American Federation of Government Employees, Local 147 and Social Security Administration, Palm Springs Office (Authority decision, March 26, 1979)

Palm Springs arbitration petition denied as late (FLRA 0-AR-14)

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
0-AR-14
Decided
March 26, 1979
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-06
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1979, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1979
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. The Authority denies an untimely petition for review of an arbitration award. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1), an order involving an arbitral award is generally excluded from judicial review unless it involves an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116. This decision does not address an unfair labor practice.

Plain-English summary

AFGE Local 147 petitioned the Authority to review an arbitration award involving the Social Security Administration's Palm Springs office. The award was dated January 30, 1979. The Authority said an exception was due March 1 under the statutory 30-day limit, but the union filed on March 6. Because the Authority could not extend or waive that deadline, it denied the petition without considering the award's merits.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7122(b).
  • Outcome: Petition for review denied as untimely.
  • Key point: The statutory period for arbitration exceptions had expired before the petition was filed.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v01 p115 ]

01:0115(9)AR

The decision of the Authority follows:

1 FLRA No. 9
MARCH 26, 1979

MR. PETER B. BROIDA
SUPERVISORY TRIAL ATTORNEY
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO
1325 MASSACHUSETTS AVENUE, N.W.
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20005

RE: AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES,
COUNCIL OF DISTRICT OFFICE LOCALS, LOCAL 147
AND DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH, EDUCATION, AND
WELFARE, SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION, SAN
FRANCISCO REGION, PALM SPRINGS OFFICE
(LEVENTHAL, ARBITRATOR), Case No. 0-AR-14

DEAR MR. BROIDA:

THIS REFERS TO YOUR PETITION FOR REVIEW OF THE ARBITRATOR'S AWARD IN
THE ABOVE-ENTITLED CASE, FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY ON MARCH 6, 1979.

FOR THE REASONS INDICATED BELOW, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED THAT YOUR
PETITION WAS UNTIMELY FILED AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED FOR REVIEW.

SECTION 7112 OF THE FEDERAL LABOR-MANAGEMENT RELATIONS STATUTE (92
STAT. 1212), AS HERE PERTINENT, PROVIDES:

(A) EITHER PARTY TO ARBITRATION UNDER THIS CHAPTER MAY FILE WITH THE
AUTHORITY AN EXCEPTION

TO ANY ARBITRATOR'S AWARD PURSUANT TO ARBITRATION . . .

(B) IF NO EXCEPTION TO AN ARBITRATOR'S AWARD IS FILED UNDER
SUBSECTION (A) OF THIS SECTION

DURING THE 30-DAY PERIOD BEGINNING ON THE DATE OF SUCH AWARD, THE
AWARD SHALL BE FINAL AND

BINDING . . .

THE SUBJECT ARBITRATION AWARD IS DATED JANUARY 30, 1979. THEREFORE,
UNDER SECTION 7122(B) OF THE STATUTE, YOUR APPEAL WAS DUE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE AUTHORITY ON MARCH 1, 1979. HOWEVER, AS STATED ABOVE, YOUR
APPEAL WAS NOT FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY UNTIL MARCH 6, 1979, AND THE
AUTHORITY IS NOT EMPOWERED TO EXTEND OR WAIVE THE TIME LIMIT PRESCRIBED
BY THE CITED SECTION OF THE STATUTE.

ACCORDINGLY, AS YOUR PETITION FOR REVIEW WAS UNTIMELY FILED, AND PART
FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, THE PETITION IS DENIED.

FOR THE AUTHORITY.

SINCERELY,

HAROLD D. KESSLER

DEPUTY EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

CC: W. SCHUERHOLZ

SSA

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace