the union's specific objections.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Arbitration exceptions under 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a).
  • Outcome: Union's exceptions denied; award left intact.
  • Key point: The published release gives no issue specific reasoning beyond its finding that the award was not deficient.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v54 p211 ]
54:0211(27)AR

The decision of the Authority follows:

54 FLRA No. 27

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

_____

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES

LOCAL R14-52

(Union)

and

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE

DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY

DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION REGION WEST

DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT RED RIVER

(Agency)

0-AR-3026

_____

DECISION

May 27, 1998

_____

Before the Authority: Phyllis N. Segal, Chair; Donald S.

Wasserman and Dale Cabaniss, Members.

This matter is before the Authority on exceptions to an award of Arbitrator Don J. Harr filed by the Union under section 7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) and part 2425 of the Authority's Regulations. The Agency filed an opposition to the Union's exceptions.

Under section 7122(a) of the Statute, an award is deficient if it is contrary to any law, rule, or regulation; or it is deficient on other grounds similar to those applied by Federal courts in private sector labor-management relations. Upon careful consideration of the entire record in this case, the Authority concludes that the award is not deficient on any of the grounds raised in the exceptions and set forth in section 7122(a).

Accordingly, the Union's exceptions are denied.

FOOTNOTES:
(If blank, the decision does not
have footnotes.)

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace