Social Security Administration and National Council of SSA Field Operations Locals, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO (Authority decision, March 6, 1987)

SSA supplemental agreement ratification (FLRA 0-AR-1167): Reconsideration denied

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
0-AR-1167
Decided
March 6, 1987
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-05

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1987, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1987
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. This is a final order of the Federal Labor Relations Authority denying reconsideration of its arbitration decision. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1), orders involving arbitral awards are generally excluded from judicial review unless they involve an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116. This decision does not state that it involves one.

Plain-English summary

The Social Security Administration asked the Authority to reconsider its approval of a contract provision giving the union a chance to ratify a supplemental agreement. The provision required the parties to meet again if the union rejected the agreement. The agency argued that the Authority should ask the Federal Service Impasses Panel whether the arbitrator had authority to impose a final resolution. The Authority found no extraordinary circumstances for reconsideration. It held that the agency was repeating its disagreement with the earlier ruling and denied the request.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: Impasse resolution under 5 U.S.C. § 7119(c)(5)(B) and reconsideration under 5 C.F.R. § 2429.17.
  • Outcome: Agency request for reconsideration denied.
  • Key point: A request to revisit the merits of a ratification provision did not establish extraordinary circumstances for reconsideration.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v26 p57 ]
V

The decision of the Authority follows:

26 FLRA No. 6

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

Agency

and

NATIONAL COUNCIL OF SSA FIELD
OPERATIONS LOCALS (NCSSAFOL)
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO (AFGE)

Union

Case No. 0-AR-1167
(25 FLRA No. 17)

ORDER DENYING REQUEST FOR RECONSIDERATION

This matter is before the Authority on a request filed by the Agency seeking reconsideration of a portion of the Authority's decision of January 20, 1987. In that decision we denied two of the Agency's three exceptions and all of the union's exceptions to the Arbitrator's interest arbitration award. With regard to the remaining Agency exception, we set aside that part of the award concerning Article 9, section 7.G.3., because the Arbitrator improperly resolved a negotiability dispute. The Agency is seeking reconsideration of the part of the decision which denied its exception which contended that the Arbitrator's award of union ratification rights was contrary to section 7119(c)(5)(B) of the Statute.

The agreement provision which the Arbitrator ordered and to which the Agency excepted reads as follows:

In the event the union fails to ratify the Supplemental Agreement, the parties will meet within 60 days to renegotiate those portions specified by the union.

We denied the Agency's exception that the award of this provision violated section 7119(c)(5)(B). We concluded that nothing in the Statute prohibits parties from including a provision for union ratification of an agreement before it becomes final. In its request for reconsideration of this decision, the Agency argues that extraordinary circumstances exist because there is a question as to whether the Federal Service Impasses Panel (the Panel) intended in this case to use interest arbitration to bring the impasse to a final conclusion. The Agency argues that because of this question, the Authority should solicit and consider the views of the Panel to determine whether the Arbitrator was authorized to impose a final resolution on the parties.

Section 2429.17 of the Authority's Rules and Regulations permits a party that can establish "extraordinary circumstances" to request reconsideration of a decision of the Authority. Here, however, we conclude that the Agency has not established "extraordinary circumstances" within the meaning of section 2429.17. Rather, the arguments presented by the Agency in support of its request constitute nothing more than disagreement with the merits of the Authority's decision and an attempt to relitigate the matter.

Accordingly, the Agency's request for reconsideration is denied.

Issued, Washington, D.C., March 6, 1987.

Jerry L. Calhoun, Chairman

Henry B. Frazier III, Member

Jean McKee, Member

FEDERAL LABOR RELATIONS AUTHORITY

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace