American Federation of Government Employees, Local 147 and Social Security Administration, Palm Springs Office (Authority decision, March 26, 1979)
Palm Springs arbitration petition denied as late (FLRA 0-AR-14)
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 1979, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Final FLRA decision. The Authority denies an untimely petition for review of an arbitration award. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1), an order involving an arbitral award is generally excluded from judicial review unless it involves an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116. This decision does not address an unfair labor practice.
Plain-English summary
AFGE Local 147 petitioned the Authority to review an arbitration award involving the Social Security Administration's Palm Springs office. The award was dated January 30, 1979. The Authority said an exception was due March 1 under the statutory 30-day limit, but the union filed on March 6. Because the Authority could not extend or waive that deadline, it denied the petition without considering the award's merits.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7122(b).
- Outcome: Petition for review denied as untimely.
- Key point: The statutory period for arbitration exceptions had expired before the petition was filed.
Full text (FLRA public release)
[ v01 p115 ]
01:0115(9)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
1 FLRA No. 9
MARCH 26, 1979
MR. PETER B. BROIDA
SUPERVISORY TRIAL ATTORNEY
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO
1325 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005
RE: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,
COUNCIL OF DISTRICT OFFICE LOCALS, LOCAL 147
AND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND
WELFARE, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SAN
FRANCISCO REGION, PALM SPRINGS OFFICE
(LEVENTHAL, ARBITRATOR), Case No. 0-AR-14
DEAR MR. BROIDA:
THIS REFERS TO YOUR PETITION FOR REVIEW OF THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD IN
THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CASE, FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY ON MARCH 6, 1979.
FOR THE REASONS INDICATED BELOW, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT YOUR
PETITION WAS UNTIMELY FILED AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.
SECTION 7112 OF THE FEDERAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (92
STAT. 1212), AS HERE PERTINENT, PROVIDES:
(A) EITHER PARTY TO ARBITRATION UNDER THIS CHAPTER MAY FILE WITH THE
AUTHORITY AN EXCEPTION
TO ANY ARBITRATOR'S AWARD PURSUANT TO ARBITRATION . . .
(B) IF NO EXCEPTION TO AN ARBITRATOR'S AWARD IS FILED UNDER
SUBSECTION (A) OF THIS SECTION
DURING THE 30-DAY PERIOD BEGINNING ON THE DATE OF SUCH AWARD, THE
AWARD SHALL BE FINAL AND
BINDING . . .
THE SUBJECT ARBITRATION AWARD IS DATED JANUARY 30, 1979. THEREFORE,
UNDER SECTION 7122(B) OF THE STATUTE, YOUR APPEAL WAS DUE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE AUTHORITY ON MARCH 1, 1979. HOWEVER, AS STATED ABOVE, YOUR
APPEAL WAS NOT FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY UNTIL MARCH 6, 1979, AND THE
AUTHORITY IS NOT EMPOWERED TO EXTEND OR WAIVE THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED
BY THE CITED SECTION OF THE STATUTE.
ACCORDINGLY, AS YOUR PETITION FOR REVIEW WAS UNTIMELY FILED, AND PART
FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, THE PETITION IS DENIED.
FOR THE AUTHORITY.
SINCERELY,
HAROLD D. KESSLER
DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
CC: W. SCHUERHOLZ
SSA
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace