Headquarters, 323rd Flying Training Wing, Mather Air Force Base, California (Activity) and American Federation of Government Employees, Local 1692 (Union) (Authority decision, June 26, 1980)
Mather Air Force arbitration exceptions dismissed as late (FLRA 0-AR-102)
Apply this precedent to your situation
This is citable Authority precedent from 1980, and it may have been appealed since. Ezel checks how it stands today and answers your situation, with citations.
Final FLRA decision. This order concerns exceptions to an arbitration award under 5 U.S.C. § 7122. Under 5 U.S.C. § 7123(a)(1), such orders are generally excluded from judicial review unless they involve an unfair labor practice under 5 U.S.C. § 7116; this decision does not state that it involves one.
Plain-English summary
An AFGE local sought review of an arbitration award involving Mather Air Force Base. The Authority found its exceptions untimely and could not accept them for review. The award’s merits were not decided.
Decision snapshot
- Authority: 5 U.S.C. § 7122(a).
- Outcome: Union exceptions dismissed as untimely.
- Key point: The arbitration filing deadline was dispositive.
Full text (FLRA public release)
[ v03 p475 ]
03:0475(73)AR
The decision of the Authority follows:
3 FLRA No. 73
HEADQUARTERS, 323RD FLYING
TRAINING WING, MATHER AIR
FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA
(Activity)
and
LOCAL 1692, AMERICAN FEDERATION
OF GOVERNMENT EMPLOYEES
(Union)
Case No. 0-AR-102
ORDER DISMISSING EXCEPTIONS
ON MAY 27, 1980, LOCAL 1692, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO (THE UNION), FILED EXCEPTIONS TO THE AWARD OF
ARBITRATOR CORNELIUS J. PECK IN THE INSTANT CASE WITH THE AUTHORITY,
PURSUANT TO SECTION 2425.1 OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R.
2425.1(1980)). FOR THE REASONS INDICATED BELOW, IT HAS BEEN DETERMINED
THAT THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED AND CANNOT BE ACCEPTED
FOR REVIEW.
SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS (5 C.F.R.
2425.1(B)(1980)) PROVIDES:
THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING AN EXCEPTION TO AN ARBITRATION AWARD IS
THIRTY (30) DAYS
BEGINNING ON THE DATE OF THE AWARD.
THE SUBJECT ARBITRATION AWARD, AS INCLUDED IN THE UNION'S SUBMISSION,
IS DATED APRIL 22, 1980. THEREFORE, UNDER SECTION 2425.1(B) OF THE
AUTHORITY'S REGULATIONS, THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE DUE IN THE OFFICE
OF THE AUTHORITY NO LATER THAN MAY 21, 1980. HOWEVER, AS STATED ABOVE,
THE SUBJECT EXCEPTIONS WERE NOT FILED WITHIN THE AUTHORITY UNTIL MAY 27,
1980. IN THIS REGARD, THE AUTHORITY IS NOT EMPOWERED TO EXTEND OR WAIVE
THE TIME LIMIT FOR FILING EXCEPTIONS TO ARBITRATORS' AWARDS.
ACCORDINGLY, AS THE UNION'S EXCEPTIONS WERE UNTIMELY FILED, AND APART
FROM OTHER CONSIDERATIONS, THE UNION'S APPEAL IS HEREBY DISMISSED.
FOR THE AUTHORITY.
ISSUED, WASHINGTON, D.C., JUNE 26, 1980
SAMUEL A. CHAITOVITZ, EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR
SERVICE SHEET
COPIES OF THE AUTHORITY'S ORDER DATED JUNE 26, 1980, IN CASE NO.
O-AR-102, SENT TO THE FOLLOWING:
MR. HOWARD E. BERRYMAN
PRESIDENT, LOCAL 1692
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF GOVERNMENT
EMPLOYEES, AFL-CIO
MATHER AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA 95655
MR. JAMES E. GREENE
HEADQUARTERS, 323RD FLYING TRAINING
WING
MATHER AIR FORCE BASE, CALIFORNIA 95655
Does this precedent still control your case?
Ezel checks whether it still stands, including any court review since, and applies it to your situation with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace