Did permanently affixing a Washington mobile home automatically exempt it from the 1972 mobile-home excise tax?

Short answer No. The AG said the exemption applied if the qualifying home had previously been entered and assessed on the real-property rolls under the special procedure. Merely affixing it, or its automatic 1972 placement for later property taxes, did not remove the 1972 excise tax.
State
Washington
Opinion
AGO 1972 No. 13
Issued
July 19, 1972
Issued by
Washington State Office of the Attorney General
Requested by
Honorable Gary M. Odegaard, State Senator, 20th District

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1972. Ask about yours and see what current Washington law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Washington State Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Washington attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

Washington’s AG distinguished two permanently affixed mobile homes for the 1972 tax year. A home already placed and assessed on the county real-property rolls under the special mobile-home procedure was exempt from that year’s excise tax. A home physically affixed but not previously entered under that procedure still owed the excise tax, even though a new law began placing mobile homes on property-tax rolls for taxes collected in 1973.

“until this in fact occurs, the mobile home necessarily remains subject to the excise tax” (Official opinion)

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1972. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Historical summary

Mobile-home owners

The opinion said physical attachment alone did not produce the former statute’s excise-tax exemption. The home had to meet the permanent-placement conditions and actually be entered and assessed as real property under RCW 82.50.180(5). An assessor could make that entry on discovering the facts even without an owner’s request, but the exemption began only when the qualifying assessment occurred.

County assessors and tax collectors

The AG separated an entry under that existing exemption procedure from the broad 1972 transition to property taxation of mobile homes. The transition law expressly left the excise chapter applicable through December 31, 1972. Thus a newly listed home could owe a 1972 excise tax despite appearing on the rolls for property tax to be collected in 1973.

Common questions

Q: Did putting a mobile home on a permanent foundation alone end the 1972 excise tax?
A: No. The AG required prior entry and assessment under the specific exemption procedure.

Q: Could an assessor act without the owner applying?
A: The AG said yes when the assessor discovered a qualifying home and placed it on the real-property rolls under that procedure.

Q: Why did a home on the 1972 property rolls still owe the excise tax?
A: A different transition law listed mobile homes for property tax payable in 1973 while leaving the excise-tax chapter applicable through the end of 1972.

Background and statutory framework

RCW 82.50.180(5) exempted certain permanently fixed mobile homes from the excise tax after they were assessed as real property. Chapter 299, Laws of 1971, First Extraordinary Session, established a broader property-tax transition but preserved chapter 82.50 RCW through 1972. The AG read both laws together to distinguish the two homes in the request.

Citations and references

The opinion discussed RCW 82.50.180, RCW 82.50.020 and RCW 82.50.030.

Source

Original opinion text

Attorney General Slade Gorton

TAXATION ‑- REAL PROPERTY ‑- EXCISE ‑- MOBILE HOMES

(1) The owner of a mobile home which was affixed to a parcel of real property on January 1, 1972, and which had previously been placed upon the real property tax rolls of the county in which it was located pursuant to the provisions of RCW 82.50.180 (5) and assessed as such, is not liable for the excise tax on mobile homes imposed by RCW 82.50.020 for the calender year 1972.

(2) The owner of a mobile home which, although affixed to a parcel of real property as of January 1, 1972, had not previously been placed upon the real property tax rolls in accordance with RCW 82.50.180 (5) either because no application for such placement had been made by the owner or because the assessor had not discovered the mobile home and placed it upon the property tax rolls himself, is liable for the excise tax on mobile homes imposed by RCW 82.50.020 for the calendar year 1972.


July 19, 1972

Honorable Gary M. Odegaard
State Senator, 20th District
Star Route 1, Box 1A
Onalaska, Washington 98570

Cite as: AGO 1972 No. 13

Dear Sir:

By letter previously acknowledged you requested our opinion on two questions relating to the taxation of mobile homes. As clarified by subsequent discussions with you, these questions are as follows:

(1) If, on January 1, 1972, a person owned a mobile home affixed to a parcel of real property which had previously been placed upon the real property tax rolls of the county in which it was located pursuant to the provisions of RCW 82.50.180 (5) and assessed as such, would such owner be liable for the excise tax on mobile homes imposed by RCW 82.50.020 for the calendar year 1972?

[[Orig. Op. Page 2]]

(2) If, in the case described in question (1), the mobile home, although affixed to a parcel of real property as of January 1, 1972, had not previously been placed upon the real property tax rolls in accordance with RCW 82.50.180 (5) either because no application for such placement had been made by the owner or because the assessor had not discovered the mobile home and placed it upon the property tax rolls himself, would the owner of this mobile home be liable for the excise tax on mobile homes imposed by RCW 82.50.020 for the calendar year 1972?

We answer question (1) in the negative and question (2) in the affirmative for the reasons set forth in our analysis.

ANALYSIS

Chapter 82.50 RCW imposes an excise tax upon the owners of "mobile homes" as defined in RCW 82.50.010, for the privilege of using the same within this state. This tax is levied each calendar year at the current rate of 2% of the fair market value of the mobile home. See, RCW 82.50.030, as last amended by § 1, chapter 144, Laws of 1972, Ex. Sess.

However, certain mobile homes otherwise subject to this excise tax are exempt therefrom under the provisions of RCW 82.50.180. This section reads, in material part, as follows:

"The following mobile homes . . . are specifically exempted from the operation of this chapter:

". . .

"(5) A mobile home which has substantially lost its identity as a mobile unit by virtue of being permanently fixed in location upon land owned by the owner of the mobile home and placed on a permanent foundation, subsequent to the removal of the hitch, wheels and axles of said unit, and with fixed pipe connections with sewer, water or other utilities.

"Following the permanent placement of said mobile home as provided herein, and upon the request of the owner, made to the county [[Orig. Op. Page 3]] assessor, the assessor shall confirm compliance with the conditions of this subsection and if the unit so qualifies, the unit will be entered on the real property tax rolls of the involved county, and said unit shall be exempted from the provisions of this chapter from and after the date it is assessed as a part of the real property."

In AGO 1971 No. 3 [[to Department of Revenue on January 14, 1971]], copy enclosed, we concluded that:

"If a mobile home meets the conditions set forth in the first paragraph of RCW 82.50.180 (5), it is not necessary, in order for the unit to be placed on the real property tax rolls of the county in which it is located, that the owner thereof make a request to the county assessor for such entry."

In other words, a mobile home which meets the conditions set forth in the first paragraph of this subsection may be placed upon the property tax rolls of the county in which it is located either at the request of the owner or by the assessor without such a request where the assessor discovers the situation and acts upon it. However, until this in fact occurs, the mobile home necessarily remains subject to the excise tax (rather than an ad valorem real property tax) because the excise tax exemption only attaches under this statute ". . . from and after the date it [the mobile home] is assessed as a part of the real property."

Question (1):

Your first question assumes that at some time prior to January 1, 1972, this action was taken ‑ either by the owner of the subject mobile home or by the county assessor of the county in which it was located. In accordance with the foregoing, once this mobile home was placed upon the property tax rolls under RCW 82.50.180 (5), supra, and was assessed as such, it immediately ceased to be subject to the excise tax. Therefore, in this case, no 1972 excise tax is due.

Question (2):

In order to place your second question in proper focus, we [[Orig. Op. Page 4]] must now turn to certain changes in the law regarding the taxation of mobile homes which were enacted by chapter 299, Laws of 1971, 1st Ex. Sess. By this enactment the legislature provided that commencing with ad valorem property taxes levied in 1972 for collection in 1973, all mobile homes ‑ irrespective of their physical status ‑ would be subject to the property tax rather than the previous excise tax. Under this enactment those mobile homes which are permanently affixed in location upon land owned or leased by the owner will be subject to taxation as real property, and all other mobile homes will be subject to taxation as personal property. See, §§ 70-74, chapter 299, Laws of 1971, 1st Ex. Sess.

However, in recognition of the fact that property taxes levied in 1972 are not subject to collection in the normal course of events until the period between February 15 and April 30, 1973 (see, RCW 84.56.020 ‑ 84.56.050), the legislature provided in § 73, chapter 299, supra, that:

"There is added to chapter 82.50 RCW a new section to read as follows:

"The provisions of chapter 82.50 RCW shall remain applicable to mobile homes through December 31, 1972. All mobile homes subject to the property tax shall be listed and assessed for the first time on January 1, 1972 and such tax shall be paid during 1973 in accordance with the laws of this state."

The effect of this provision, of course, is to place all mobile homes on the property tax rolls of the county in which they are located as of January 1, 1972, ‑ and thus, any mobile home which was permanently affixed to a parcel of realty as of that date was then entered upon the real property tax rolls of the county. However, because it was placed upon those rolls pursuant to § 73, chapter 299, rather than by reason of either the owner or the assessor following the procedures contemplated by RCW 82.50.180 (5), supra, its placement on the rolls did not have the effect of exempting it from the 1972 mobile home excise tax. In other words, because § 73, chapter 299, calls for the continued application of the provisions of chapter 82.50 RCW to mobile homes throughout 1972, the status of this [[Orig. Op. Page 5]] mobile home, in so far as the 1972 excise tax is concerned, remains precisely as it would have been without the enactment of this 1971 legislation. As we have seen above, a mobile home which, although affixed to a parcel of realty, had not been placed upon the real property tax rolls of the county in accordance with RCW 82.50.180 (5),supra, remains subject to the excise tax rather than the property tax.

It is for this reason that although we determined your first question to be answerable in the negative (i.e., no 1972 excise tax is payable), your second question must be answered in the affirmative.

We trust that the foregoing will be of assistance to you.

Very truly yours,

SLADE GORTON
Attorney General

PHILIP H. AUSTIN
Deputy Attorney General

What does Washington law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1972. Ezel checks the current Washington statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace