Could a new Washington governor designate a different Human Rights Commission chair while the prior chair remained a commissioner?

Short answer The Attorney General said yes in 1985. Commissioners had fixed terms and cause-based removal protection, but the chair designation had no fixed term and could be changed by the governor without removing the former chair from the commission.
State
Washington
Opinion
AGO 1985 No. 6
Issued
March 1, 1985
Issued by
Washington State Office of the Attorney General
Requested by
Honorable George Fleming and Honorable Phil Talmadge, Washington State Senators

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1985. Ask about yours and see what current Washington law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Washington State Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Washington attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Washington Attorney General concluded in 1985 that a governor could designate any sitting Human Rights Commission member as chair, even if the previous governor had named someone else who still served on the commission. The opinion treated the member’s fixed term and the chair designation as separate: “it is the appointment, and not the designation, which is subject to Senate confirmation.”

The AG said a commissioner could be removed from the commission only for the statutory causes and after the stated process. But the statute gave no fixed term to the chair designation, so the governor could change that designation without ending the person’s commission membership.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1985. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Could the governor choose a new chair before the old chair’s commission term expired?
Yes. The opinion said the chair designation had no statutory fixed term.

Did the former chair lose the commission seat?
No. The AG distinguished a change in chair from removal as a commissioner.

Was the chair designation itself subject to Senate confirmation?
The opinion said confirmation attached to the commission appointment, not the chair designation.

Background and statutory framework

Two senators asked about a prior governor’s chair designation. The AG read RCW 49.60.050, which authorized the governor to designate a chair, alongside RCW 49.60.060, which set member terms and removal conditions.

Citations and references

  • Statutes discussed: RCW 49.60.050; RCW 49.60.060.

Source

Original opinion text

Attorney General Ken Eikenberry

OFFICES AND OFFICERS ‑- STATE ‑- HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION ‑- GOVERNOR ‑- LEGISLATURE ‑- TENURE OF HUMAN RIGHTS COMMISSION CHAIRPERSON

Under the provisions of RCW 49.60.050 the Governor may designate as chairperson of the Washington State Human Rights Commission any member thereof, notwithstanding a previous Governor's designation of a different sitting commissioner as chairperson.


March 1, 1985

Honorable George Fleming
State Senator, 37th District
312 Legislative Building
Olympia, Washington 98504

Honorable Phil Talmadge
State Senator, 34th District
432 Public Lands Building
Olympia, Washington 98504

Cite as: AGO 1985 No. 6

Dear Sirs:

By recent letter you directed our attention to the provisions of RCW 49.60.050, relating to the Washington Board Against Discrimination (now known and designated as the "Washington State Human Rights Commission" pursuant to § 2, chapter 52, Laws of 1971, 1st Ex. Sess.). That statute reads, in full, as follows:

"There is created the 'Washington state board against discrimination,' which shall be composed of five members to be appointed by the governor with the advice and consent of the senate, one of whom shall be designated as chairman by the governor."

You then asked for our opinion on the following question:

"Under the cited statute, may the Governor designate as chairman any member the Governor wishes notwithstanding a previous Governor's designation of a different sitting commissioner as chairman?"

[[Orig. Op. Page 2]]

We answer your question in the affirmative.

ANALYSIS

Also to be noted, in connection with your question, is RCW 49.60.060 which reads:

"One of the original members of the board shall be appointed for a term of one year, one for a term of two years, one for a term of three years, one for a term of four years, one for a term of five years, but their successors shall be appointed for terms of five years each, except that any individual chosen to fill a vacancy shall be appointed only for the unexpired term of the member whom he succeeds.

"A member shall be eligible for reappointment.

"A vacancy in the board shall be filled within thirty days, the remaining members to exercise all powers of the board.

"Any member of the board may be removed by the governor for inefficiency, neglect of duty, misconduct or malfeasance in office, after being given a written statement of the charges and an opportunity to be heard thereon."

Thus, of course, there can be no doubt that members of the Human Rights Commission serve fixed terms, as such‑-removable only for cause. In addition, by virtue of a 1981 amendment to RCW 49.60.050, supra, their appointments to the Commission are now subject to Senate confirmation. See, § 9, chapter 338, Laws of 1981.

But, by the same token, there is clearly nothing in the subject statutes which purports to say that a particular member of the Commission who the Governor has designated as chairman is, as a consequence, to continue serving inthat capacity as well‑-for the remainder of his or her term as a member of the Commission. "Cause," as defined in RCW 49.60.060, is necessary in order to remove a member from the Commission. As we read the provisions of RCW 49.60.050, supra, however, the tenure of a Commission member as chairman is entirely dependent upon the will of the Governor from time to time‑-whoever that Governor may be.

[[Orig. Op. Page 3]]

The basic point, quite simply, is that two distinct functions are involved. The Governorappoints individuals to the Human Rights Commission for statutorily fixed terms, subject to Senate confirmation. And then, from time to time, the Governor designates one of the individuals so appointed to serve as chairman of the Commission. But it is the appointment, and not the designation, which is subject to Senate confirmation.

We are aware of the fact that, in the particular situation giving rise to your request, the Journal of the Senate speaks of ". . . the apointment [appointment], of Symone B. Scales as chairman of the Human Rights Commission . . ." See, Senate Journal, 1981, pages 867 and 403. The use of that terminology, in turn, appears to have stemmed from then Governor Spellman's transmittal letter to the Senate, dated November 5, 1981, which, as set forth on page 11 of the same Senate Journal, read, in material part, as follows:

"I have the honor to submit the following appointment, subject to your confirmation:

"MS. SYMONE B. SCALES, appointed August 26, 1981, for a term ending June 17, 1986, succeeding Winnefred Duncan as Chairman of the Human Rights Commission."

By that letter, however, the Governor was merely identifying the position on the Commission to which he was appointing Ms. Scales; i.e., as the position vacated by the member of the Commission who previously served as chairman. Moreover, in any event, even if the Senate somehow also thought it was confirming the Governor's designation of the appointee as chair of the Commission that still would make no difference. A Governor may, of course, remove at will even one who is subject to Senate confirmation (and who has been confirmed) where the position from which the person is being removed does not carry with it a fixed term; e.g., the Chief of the State Patrol, the Directors of Commerce and Economic Development, OFM, Ecology, etc. Thus, the determining factor is not that of Senate confirmation but, rather, it is the presence or absence of a fixed term. And, while the legislature has provided for fixed terms for members of the Human Rights Commission it has not so provided for the Governor's designee as chairman.

[[Orig. Op. Page 4]]

We trust that the foregoing will be of assistance to you.

Very truly yours,
KENNETH O. EIKENBERRY
Attorney General

PHILIP H. AUSTIN
Senior Deputy Attorney General

What does Washington law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1985. Ezel checks the current Washington statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace