Kelly Air Force Base, San Antonio Air Logistics Center and American Federation of Government Employees, Council 214 (Authority decision, April 29, 1988)

Kelly Air Force Base and AFGE Council 214 (FLRA 0-AR-1541): Late arbitration exceptions dismissed

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
0-AR-1541
Decided
April 29, 1988
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-04

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1988, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1988
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. The Authority dismisses the union's exceptions to an arbitration award as untimely. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1), an order involving an arbitral award is generally excluded from judicial review unless it involves an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116. This decision does not decide an unfair labor practice.

Plain-English summary

AFGE Council 214 sent exceptions to an arbitration award to an Authority regional office in Dallas rather than the national office in Washington. The Authority determined that the filing fell outside the statutory period for arbitration exceptions. It dismissed the exceptions without reaching the merits of the award.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7122(b); 5 C.F.R. §§ 2425.1 and 2429.21(b).
  • Outcome: Union's arbitration exceptions dismissed as untimely.
  • Key point: Exceptions to an arbitration award must be filed at the Authority's national office within the prescribed period.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v31 p1298 ]

31:1298(121)AR

The decision of the Authority follows:

31 FLRA NO. 121
31 FLRA 1298 (1988)

29 APR 1988

KELLY AIR FORCE BASE
SAN ANTONIO AIR LOGISTICS CENTER

Activity

and

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFGE COUNCIL
No. 214, AFL-CIO

Union

Case No. 0-AR-1541

ORDER

The union has filed with the Authority exceptions to the award of Arbitrator Edward F. O'Brien pursuant to 5 U.S.C. 7122(a) and 5 C.F.R. 2425.1. The Union's exceptions are untimely and must be dismissed.

The Arbitrator's award is dated March 4, 1988. The Union's exceptions: (1) are dated April 6, 1988; (2) were misdirected to Region 6 of the Federal Labor Relations Authority in Dallas, Texas in an envelope postmarked April 7, 1988; 1 (3) were forwarded to the Authority by the Dallas Region by letter dated April 13, 1988, which was received April 18, 1988; and (4) were filed with the Authority on that same date by operation of 5 C.F.R. 2429.21(b), which provides that if no postmark date is evident on the mailing, it is presumed to have been mailed 5 days prior to receipt. 2 [PAGE]

The time limit for filing an exception to an arbitration award is 30 days beginning on the date the award is served on the filing party. 5 U.S.C. 7122(b), as amended, 3 and 5 C.F.R. 2425.1, as amended. 4 ate of service is the day when the matter served is deposited in the U.S. mail or is delivered in person. 5 C.F.R. 2429.27(d) (1987). The Arbitrator's award is dated March 4, 1988, and, in the absence of evidence to the contrary, it is concluded that the award was served on the parties by mail that same day. Whenever a party is served by mail, 5 days are added to the prescribed period for filing the exception. 5 C.F.R. 2429.22 (1987). Therefore, in order to be timely filed, any exceptions to Arbitrator O'Brien's award had to be either mailed to the national office of the Authority in Washington, D.C., and postmarked by the U.S. Postal Service no later than April 11, 1988, or if filed in person, received at the Authority's national office no later than the close of business that same date. 5 C.F.R. 2429.21(b), as amended. 5 However, the Union's exceptions were filed on April 13, 1988.

Accordingly, as the Union's exceptions were untimely filed, they are dismissed.

For the Authority.

Issued, Washington, D.C., April 29, 1988.

Jacqueline R. Bradley
Executive Director

FOOTNOTES

Footnote 1 It is well established that exceptions to an Arbitrator's award cannot be filed at a Regional Office, but must be filed with the Authority at its national office in Washington, D.C. See The Panama Canal commission and Maritime Metal Trades Council, AFL-CIO, 21 FLRA 303, 305 at n.5 (1986).

Footnote 2 A discussion of the method for determining the date of filing in the absence of a postmark is found in Veterans Administration, veterans Administration Medical Center, Muskogee, Oklahoma, 29 FLRA. 51 (1987).

Footnote 3 Section 7122(b) of 5 U.S.C. was amended by the Civil Service Miscellaneous Amendments Act of 1983 (pub. L. No. 98-224, SS 4, 98 Stat. 47, 48 (1984)) to provide that the 30-day period for filing exceptions to an arbitrator's award begins on the date the award is served on the filing party.

Footnote 4 49 Fed. Reg. 22623 (1984). The amendments to section 2425.1 of 5 C.F.R. are applicable to exceptions pending or filed with the Authority on or after March 2, 1984.

Footnote 5 51 Fed. Reg. 45751 (1986). The amendments to section 2429.21 of 5 C.F.R. are applicable to exceptions pending or filed with the Authority on or after December 31, 1986.

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace