American Federation of Government Employees, Council 214 and U.S. Department of the Air Force, Air Force Materiel Command, Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, Ohio (Authority decision, January 30, 1998)

AFGE Council 214 and Air Force Materiel Command (FLRA 0-AR-3014): arbitration exceptions denied

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
0-AR-3014
Decided
January 30, 1998
Outcome
Upheld
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-09-30
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1998, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1998
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. This is a final order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority involving an arbitral award under 5 U.S.C. § 7122. Judicial review under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a) generally does not extend to such an order unless the order involves an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116. This decision resolves exceptions to an arbitration award and does not state that it involves an unfair labor practice.

Plain-English summary

AFGE Council 214 challenged an arbitration award involving the Air Force Materiel Command at Wright-Patterson Air Force Base. The agency opposed the union's exceptions. The Authority reviewed the challenges under the statutory grounds for finding an arbitration award deficient and found that none established a defect. It denied the exceptions, leaving the award in place. The decision does not describe the underlying grievance or the award's terms.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a).
  • Outcome: Union's exceptions denied; arbitration award left in place.
  • Key point: The union did not establish a ground for setting aside the award.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v53 p1266 ]
53:1266(108)AR

The decision of the Authority follows:

53 FLRA No. 108

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

_____

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES

COUNCIL 214

(Union)

and

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

AIR FORCE MATERIEL COMMAND

WRIGHT-PATTERSON AIR FORCE BASE,
OHIO

(Agency)

0-AR-3014

_____

DECISION

January 30, 1998

_____

Before the Authority: Phyllis N. Segal, Chair; Donald S. Wasserman and Dale Cabaniss, Members.

This matter is before the Authority on exceptions to an award of Arbitrator Louis V. Imundo, Jr. filed by the Union under section 7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) and part 2425 of the Authority's Regulations. The Agency filed an opposition to the Union's exceptions.

Under section 7122(a) of the Statute, an award is deficient if it is contrary to any law, rule, or regulation; or is deficient on other grounds similar to those applied by Federal courts in private sector labor-management relations. Upon careful consideration of the entire record in this case, the Authority concludes that the award is not deficient on any of the grounds raised in the exceptions and set forth in section 7122(a).

Accordingly, the Union's exceptions are denied.

FOOTNOTES:
(If blank, the decision does not
have footnotes.)

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace