If an elderly Virginia homeowner rolls a retirement distribution into another retirement account, does that money count as income for their property tax relief?

Short answer No. If money is distributed from one retirement account and rolled into another retirement account, or into an investment account the taxpayer treats as a retirement account, the rollover is not counted as income for purposes of Virginia's property tax relief program for elderly and disabled persons under § 58.1-3211.
State
Virginia
Opinion
08-066
Issued
December 1, 2008
Issued by
Office of the Virginia Attorney General
Requested by
The Honorable Robert S. Wertz, Jr., Loudoun County Commissioner of the Revenue

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 2008. Ask about yours and see what current Virginia law means for your facts, with citations you can check.

Disclaimer: This is an official Virginia Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority but not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. Consult a licensed Virginia attorney for advice on your specific situation.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Plain-English summary

The Loudoun County Commissioner of the Revenue asked whether money distributed from a retirement account counts as income for the elderly and disabled property tax relief calculation when it is deposited into another retirement account or into an investment account the taxpayer characterizes as a retirement account.

The AG answered no for both forms of deposit. Section 58.1-3211 measures "total gross income from all sources," but prior Virginia AG opinions read income for this program as money received on a regular basis and available to meet expenses. The opinion concluded that a retirement-account transfer into another retirement account, or into an investment account characterized by the taxpayer as a retirement account, is not readily available to meet expenses and therefore is not income for this calculation. It did not assign the Commissioner a separate case-by-case inquiry into whether the taxpayer's characterization was sincere or require particular documents.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 2008. Check the current Virginia statute and tax-relief rules before relying on its treatment of a transfer.

What the opinion meant for those involved

Homeowners seeking elderly or disability tax relief

The opinion treats a distribution deposited into another retirement account, or into an investment account you characterize as a retirement account, as outside the total combined income calculation under section 58.1-3211. The AG contrasted these transfers with the 2006 opinion addressing retirement distributions generally. The opinion does not set out a documentation requirement for the investment account example.

Commissioners of the Revenue

For the two transfers the request described, the AG's conclusion was that the distribution is not income. Its stated reason was that money placed into a retirement account or an investment account to be used as one is not readily available to meet expenses. The opinion did not prescribe additional fact-finding steps, a pattern-of-use test, or an evidence checklist.

Common questions

Q: Does moving a retirement distribution into another retirement account count as income for this tax relief calculation?
A: No. The AG concluded a distribution deposited into another retirement account is not income under section 58.1-3211.

Q: What if the distribution goes into an investment account the taxpayer calls a retirement account?
A: The AG gave the same answer for an investment account the taxpayer characterizes as a retirement account: the deposited distribution is not income for this calculation. The opinion does not add a documentation or pattern-of-use test.

Q: Why did the AG discuss the federal 60-day rollover rule?
A: The opinion described federal tax treatment as background to retirement transfers. Its Virginia tax-relief conclusion covered the two deposits described in the request and did not state a separate 60-day requirement for the investment-account example.

Q: Did the AG reverse its earlier view that retirement distributions can be income?
A: No. The Commissioner cited a 2006 opinion treating lump-sum and periodic distributions as income. The AG noted that the earlier opinion had not addressed transfers from one retirement plan to another or to an account intended as a retirement fund.

Background and statutory framework

Virginia Code section 58.1-3210 authorizes local tax relief for qualifying elderly and disabled property owners. Section 58.1-3211 defines the relevant income as "total gross income from all sources" with specified exclusions. The AG cited prior opinions asking whether money is available to meet expenses and observing that the statute does not simply adopt federal income-tax principles. It also described the federal treatment of certain tax-free rollovers, including the 60-day window, before concluding that the two forms of transfer in the request are not income under Virginia's property tax relief statute.

Citations and references

Statutes:

Prior AG opinions referenced:

  • 1992 Op. Va. Att'y Gen. 175 ("available to meet expenses" rule)
  • 1987-1988 Op. Va. Att'y Gen. 527 ("income" given ordinary meaning)
  • 1985-1986 Op. Va. Att'y Gen. 304
  • 1981-1982 Op. Va. Att'y Gen. 354
  • 1976-1977 Op. Va. Att'y Gen. 294
  • 1973-1974 Op. Va. Att'y Gen. 401 (interpreting predecessor § 58-760.1)
  • 2006 Op. Va. Att'y Gen. 199 (distributions as income)

Source

Original opinion text

COMMONWEALTH of VIRGINIA
Office of the Attorney General
Robert F. McDonnell, Attorney General

December 1, 2008

The Honorable Robert S. Wertz, Jr.
Loudoun County Commissioner of the Revenue

Dear Mr. Wertz:

I am responding to your request for an official advisory opinion in accordance with § 2.2-505 of the Code of Virginia.

Issue Presented

You ask whether a distribution from a retirement account that is deposited into another retirement account, or into another investment account that the taxpayer characterizes as a retirement account, would be income for purposes of calculating total combined income for the tax relief program for elderly and disabled persons under § 58.1-3211.

Response

It is my opinion that a distribution from a retirement account deposited into another retirement account, or into another investment account that the taxpayer characterizes as a retirement account, is not income for purposes of calculating total combined income for the tax relief program for elderly and disabled persons under § 58.1-3211.

Background

You seek guidance concerning the treatment of retirement account distributions, commonly referred to as rollovers, for purposes of determining eligibility for the exemption or deferral of taxes on property of certain elderly and handicapped persons under § 58.1-3211.

You advise that there are substantial differences of opinion regarding what distributions from retirement accounts, if any, should be excluded from total combined income for purposes of elderly or disabled persons qualifying for tax relief. You relate that elderly or disabled property owners occasionally transfer monies between retirement accounts or other investment accounts, often referred to as a "rollover" for federal income tax purposes. You also advise that some Virginia localities disregard a rollover when determining total combined income. The reasoning is that such rollovers generally are placed into another retirement account within sixty days, thus satisfying the Internal Revenue Service requirement and avoiding payment of penalties and taxes on the distribution.

Finally, you advise that you are aware of a 2006 opinion regarding income from IRAs, 401Ks, and similar retirement plans.[1] You observe that the opinion concludes that distributions from retirement plans, including lump sum and periodic distributions, should be considered income.[2] However, you note that the opinion does not mention distributions from one retirement plan deposited into another plan or monies distributed from a retirement fund into another form of account with the intent to use such account as a retirement fund.

Applicable Law and Discussion

Section 58.1-3211(1)(a) requires that "the total combined income received from all sources during the preceding calendar year" be used to determine income. Further, § 58.1-3211(5) provides that "income shall mean total gross income from all sources, without regard to whether a tax return is actually filed. Income shall not include life insurance benefits or receipts from borrowing or other debt."

A prior opinion of the Attorney General (the "1992 Opinion") notes that "the exemption authorized by § 58.1-3210 is to provide relief to elderly or disabled individuals who bear a tax burden on their real estate that is extraordinary in relation to their income.[3]" The 1992 Opinion concludes that in deciding whether income is part of the "total combined income" contemplated by § 58.1-3211, "the focus of the inquiry is whether the income is available to meet expenses."[4] Another opinion of the Attorney General notes that the term "income" generally has no accepted meaning in income tax law and concludes that the General Assembly did not intend to refer to income tax principles when using the term "income" in § 58.1-3211.[5] Income is "the amount of money received on a regular basis and thus available to meet expenses."[6]

Generally, under the Internal Revenue Code, "any amount paid or distributed out of an individual retirement plan shall be included in gross income by the payee or distribute, as the case may be, in the manner provided under section 72."[7] However, § 72 permits certain tax-free rollovers.[8] Any amount paid or distributed to an individual for whose benefit the account or annuity was established is not taxed if the entire amount received is paid into an individual retirement account or annuity, other than an endowment contract, not later than the sixtieth day after the day on which he receives the payment or distribution.[9] However, this rule does not apply to any amount received by an individual "if at any time during the [one] year period ending on the day of such receipt such individual received any other amount … from an individual retirement account or an individual retirement annuity," which was permitted to be received tax-free under such rule or any other rules permitting tax-free rollovers.[10]

Tax-free rollovers do not constitute income because such rollovers do not represent an amount of money received on a regular basis that is available to meet expenses. Therefore, distributions from one retirement account deposited into another retirement account or an investment account to be used as a retirement account, which are not readily available to meet expenses, cannot be counted as income for purposes of total income under § 58.1-3211.

Conclusion

Accordingly, it is my opinion that a distribution from a retirement account deposited into another retirement account, or into another investment account that the taxpayer characterizes as a retirement account, is not income for purposes of calculating total combined income for the tax relief program for elderly and disabled persons under § 58.1-3211.

Thank you for letting me be of service to you.

Sincerely,

Robert F. McDonnell
Attorney General


  1. 2006 Op. Va. Att'y Gen. 199.
  2. Id.
  3. 1992 Op. Va. Att'y Gen. 175, 176.
  4. Id. at 177. Prior Opinions of this Office interpreting § 58.1-3211 consistently have applied this rule. See Op. Va. Att'y Gen.: 1987-1988 at 527, 528; 1985-1986 at 304, 304; see also 1981-1982 at 354, 356; 1976-1977 at 294, 294-95; 1973-1974 at 401, 401 (interpreting § 58-760.1, predecessor to § 58.1-3211, and noting that income is compensation paid on regular basis and intended for daily expenses).
  5. 1987-1988 Op. Va. Att'y Gen., supra note 4, at 528 (concluding that term "income" must be given its ordinary meaning in context of statute).
  6. 1985-1986 Op. Va. Att'y Gen., supra note 4, at 304; see also 1976-1977 Op. Va. Att'y Gen., supra note 4, at 295 (defining "income" as "amount of money coming in on regular basis and thus available to meet expenses").
  7. 26 U.S.C.A. § 408(d)(1) (West Supp. 2008).
  8. Id. § 408(d)(3)(A) (West Supp. 2008).
  9. Id. § 408(d)(3)(A)(i) (West Supp. 2008).
  10. Id. § 408(d)(3)(B) (West Supp. 2008).

What does Virginia law say today, for your facts?

This opinion is from 2008. Ezel checks the current Virginia statutes and case law, applies them to your situation, and cites what it relies on.

Opens in Ezel Pro.

  • Checks the law as it stands today, not only this page
  • Cites every source it relies on, so you can verify it
  • Chat, drafting and research in one workspace