American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1867 and U.S. Department of the Air Force, U.S. Air Force Academy (Authority decision, February 3, 1997)

Air Force Academy and AFGE Local 1867 (FLRA 0-AR-2855): arbitration award stands

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
0-AR-2855
Decided
February 3, 1997
Outcome
Upheld
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-09-30

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1997, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1997
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. The Authority denies the union's exceptions to an arbitration award. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1), an order involving an arbitral award is generally excluded from judicial review unless it involves an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116. This decision does not address an unfair labor practice.

Plain-English summary

AFGE Local 1867 challenged an arbitration award involving the U.S. Air Force Academy. The Authority reviewed the union's exceptions under the rule allowing it to set aside awards that conflict with law, rule, or regulation or are deficient on comparable judicial grounds. It found no such defect and denied the exceptions, leaving the award in place. The published decision does not describe the underlying grievance or the arbitrator's reasoning.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Arbitration review under 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a).
  • Outcome: Union exceptions denied; arbitration award left in place.
  • Key point: The short decision finds no statutory ground to set aside the award and gives no detail about the grievance.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v52 p944 ]
52:0944(95)AR

The decision of the Authority follows:

52 FLRA No. 95

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

WASHINGTON, D.C.

_____

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES

LOCAL 1867

(Union)

and

U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE

U.S. AIR FORCE ACADEMY

(Agency)

0-AR-2855

_____

DECISION

February 3, 1997

_____

Before the Authority: Phyllis N. Segal, Chair; Tony Armendariz and Donald S. Wasserman, Members.

I. Statement of the Case

This matter is before the Authority on exceptions to an award of Arbitrator Hugh R. Catherwood filed by the Union under section 7122(a) of the Federal Service Labor-Management Relations Statute (the Statute) and part 2425 of the Authority's Regulations. The Agency filed an opposition to the Union's exceptions.

Under section 7122(a) of the Statute, an award is deficient if it is contrary to any law, rule, or regulation; or it is deficient on other grounds similar to those applied by Federal courts in private sector labor-management relations. Upon careful consideration of the entire record in this case, the Authority concludes that the award is not deficient on any of the grounds set forth in section 7122(a).

Accordingly, the Union's exceptions are denied.

FOOTNOTES:
(If blank, the decision does not
have footnotes.)

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace