Can a Virginia locality limit or refuse the property tax exemption for solar power systems?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 2024. Ask about yours and see what current Virginia law means for your facts, with citations you can check.
Plain-English summary
Virginia Attorney General Jason Miyares answered five questions about local taxation of solar property. He concluded that localities must grant the exemption in § 58.1-3660 to qualifying solar photovoltaic projects to the extent that statute provides, and must grant the exemption in § 58.1-3661(A) to qualifying small-scale facilities. A locality cannot shorten the duration of either mandatory exemption.
Generating equipment of solar photovoltaic projects with five megawatts or less in capacity is generally taxable under § 58.1-2606.1(A), despite a related exemption in § 58.1-3660. The locality sets a tax rate by ordinance, capped at its real estate rate. The statute exempts 80% of assessed value during the first five years of commercial operation, 70% during the second five years, and 60% thereafter. The taxable shares are therefore 20%, 30%, and 40%, respectively. The opinion does not describe a revenue share ordinance as an alternative that eliminates this tax. It mentions revenue share ordinances only as one possible qualifying factor under § 58.1-3660.
The tax on generating equipment is not limited to equipment owned by public service corporations. It also does not reach equipment of the small solar facilities wholly exempt under § 58.1-3661(A). The AG explained that § 58.1-2606.1(C) preserves that small-facility exemption.
What this means for you
If you assess solar property for a locality
First determine which statutory category applies. Section 58.1-3660 mandates an exemption for projects meeting its qualifying conditions, sometimes in part. Section 58.1-3661(A) wholly exempts qualifying facilities of no more than 25 direct-current kilowatts installed under § 15.2-2288.7. Neither exemption may be cut short by a locality. For generating equipment governed by § 58.1-2606.1(A), use the statutory exempt share before applying the rate set by the locality's ordinance. The rate may not exceed the local real estate rate.
If you own or develop a solar project
The opinion says the five-megawatt generating-equipment rule covers qualifying equipment regardless of whether a public service corporation owns it. The partial exemption declines with time: 80%, then 70%, then 60% of assessed value is exempt. A facility qualifying under § 58.1-3661(A) remains wholly exempt and its generating equipment is outside the § 58.1-2606.1(A) tax. The opinion does not decide whether any individual project meets those conditions.
If you draft a local tax ordinance
The AG says the locality has discretion to set the rate for § 58.1-2606.1(A) equipment, subject to the real estate rate cap, and needs an ordinance to put that tax rate into effect. The locality has no discretion to withdraw or shorten a state-mandated solar exemption or change the partial-exemption schedule. The opinion does not analyze a revenue share alternative to this generating-equipment tax.
Common questions
Q: May a locality refuse the solar exemption in § 58.1-3660?
A: No, for a project that qualifies under that statute. The AG says the exemption is mandatory to the extent specified there, whether full or partial, and a locality may not limit its duration.
Q: What percentage of a five-megawatt-or-less project's generating equipment is taxed?
A: Section 58.1-2606.1(A) exempts 80% of assessed value for the first five years of commercial operation, 70% for the next five years, and 60% thereafter. That leaves 20%, 30%, and 40% subject to the applicable rate.
Q: Does the generating-equipment tax apply only to utility-owned projects?
A: No. The opinion reads “generating equipment” to include all equipment within the provision's scope, regardless of ownership.
Q: Is a qualifying 25-kilowatt solar facility's equipment taxed under § 58.1-2606.1(A)?
A: No. The AG says the exemption in § 58.1-3661(A) covers qualifying small facilities and § 58.1-2606.1(C) preserves that exemption for their generating equipment.
Q: Did the AG say a revenue share ordinance fully exempts a five-megawatt project from generating-equipment tax?
A: No. The opinion mentions a revenue share ordinance as one factor that can affect qualification under § 58.1-3660. It does not address a revenue share alternative under § 58.1-2606.1.
Background and statutory framework
Section 58.1-3660 declares qualifying certified pollution control equipment and facilities exempt from state and local taxation, while limiting which solar photovoltaic projects qualify and whether some receive a full or partial exemption. The AG says capacity, interconnection-request date, and a locality's revenue share ordinance can affect qualification. The statute's command to exempt qualifying property is mandatory, and the AG found no authority for a locality to shorten the exemption's duration.
Section 58.1-3661(A) separately says that qualifying solar facilities of no more than 25 direct-current kilowatts, installed under § 15.2-2288.7, “shall be wholly exempt.” The AG distinguishes that direct state exemption from § 58.1-3661(B), which lets localities choose an ordinance-based exemption for other certified solar equipment.
Section 58.1-2606.1(A) makes generating equipment of projects with five megawatts or less taxable, at a locally set rate capped by the real estate rate, but exempts 80%, 70%, then 60% of assessed value across the stated periods. Its wording is not confined to public service corporations. Subsection (C) says the section does not authorize taxation of generating equipment serving property under § 15.2-2288.7, so it does not displace the small-facility exemption.
Source
- Landing page: https://www.oag.state.va.us/annual-reports-opinions/official-opinions
- Original PDF: https://www.oag.state.va.us/files/Opinions/2024/23-009-Wertz-issued.pdf
Original opinion text
Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain, the linked PDF is authoritative.
COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Office of the Attorney General
Jason S. Miyares, Attorney General
202 North Ninth Street
Richmond, Virginia 23219
804-786-2071
Fax 804-786-1991
Virginia Relay Services 800-828-1120
August 14, 2024
The Honorable Robert S. Wertz, Jr.
Commissioner of the Revenue
County of Loudoun
Post Office Box 8000
Leesburg, Virginia 20177-9804
Dear Commissioner Wertz:
I am responding to your request for an official advisory Opinion in accordance with § 2.2-505 of the Code of Virginia.
Issues Presented
You present multiple questions regarding the local taxation of property associated with solar energy initiatives. Your inquiry arises out of your duty to make assessment determinations regarding such property. Your specific questions, which implicate several different provisions of the Code, are as follows:
1) Whether it is mandatory under § 58.1-3660 for a locality to provide a property tax exemption for solar photovoltaic systems, and whether a locality may limit the duration of such an exemption;
2) Whether it is mandatory under § 58.1-3661 for a locality to provide a property tax exemption for the types of small-scale solar facilities described in subsection A of that statute, and whether a locality may limit the duration of such an exemption;
3) Whether it is mandatory under § 58.1-2606.1 for a locality to impose a tax or gradually diminishing exemption on the generating equipment of solar photovoltaic projects with 5 megawatts or less in generating capacity;
4) Whether the term "generating equipment" in § 58.1-2606.1(A) refers only to generating equipment that is owned by public service corporations; and
5) Whether the tax on generating equipment set forth in § 58.1-2606.1(A) extends to the generating equipment of the types of small-scale solar facilities that otherwise are exempt from taxation under § 58.1-3661(A).
Response
It is my opinion that:
1) A locality is required under § 58.1-3660 to provide a property tax exemption for the qualifying solar photovoltaic systems enumerated in that statute, to the extent specified in the statute, and a locality has no discretion to limit the duration of such an exemption;
2) A locality is required under § 58.1-3661 to provide a property tax exemption for the types of small-scale solar facilities described in subsection A of that statute, and a locality may not limit the duration of such an exemption;
3) A locality is required generally under § 58.1-2606.1 to impose a tax and gradually diminishing exemption on the generating equipment of solar photovoltaic projects with 5 megawatts or less in generating capacity, as described in that statute;
4) The term "generating equipment" in § 58.1-2606.1(A) refers to all generating equipment otherwise within the ambit of the provision, regardless of ownership; and
5) The tax on generating equipment set forth in § 58.1-2606.1(A) does not extend to the generating equipment of the types of small-scale solar facilities that are exempt from taxation under § 58.1-3661(A).
Applicable Law and Discussion
Your inquiry regards the taxation of property associated with solar energy. It is well settled that taxes can be levied and assessed only in accordance with law and that tax exemptions "shall be strictly construed." Your questions involve several related, yet distinct, provisions of Virginia law.
The Constitution of Virginia directs that "[a]ll property, except as hereinafter provided, shall be taxed." To implement this directive, the General Assembly is authorized to classify property into different types and to segregate it for local taxation. The Constitution then sets forth categories of property that "shall be exempt from taxation" and categories of property for which the General Assembly may provide an exemption. Pertinent to your inquiry, the Constitution provides that the General Assembly "may define as a separate subject of taxation any property, including real or personal property, equipment, facilities, or devices, used primarily for the purpose of abating or preventing pollution of the atmosphere or waters of the Commonwealth or for the purpose of transferring or storing solar energy." Upon such classification, the General Assembly is further authorized to "allow the governing body of any [locality] to exempt or partially exempt such property from taxation, or . . . directly exempt or partially exempt such property from taxation" by general law.
Pursuant to this authority, the General Assembly has enacted several statutes providing for the taxation, and exemption therefrom, of property affiliated with solar energy. Your request specifically seeks clarification on the application of Code §§ 58.1-3660, 58.1-3661, and 58.1-2606.1.
Familiar rules of statutory construction govern your inquiry. In construing the applicable statutes, the "primary objective" is "to ascertain and give effect to legislative intent[,]" which "must be gathered from the words used in the statute." Courts "assume that the General Assembly chose, with care, the words it used in enacting [a] statute[,]" and when the language of a statute is plain and unambiguous, the words will be given their clear effect. In addition, statutes addressing the same subject "should be read, construed and applied together so that the legislature's intention can be gathered from the whole of the enactments."
Local Discretion under § 58.1-3660
You ask whether § 58.1-3660 requires a locality to provide a property tax exemption for solar photovoltaic systems. Section 58.1-3660 declares "[c]ertified pollution control equipment and facilities" to be "a separate class of property" and expressly directs that such property "shall be exempt from state and local taxation[.]" Nevertheless, the statute further provides that, "[f]or solar photovoltaic (electric energy) systems, the exemption applies only to" certain enumerated qualifying projects. For some of these qualifying projects, the exemption is only partial, limited to a percentage of assessed value that decreases incrementally over time. Whether a project qualifies for exemption under the statute (in full or partially) depends on factors such as the project's generating capacity, the date on which an initial interconnection request form was filed, and/or whether the locality has adopted a revenue share ordinance.
Although the exemption for solar photovoltaic systems in § 58.1-3660 applies only to certain qualifying projects, and further is limited for some of these projects, the General Assembly clearly has provided that the exemption "shall" apply to the property it encompasses. The word "shall" in a statute typically is construed as mandatory absent any manifestation of contrary intent by the legislature. There is no indication in the language of § 58.1-3660 that the word "shall" is intended to be other than mandatory. Therefore, in my opinion a locality is required under § 58.1-3660 to recognize the exemption for qualifying solar photovoltaic projects, to the extent specified in the statute.
You also ask whether a locality may limit the duration of the exemption afforded qualifying solar photovoltaic projects under § 58.1-3660. There is no language in the statute that explicitly or implicitly permits a locality to limit the duration of the exemption for such projects. In interpreting statutes, it is not permissible to "add to the words of the statute" or interpret a statute "to mean what it does not state." Accordingly, in the absence of any language in § 58.1-3660 permitting a locality to limit the duration of the exemption for qualifying solar photovoltaic projects, it is my opinion that a locality is not permitted to do so. This conclusion applies regardless of whether the exemption applies in full to the project, or whether the exemption is limited in percentage.
Local Discretion under § 58.1-3661
You also inquire regarding the scope of a locality's discretion under § 58.1-3661 to extend a tax exemption to the types of small-scale solar facilities described in subsection A of that statute. You ask whether such an exemption is mandatory and whether a locality may limit its duration.
Section 58.1-3661(B) provides that "[c]ertified solar energy equipment, facilities, or devices . . . are hereby declared to be a separate class of property and shall constitute a classification for local taxation separate from other classifications of real or personal property" and authorizes localities, "by ordinance, [to] exempt or partially exempt such property" in accordance with law. The statute then directs, among other things, that, "if such ordinance is in effect," the "exemption shall be effective beginning in the next succeeding tax year and shall be permitted for a term of not less than five years."
With respect to "[a]ny solar facility installed pursuant to subsections A or B of § 15.2-2288.7 with a nameplate rated electrical generating capacity measured in direct current kilowatts of not more than 25 kilowatts[,]" however, § 58.1-3661(A) more specifically establishes such a facility as a distinct tax classification and directs that "[s]uch facilities shall be wholly exempt from state and local taxation . . . ." Because the General Assembly has mandated directly that this type of solar facility "shall be" tax exempt, a locality is without power to disregard the exemption. Accordingly, the plain language of § 58.1-3661 makes clear that, while a locality generally has discretion to adopt an ordinance exempting certified solar energy facilities from taxation (subject to the statute's term prescriptions), a locality does not have any discretion with respect to exempting the facilities specifically identified in § 58.1-3661(A).
In addition, as with the exemptions established in § 58.1-3660, the exemption created by the General Assembly under § 58.1-3661(A) is indefinite. Section 58.1-3661 contains no language authorizing a locality to limit the duration of the exemption for the facilities identified in § 58.1-3661(A). In the absence of any such language, a locality has no discretion to limit how long the exemption for these facilities remains in effect.
Application of § 58.1-2606.1
Your next several questions relate to § 58.1-2606.1(A). The provision states that
[n]otwithstanding clause (iv) of subsection (C) of § 58.1-3660, generating equipment of solar photovoltaic projects five megawatts or less shall be taxable by a locality, at a rate determined by such locality, but shall not exceed the real estate rate applicable in that locality . . .
The provision then further establishes that
notwithstanding subsection F of § 58.1-3660, the exemption shall be as follows: 80 percent of the assessed value in the first five years after commencement of commercial operation, 70 percent of the assessed value in the second five years of service, and 60 percent of the assessed value for all remaining years in service.
Your first question with respect to this statute relates to the degree of discretion it affords local governments. You ask whether the statute renders the imposition of either a tax or gradually diminishing exemption mandatory.
The text of § 58.1-2606.1(A) makes clear that it is to be read in the context of § 58.1-3660. As discussed above, § 58.1-3660 generally exempts, in full, certified pollution control equipment and facilities from local taxation, but it also excludes from the exemption solar photovoltaic systems unless a project falls within one of five subclassifications. Nevertheless, § 58.1-3660(F) provides a partial exemption that is limited to projects that fall within either of two of those subclassifications; for qualifying projects, the partial exemption is reduced over time.
Section 58.1-2606.1(A) provides that "notwithstanding" an otherwise applicable provision of § 58.1-3660, the subject generating equipment "shall be taxable." The relevant clause of § 58.1-3660, clause (iv) of subsection (C), includes among the tax-exempt solar photovoltaic systems those "projects equaling five megawatts or less, as measured in alternating current (AC) generation capacity, for which an initial interconnection request form has been filed with an electric utility or a regional transmission organization on or after January 1, 2019[.]" Although the General Assembly thus has provided a tax exemption for such projects generally, pursuant to § 58.1-2606.1(A), "notwithstanding" this exemption, the generating equipment associated with the project "shall be taxable."
Consequently, absent another applicable exemption, such property must be taxed. The rate of taxation remains a matter of discretion for the local governing body, provided the rate does "not exceed the real estate rate applicable in that locality." Unlike exemptions mandated by the Constitution or an act of the General Assembly, the levying of local taxes and setting of tax rates are legislative functions that may be exercised only by the governing body of the local taxing jurisdiction; consequently, a duly adopted ordinance setting forth the applicable tax rate is required to put the tax into effect.
Although generating equipment governed by § 58.1-2606.1(A) remains taxable, its full value is not subjected to the applicable tax rate. Rather, in enacting the remainder of § 58.1-2606.1(A), the General Assembly extended the partial exemption afforded only two other projects under § 58.1-3660(F) to "generating equipment of solar photovoltaic projects five megawatts or less." Because the General Assembly opted to directly provide this limited exemption by general law rather than authorizing local governments to provide for any such exemption, I conclude that, other than setting an appropriate tax rate, localities have no discretion to tax or exempt this classification of property in any other manner.
You next ask whether "generating equipment," as used in § 58.1-2606.1(A), is limited to generating equipment owned by public service corporations. Your question arises from the statute's codification within Chapter 26 of Title 58.1, which is entitled "Taxation of Public Service Corporations."
It is well established that "[a] provision's placement in a particular [portion of the Code] does not substitute for a statute's operative text." As Virginia courts have observed, "a statute's placement in a particular part of the Code may generally not be considered when the language of the statute is clear and unambiguous." Accordingly, the title of the chapter in which a statute is codified does not override the statute's plain meaning.
Here, the language of § 58.1-2606.1(A) is clear and unambiguous. Nothing in this language limits the scope of the term "generating equipment" to generating equipment owned by public service corporations. Had the General Assembly intended to limit the scope of the term, it knew how to do so, as evidenced by the language of surrounding statutes that refer to "the property of public service corporations" assessed under the chapter. Moreover, on a broader level, the chapter deals not only with the taxation of the property of "public service corporations," but also the taxation of property of "other persons" assessed under the chapter, which necessarily encompasses persons owning generating equipment subject to the tax who are not public service corporations. Therefore, in the absence of any qualifying language in § 58.1-2606.1, it is my opinion that the term "generating equipment" in § 58.1-2606.1(A) is not limited to generating equipment owned by public service corporations, but instead refers to all "generating equipment" otherwise described in the provision, regardless of ownership.
Lastly, you ask whether the property that is taxable under § 58.1-2606.1(A) includes generating equipment of small-scale solar facilities, i.e., those with a generating capacity of not more than 25 kilowatts, that otherwise are exempt from taxation under § 58.1-3661(A).
As noted above, § 58.1-3661(A) provides that solar facilities with a nameplate rated electrical generating capacity of 25 kilowatts or less, as measured in direct current kilowatts, are "wholly exempt" from local taxation when they are "installed pursuant to subsections A or B of § 15.2-2288.7." Subsections A and B of § 15.2-2288.7, in turn, relate generally to certain solar facilities installed on the roofs of residential dwellings to serve the energy needs of residential or agricultural properties on which they are located.
Therefore, under § 58.1-3661(A), if a solar facility (1) has a nameplate rated electrical generating capacity measured in direct current kilowatts of not more than 25 kilowatts, and (2) is installed to serve the energy needs of a property in accordance with the conditions of § 15.2-2288.7(A) or (B), it is exempt from state and location taxation. It follows that the generating equipment of such facilities also is made exempt under this provision.
There is nothing in § 58.1-2606.1 that disturbs this exemption. To the contrary, § 58.1-2606.1(C) specifically provides that "nothing herein shall be construed to authorize local taxation pursuant to this section . . . of generating . . . equipment of solar photovoltaic projects that serve the electricity needs of that property upon which such solar facilities are located, as is provided in § 15.2-2288.7." Accordingly, generating equipment used in small-scale solar photovoltaic facilities made exempt pursuant to § 58.1-3661(A) is not subject to taxation under § 58.1-2606.1(A).
Conclusion
Accordingly, it is my opinion that:
1) A locality is required under § 58.1-3660 to provide a property tax exemption for the qualifying solar photovoltaic systems enumerated in that statute, to the extent specified in the statute, and a locality has no discretion to limit the duration of such an exemption;
2) A locality is required under § 58.1-3661 to provide a property tax exemption for the types of small-scale solar facilities described in subsection A of that statute, and a locality may not limit the duration of such an exemption;
3) A locality is required generally under § 58.1-2606.1 to impose a tax and gradually diminishing exemption on the generating equipment of solar photovoltaic projects with 5 megawatts or less in generating capacity, as described in that statute;
4) The term "generating equipment" in § 58.1-2606.1(A) refers to all generating equipment otherwise within the ambit of the provision, regardless of ownership; and
5) The tax on generating equipment set forth in § 58.1-2606.1(A) does not extend to the generating equipment of the types of small-scale solar facilities that are exempt from taxation under § 58.1-3661(A).
With kindest regards, I am,
Very truly yours,
Jason S. Miyares
Attorney General
What does Virginia law say today, for your facts?
This opinion is from 2024. Ezel checks the current Virginia statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.
Opens in Ezel Pro.
- Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
- Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
- Chat, drafting and research in one workspace