U.S. Department of Defense, Defense Logistics Agency, Defense Distribution Depot, San Diego, California and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1399 (Authority decision, April 28, 1998)
Defense Logistics Agency and AFGE Local 1399 (FLRA 0-AR-2898): agency exceptions denied
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 1998, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Final FLRA decision. This is a final order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority involving an arbitral award under 5 U.S.C. § 7122. Judicial review under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a) generally does not extend to such an order unless the order involves an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116. This decision resolves exceptions to an arbitration award and does not state that it involves an unfair labor practice.
Plain-English summary
The Defense Logistics Agency challenged an arbitration award involving its San Diego depot and AFGE Local 1399. The official decision does not describe the grievance, the award, or the agency's specific objections. After reviewing the record under 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a), the Authority found no ground to set the award aside. It denied the agency's exceptions.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: Arbitration award review under 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a).
- Outcome: Agency's exceptions denied; arbitration award left in place.
- Key point: The published order gives no details about the underlying dispute or the rejected objections.
Full text (FLRA public release)
[ v54 p69 ]
54:0069(9)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
54 FLRA No. 9
FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY
WASHINGTON, D.C.
_____
U.S. DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE
DEFENSE LOGISTICS AGENCY
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION REGION WEST
DEFENSE DISTRIBUTION DEPOT
SAN DIEGO, CALIFORNIA
(Agency)
and
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES
LOCAL 1399
(Union)
0-AR-2898
_____
DECISION
April 28, 1998
_____
Before the Authority: Phyllis N. Segal, Chair; Donald S.
Wasserman and Dale Cabaniss, Members.
This matter is before the Authority on exceptions to an award of Arbitrator Edward E. Hales filed by the Agency under section 7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) and part 2425 of the Authority's Regulations. The Union did not file an opposition to the Agency's exceptions.
Under section 7122(a) of the Statute, an award is deficient if it is contrary to any law, rule, or regulation; or it is deficient on other grounds similar to those applied by Federal courts in private sector labor-management relations. Upon careful consideration of the entire record in this case, the Authority concludes that the award is not deficient on any of the grounds raised in the exceptions and set forth in section 7122(a).
Accordingly, the Agency's exceptions are denied.
FOOTNOTES:
(If blank, the decision does not
have footnotes.)
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace