Did a nonresident service member owe Washington trailer excise tax or license fees in 1965?

Short answer The AG said a qualifying house trailer was exempt from the state excise tax if not used in a trade or business. The federal relief law did not waive Washington’s trailer licensing fee when the trailer was moved on state highways; separate reciprocity could matter.
State
Washington
Opinion
AGO 65-66 No. 32
Issued
August 18, 1965
Issued by
Washington State Office of the Attorney General

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1965. Ask about yours and see what current Washington law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Washington State Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Washington attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

In 1965, the Washington Attorney General said the federal Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act protected a nonresident service member’s house trailer from the state house-trailer excise tax when it was not used in a trade or business. The AG separately concluded that the Act did not exempt the trailer from Washington’s vehicle license fee when moved on public highways. (Official opinion)

The opinion treated a house trailer as personal property for the tax question but not as a “motor vehicle” for the licensing exemption. Its footnote noted that a trailer licensed in another state might be allowed on Washington highways under separate reciprocity law.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1965. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Was the trailer subject to Washington’s house-trailer excise tax?
The AG said the federal Act exempted a qualifying nonresident service member’s trailer if it was not used in a trade or business.

Did the same federal exemption eliminate the highway license fee?
No. The opinion required licensing for moving the trailer on state highways, subject to any separate reciprocity provision.

Why were the tax and licensing answers different?
The AG classified a house trailer as personal property protected from the tax, but not as a motor vehicle within the federal license-fee exemption.

Background and statutory framework

A county prosecutor asked about federal service-member protections against RCW 82.50.020’s trailer excise tax and RCW 46.16.010’s highway licensing requirement. The AG followed an earlier opinion on both points and distinguished a later opinion dealing with motor vehicles rather than house trailers.

Citations and references

  • The opinion says the federal act exempted qualifying personnel from the house trailer excise tax “provided the house trailer is not used in a trade or business.”
  • It says nonresident servicemen moving unlicensed trailers over highways “must first secure license plates and pay the . . . fee provided therefor.”

Subject

MOTOR VEHICLES ‑- HOUSE TRAILERS ‑- EXCISE TAX ‑- VEHICLE LICENSE FEES ‑- NONRESIDENT MILITARY PERSONNEL ‑- SOLDIERS AND SAILORS CIVIL RELIEF ACT

Source

Original opinion text

Attorney General John J. O'Connell

MOTOR VEHICLES ‑- HOUSE TRAILERS ‑- EXCISE TAX ‑- VEHICLE LICENSE FEES ‑- NONRESIDENT MILITARY PERSONNEL ‑- SOLDIERS AND SAILORS CIVIL RELIEF ACT.

(1) The Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act of 1940 exempts house trailers owned by nonresident military personnel from the excise tax imposed by RCW 82.50.020.

(2) The Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act does not exempt the house trailer of nonresident military personnel from the license fee requirement of RCW 46.16.010, et seq. when the house trailer is moved over and along the public highways of this state.


August 18, 1965

Honorable Paul Klasen
Prosecuting Attorney
Grant County Court House
Ephrata, Washington

Cite as: AGO 65-66 No. 32

Dear Sir:

By letter previously acknowledged you have requested an opinion of this office relative to the application of § 574, 50 U.S.C.A. (Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act of 1940) to the imposition of certain state excise taxes and license fees against house trailers owned by nonresident military personnel. Specifically, you have asked, in effect:

(1) Does the civil relief act exempt such a nonresident's house trailer from the excise tax required by RCW 82.50.020?

(2) Does the civil relief act exempt such a nonresident's house trailer from the vehicle license fee requirement of RCW 46.16.010, et seq., when the house trailer is moved over and along a public highway of this state?

Question (1) is answered in the affirmative, and question (2) in the negative for the reasons set forth in our analysis.

ANALYSIS

Question (1):

Your first question has been previously answered by this office in AGO 57-58 No. 128 [[to Washington State Tax Commission October 29, 1957]], copy enclosed, wherein we office in AGO 57-58 No. 128, copy enclosed, wherein we [[Orig. Op. Page 2]] first noted that an excise tax on house trailers is imposed in our state by § 2, chapter 269, Laws of 1957 (cf. RCW 82.50.020). In order to determine the application of this tax to house trailers owned by nonresident military personnel we then noted the pertinent portion of the Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C.A. 574) as follows:

"(1) For the purposes of taxation in respect of any person, or of his personal property, income, or gross income, by any State, . . . such person shall not be deemed to have lost a residence or domicile in any State, Territory, possession, or political subdivision . . . solely by reason of being absent therefrom in compliance with military or naval orders, or to have acquired a residence or domicile in, or to have become resident in or a resident of, any other State, Territory, possession, . . . while, and solely by reason of being, so absent. For the purposes of taxation in respect of the personal property, income, or gross income of any such person . . . personal property shall not be deemed to be located or present in or to have a situs for taxation in such State, Territory, possession, or political subdivision . . .Provided, That nothing contained in this section shall prevent taxation by any State, Territory, possession, or political subdivision of any of the foregoing, . . . in respect of personal property used in or arising from a trade of business, . . .

"(2) When used in this section, (a) the term 'personal property' shall include tangible and intangible property (including motor vehicles), and (b) the term 'taxation' shall include but not be limited to licenses, fees, or excises imposed in respect to motor vehicles or the use thereof: Provided, That the license, fee, or excise required by the State, Territory, possession, or District of Columbia of which the person is a resident or in which he is domiciled has been paid."

We thereupon concluded:

[[Orig. Op. Page 3]]

"From the above provisions of the federal act, it is clear that Congress has granted certain tax immunity to the personal property and income of nonresident military personnel who are required by military orders to be absent from the state of their residence or domicile. The term 'personal property' above is broad enough to include house trailers.

". . .

"Accordingly, . . . it is our opinion that the provisions of the Federal Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act, supra, exempt nonresident military personnel from the state's house trailer excise tax, provided the house trailer is not used in a trade or business."

We adhere to that conclusion and accordingly, answer your first question, as paraphrased, in the affirmative.

Question (2):

Your second question, relative to the necessity (in the case of nonresident military personnel) of obtaining a vehicle license (and paying the license fee) required by RCW 46.16.010, et seq., in order to move a house trailer over and along a public highway of this state, was also considered in AGO 57-58 No. 128,supra. We noted that by virtue of subsection (2) of 50 U.S.C.A. § 574, supra, the term "taxation" (for purposes of the nonresident military personnel tax exemption granted by subsection (1))

". . . shall include . . . licenses, fees or excises imposed in respect tomotor vehicles or the use thereof: . . ." (Emphasis supplied)

However, we concluded that

". . . house trailers are not 'motor vehicles' within the terms of the Federal Soldiers and Sailors Civil Relief Act (50 U.S.C.A. App. § 574)supra, and likewise are not 'motor vehicles' within § 18, chapter 269, Laws of 1957 (RCW 82.44.010), and accordingly nonresident servicemen desiring to move unlicensed house trailers over our highways must first secure license plates and pay the . . . fee provided therefor . . ."

[[Orig. Op. Page 4]]

We likewise adhere to this conclusion.1/ AGO 63-64 No. 72, [[to C. W. "Red" Beck, State Representative]], subsequently issued on December 5, 1963, and concluding that the Soldiers and Sailors Relief Act,supra, exempts nonresident military personnel from the licensing requirements of RCW 46.16.010, et seq., supra, as well as from excise tax requirements2/ was concerned with and only applies to motor vehicles3/ and has no application to house trailers.4/

We trust the foregoing will be of assistance to you.

Very truly yours,

JOHN J. O'CONNELL
Attorney General

M. H. HEMMEN
Assistant Attorney General

*** FOOTNOTES ***

1/Notably, however, operation along Washington's highways when a trailer is licensed in another state can be lawful in any event if it falls within the provisions relating to reciprocity under RCW 46.16.030. This statutory provision, it should be noted, operates completely independent of the Federal Soldiers and Sailors Relief Act.

2/Provided they pay all motor vehicle or excise taxes and fees required by their state of residence or domicile.

3/RCW 46.04.320 defines "motor vehicle" to mean ". . . every vehicle which is self-propelled and every vehicle which is propelled by electric power obtained from overhead trolly wires, but not operated upon rails."

4/Clearly a house trailer, though not a motor vehicle, is a vehicle as defined by RCW 46.04.670, which reads:

"'Vehicle' includes every device capable of being moved upon a public highway and in, upon, or by which any persons or property is or may be transported or drawn upon a public highway, excepting devices moved by human or animal power or used exclusively upon stationary rails or tracks."

What does Washington law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1965. Ezel checks the current Washington statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace