American Federation of Government Employees, Social Security Local #1760 (Union) and Social Security Administration, Northeastern Program Service Center, Flushing, New York (Activity) (Authority decision, July 10, 1980)

Social Security arbitration exceptions dismissed as late (FLRA 0-AR-115)

Decision type
Authority decision
Docket
0-AR-115
Decided
July 10, 1980
Outcome
Procedural
Precedential status
Citable Authority precedent
Checked against source
2026-10-06
Cited standards

Apply this precedent to your situation

This is citable Authority precedent from 1980, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.

Currency note: this decision dates from 1980
The federal labor-relations law may have been amended, and later Authority or court decisions may have changed the analysis since then. Treat this page as historical context, not current advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.
About this page: The plain-English summary and decision snapshot below were written by Ezel based on the official FLRA release. The full text is the agency's own release.
Read the official release (flra.gov)

Final FLRA decision. This order concerns exceptions to an arbitration award under 5 U.S.C. § 7122. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1), such orders are generally excluded from judicial review unless they involve an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116; this decision does not state that it involves one.

Plain-English summary

An AFGE local filed exceptions to a Social Security arbitration award after the filing deadline. The Authority applied its arbitration filing rule and found the exceptions untimely. It dismissed them without reviewing the award’s merits.

Decision snapshot

  • Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a).
  • Outcome: Exceptions dismissed as untimely.
  • Key point: The filing deadline prevented merits review of the award.

Full text (FLRA public release)

[ v03 p629 ]

03:0629(102)AR

The decision of the Authority follows:

3 FLRA No. 102

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, SOCIAL SECURITY LOCAL #1760
(Union)

and

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
NORTHEASTERN PROGRAM SERVICE CENTER,
FLUSHING, NEW YORK
(Activity)

Case No. 0-AR-115

ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS

ON JUNE 24, 1980, LOCAL 1760, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO (THE UNION), FILED EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD OF
ARBITRATOR JESSE SIMONS IN THE INSTANT CASE WITH THE AUTHORITY, PURSUANT
TO SECTION 2425.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R.
2425.1(1980)). FOR THE REASONS INDICATED BELOW, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED
THAT THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED
FOR REVIEW.

SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R.
2425.1(B)(1980)) PROVIDES:

THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING AN EXCEPTION TO AN ARBITRATION AWARD IS
THIRTY (30) DAYS

BEGINNING ON THE DATE OF THE AWARD.

THE SUBJECT ARBITRATION AWARD, AS INCLUDED IN THE UNION'S SUBMISSION,
IS DATED MAY 22, 1980. THEREFORE, UNDER SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE
AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS, THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE DUE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE AUTHORITY NO LATER THAN JUNE 20, 1980. HOWEVER, AS STATED ABOVE,
THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE NOT FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY UNTIL JUNE 24,
1980. IN THIS REGARD, THE AUTHORITY IS NOT EMPOWERED TO EXTEND OR WAIVE
THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING EXCEPTIONS TO ARBITRATORS' AWARDS.

ACCORDINGLY, AS THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED, AND APART
FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, THE UNION'S APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED.

FOR THE AUTHORITY.

ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JULY 10, 1980

SAMUEL A. CHAITOVITZ, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR

SERVICE SHEET

COPIES OF THE AUTHORITY'S ORDER OF JULY 10, 1980, IN CASE NO.
O-AR-115, SENT TO THE FOLLOWING:

MR. HERBERT COLLENDER

PRESIDENT, LOCAL 1760

AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT

EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO

P.O. BOX 626

CORONA-ELMHURST, NEW YORK 11373

MR. JULIAN BERGMAN

LABOR RELATIONS SPECIALIST

NORTHEASTERN PROGRAM SERVICE CENTER

SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION

96-05 HORACE HARDING EXPRESSWAY

FLUSHING, NEW YORK 11368

Does this precedent still control your case?

Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace