Community Services Administration (Agency) and National Council of CSA Locals, American Federation of Government Employees, AFL-CIO (Union) (Authority decision, June 27, 1980)
Community Services arbitration exceptions dismissed as late (FLRA 0-AR-106)
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 1980, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Final FLRA decision. This order concerns exceptions to an arbitration award under 5 U.S.C. § 7122. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1), such orders are generally excluded from judicial review unless they involve an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116; this decision does not state that it involves one.
Plain-English summary
The Community Services Administration filed exceptions to an arbitration award and requested a stay. The Authority found the exceptions were filed after its deadline and could not be accepted for review. It dismissed the exceptions without deciding their merits.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a).
- Outcome: Agency exceptions dismissed as untimely.
- Key point: The arbitration filing deadline barred review.
Full text (FLRA public release)
[ v03 p528 ]
03:0528(84)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
3 FLRA No. 84
COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
(Agency)
and
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CSA LOCALS,
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO
(Union)
Case No. 0-AR-106
ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS
ON MAY 29, 1980, COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION (THE AGENCY) FILED
EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD OF ARBITRATOR SEYMOUR STRONGIN IN THE INSTANT
CASE WITH THE AUTHORITY, PURSUANT TO SECTION 2425.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S
REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R. 2425.1(1980)). THE AGENCY ALSO REQUESTED A STAY
OF THE AWARD. FOR THE REASONS INDICATED BELOW, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED
THAT THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED
FOR REVIEW.
SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R.
2425.1(B)(1980)) PROVIDES:
THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING AN EXCEPTION TO AN ARBITRATION AWARD IS
THIRTY (30) DAYS
BEGINNING ON THE DATE OF THE AWARD.
THE SUBJECT ARBITRATION AWARD, AS INCLUDED IN THE AGENCY'S
SUBMISSION, IS DATED APRIL 29, 1980. THEREFORE, UNDER SECTION 2425.1(B)
OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS, THE AGENCY'S EXCEPTIONS WERE DUE IN THE
OFFICE OF THE AUTHORITY NO LATER THAN MAY 28, 1980. HOWEVER, AS STATED
ABOVE, THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE NOT FILED WITH THE AUTHORITY UNTIL
MAY 29, 1980. IN THIS REGARD, THE AUTHORITY IS NOT EMPOWERED TO EXTEND
OR WAIVE THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING EXCEPTIONS TO ARBITRATORS' AWARDS.
ACCORDINGLY, AS THE AGENCY'S EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED, AND
APART FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, THE AGENCY'S APPEAL AND REQUEST FOR A
STAY ARE HEREBY DISMISSED.
FOR THE AUTHORITY.
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JUNE 27, 1980
SAMUEL A. CHAITOVITZ, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SERVICE SHEET
COPIES OF THE AUTHORITY'S ORDER DATED JUNE 27, 1980, IN CASE NO.
O-AR-106, SENT TO THE FOLLOWING:
MR. ROGERS DAVIS, CHIEF
LABOR MANAGEMENT RELATIONS
COMMUNITY SERVICES ADMINISTRATION
WASHINGTON, D.C. 20506
MR. BERNARD S. HOROWITZ
CHIEF STEWARD
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF CSA LOCALS
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO
101 MARIETTA STREET
ATLANTA, GEORGIA 30323
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace