Air Force, Scott Air Force Base, Illinois (Activity) and National Association of Government Employees, Local R7-23 (Union) (Authority decision, April 29, 1981)
Scott Air Force Base arbitration exceptions dismissed as late (FLRA 0-AR-210)
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 1981, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Final FLRA decision. This order concerns exceptions to an arbitration award under 5 U.S.C. § 7122. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1), such orders are generally excluded from judicial review unless they involve an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116; this decision does not state that it involves one.
Plain-English summary
A union challenged a Scott Air Force Base arbitration award dated February 23, 1981. Its exceptions were due March 24 but were filed March 26. The Authority dismissed them as untimely without reaching the merits.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a).
- Outcome: Arbitration exceptions dismissed as untimely.
- Key point: The Authority could not waive the filing limit.
Full text (FLRA public release)
[ v05 p552 ]
05:0552(68)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
5 FLRA No. 68
DEPARTMENT OF THE AIR FORCE
SCOTT AIR FORCE BASE, ILLINOIS
Activity
and
LOCAL R7-23, NATIONAL ASSOCIATION
OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
Union
Case No. 0-AR-210
ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS
ON MARCH 26, 1981, LOCAL R7-23, NATIONAL FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES (THE UNION) FILED EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD OF ARBITRATOR THOMAS
J. ERBS IN THE INSTANT CASE WITH THE AUTHORITY, PURSUANT TO SECTION
2425.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R. 2425.1(1980)). FOR THE
REASONS INDICATED BELOW, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT THE SUBJECT
EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R.
2425.1(B)(1980))PROVIDES:
THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING AN EXCEPTION TO AN ARBITRATION AWARD IS
THIRTY (30) DAYS
BEGINNING ON THE DATE OF THE AWARD.
THE SUBJECT ARBITRATION AWARD, AS INCLUDED IN THE UNION'S SUBMISSION,
IS DATED FEBRUARY 23, 1981. THEREFORE, UNDER SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE
AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS, THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE DUE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE AUTHORITY NO LATER THAN MARCH 24, 1981. HOWEVER, AS STATED
ABOVE, THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE NOT FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY UNTIL
MARCH 26, 1981. IN THIS REGARD, THE AUTHORITY IS NOT EMPOWERED TO
EXTEND OR WAIVE THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING EXCEPTIONS TO ARBITRATORS'
AWARDS.
ACCORDINGLY, AS THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED, AND APART
FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, THE UNION'S APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED.
FOR THE AUTHORITY.
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., APRIL 29, 1981
JAMES J. SHEPARD, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace