Could Washington’s state auditor allow municipalities to use a cash overage and shortage account?

Short answer Yes, if the auditor found the proposed “long and short” account met statutory accuracy and true-account requirements. The AG found no legal bar but left the factual accounting assessment to the auditor.
State
Washington
Opinion
AGO 63-64 No. 28
Issued
May 31, 1963
Issued by
Washington State Office of the Attorney General
Requested by
Honorable Cliff Yelle, State Auditor

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1963. Ask about yours and see what current Washington law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Washington State Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Washington attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page) is the authoritative source for any reliance.

Plain-English summary

The Washington Attorney General concluded in 1963 that the state auditor could authorize a municipal “long and short” account for daily cash overages and shortages, provided the auditor found that the system satisfied RCW 43.09.200’s standards for accurate, true public accounts. The AG found no independent legal objection to that form of account but said the factual comparison of accounting methods belonged to the auditor.

The proposed method would record actual cash on hand and show an overage or shortage instead of forcing a daily balance through a petty-cash fund. The opinion understood that the method would not relieve an officer or employee of responsibility for an actual shortage. It described periodic scrutiny and an annual closing date as features of the proposal, without deciding that the system was superior as an accounting practice.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1963. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Q: Did the AG approve every “long and short” accounting system?
A: No. It said authorization depended on the state auditor finding that the particular system met statutory accuracy and true-account requirements.

Q: Could the account record actual daily shortages?
A: That was the proposed method the AG examined: the cashier would record actual cash, including any discrepancy.

Q: Did use of the account excuse a cashier’s shortage?
A: No. The opinion expressly understood that the new account would not remove responsibility for actual shortages.

Background and statutory framework

RCW 43.09.200 gave the state auditor responsibility to prescribe uniform accounting and reporting systems for public accounts and required detailed, accurate records of public funds and transactions. The AG limited its legal answer to that standard and left the factual question of whether the proposed account met it to the auditor.

Citations and references

The opinion discusses RCW 43.09.200.

Source

Original opinion text

Attorney General John J. O'Connell

OFFICES AND OFFICERS ‑- STATE ‑- AUDITOR ‑- AUTHORITY TO PRESCRIBE SYSTEM OF ACCOUNTING FOR MUNICIPAL FUNDS ‑- "LONG AND SHORT" ACCOUNT.

The state auditor has the statutory authority to authorize the use by various municipalities of a "long and short" account within the prescribed system of accounting of municipal funds, pursuant to his finding that it meets standards of accuracy required by RCW 43.09.200.


May 31, 1963

Honorable Cliff Yelle
State Auditor
Legislative Building
Olympia, Washington

Cite as: AGO 63-64 No. 28

Dear Sir:

By letter previously acknowledged you have requested the opinion of this office on a question which we paraphrase as follows:

Is it within the authority of the state auditor's office to authorize for the use of the various municipalities a "long and short" account within the prescribed system of accounting for municipal funds?

We answer your question in the affirmative as qualified in the analysis.

ANALYSIS

It is a general rule that public officers have only such powers as are expressly conferred upon them by law, or those powers which are necessarily implied from the express powers granted to them. See,State ex rel. Taylor v. Superior Court, 2 Wn.2d 575, 98 P.2d 985 (1940).

The power and duty of the state auditor to prescribe systems of accounting for municipal corporations have been established by the legislature. RCW 43.09.200 requires the state auditor, through the division of municipal corporations, to

". . . formulate, prescribe, and install a system of accounting and reporting, which shall be uniform for every public institution, and every public office, and every public account of the same class.

[[Orig. Op. Page 2]]

"The system shall exhibit true accounts and detailed statements of funds collected, received, and expended for account of the public for any purpose whatever, and by all public officers, employees, or other persons.

"The accounts shall show the receipt, use, and disposition of all public property, and the income, if any, derived therefrom; all sources of public income, and the amounts due and received from each source; all receipts, vouchers, and other documents kept, or required to be kept, necessary to isolate and prove the validity of every transaction; all statements and reports made or required to be made, for the internal administration of the office to which they pertain; and all reports published or required to be published, for the information of the people regarding any and all details of the financial administration of public affairs."

Under the present system of accounting, as you have described it, cashiers and others are required to balance the actual cash on hand with their accounts daily, on an exact basis. While the policy of the system is ideal, you point out that in practice it leads to absurdities; that because of the human error factor many municipalities employ a petty cash fund to drain off overages and fill up shortages of a minor nature. While the "long and short" account would be an official recognition of the same practice, it would eliminate the petty cash fund by eliminating the requirement of a forced balance. Under the proposed procedure the cashier or similar officer would record his accounts in accordance with the actual cash on hand at the end of each day whether or not a shortage or an overage existed. It is pointed out that in practice a shortage in one day will usually be balanced by an overage on another day so that over a period of days there is actually no overage or shortage of cash. On the other hand, the use of the petty cash fund does not reflect the accuracy or lack of it in the handling of funds.

Further, on the merits of the "long and short" account, it is pointed out that there is an annual closing date; that periodic scrutiny by management and by state examiners together with the establishment of the "long and short" account tends to be a fairly effective method of determining the efficiency of individual cashiers. It is also pointed out that both the REA [[Rural Electrification Administration]]and F.P.C. uniform system of accounts specifically provide for "cash overages and shortages" in private power accounting. Finally, it is our understanding this system would not be [[Orig. Op. Page 3]] interpreted to relieve any public employee or officer from responsibility for actual shortages, on a day-to-day basis, if such shortages are found to exist.

In view of all of these considerations, this office finds no legal objection to your office authorizing the use of a "long and short" account within the prescribed system of accounting for municipal funds. It is not for this office to decide the relative merits of one procedure over another beyond inquiring whether or not it violates any standard established by the constitution or statutes of this state. Since our analysis has discovered no such objection, it is for your office to determine whether or not this procedure meets the standards prescribed by RCW 43.09.200,supra, as a factual matter, and particularly requirements of accuracy. If your office determines that the use of the "long and short" account enhances the accuracy of the system of accounting employed by the various municipal corporations and that the system exhibits true accounts and meets the other functional requirements of the statute, we see no legal objection to its use.

We trust this information will be of assistance to you.

Very truly yours,

JOHN J. O'CONNELL
Attorney General

ROBERT F. HAUTH
Assistant Attorney General

What does Washington law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 1963. Ezel checks the current Washington statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace