When two Texas laws passed the same year set different penalties for the same offense, which one applies?

Texas AG Opinion JM-914: Which Bill Wins When Two Wildlife Penalty Laws Collide

Plain-English summary

In 1985 the Texas Legislature managed to pass two different bills that each rewrote the same penalty sections of the Parks and Wildlife Code. One bill, S.B. 464, was a big Sunset-review overhaul of the whole department. It swept out the old penalties scattered through the code and set up a clean new schedule of Class A, B, and C misdemeanors, making most chapter 47 fishing offenses Class C. The other bill, S.B. 980, was a narrow measure about buying, selling, and transporting fish, aimed at protecting the commercial redfish and speckled sea trout harvest, and it wrote its own fines for a specific list of sections. The two set different dollar amounts and different consequences for the same conduct. The department's director asked the Attorney General which one to follow.

The answer starts with a basic rule: laws about the same subject are read together and harmonized wherever possible, so that each can do its job without stepping on the other. But sometimes two laws simply cannot be squared, and here the fines and jail terms flatly disagreed for the sections S.B. 980 listed. When two acts from the same legislative session truly conflict, the tiebreaker is which one passed last, because the later vote is the legislature's most recent word on the subject. S.B. 980 was the last of the two to clear the legislature (the Senate signed off on the final version on May 27, 1985, six days after it finished with S.B. 464), so S.B. 980 wins wherever the two collide.

That does not throw out S.B. 464. The conflict only reaches the specific sections S.B. 980 addressed, so S.B. 980 governs those and S.B. 464's new penalty schedule governs everything else in chapter 47. In practice: the sections S.B. 980 listed carry a $10 to $100 fine plus a one-year forfeiture of any license tied to those sections, except that three of them (47.003(a), 47.007, and 47.012) carry a stiffer $100 to $1,000 fine, up to a year in jail, or both. Every other chapter 47 violation is a Class C misdemeanor under S.B. 464, punishable by a $25 to $500 fine. And because S.B. 980 said nothing about repeat offenders, S.B. 464's enhancement still applies: someone with a prior conviction within five years under sections 47.008, 47.016, or 47.038 who is convicted again under the same section is bumped up to a Class B misdemeanor.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1988. Later statutes, court decisions, and AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule mentioned here.

The Parks and Wildlife Code penalty scheme has been amended many times since 1985, and the specific dollar amounts, section numbers, and offense classifications discussed here have almost certainly shifted. Anyone dealing with a current fishing or marine-products penalty question should look at the present text of chapter 47 and the code's penalty subchapter rather than the 1985 bill versions. What remains useful is the interpretive rule at the heart of the opinion: when the same legislature passes two conflicting statutes, courts and agencies harmonize them if they can, and where they cannot, the bill enacted last controls.

Who this opinion affected (as of 1988)

The Parks and Wildlife Department: The opinion told game wardens and prosecutors exactly which penalty to charge for each chapter 47 section, resolving day-to-day confusion at the point of enforcement.

Commercial and recreational fishers: People cited under chapter 47 needed to know whether they faced a small fine under S.B. 980, a Class C fine under S.B. 464, or the stiffer jail-eligible penalties for a few specific sections.

Courts: The opinion gave judges a clear rule for sentencing under two statutes that plainly disagreed.

Common questions

Why didn't the two bills just cancel each other out?
Because conflicting statutes from the same session are not a stalemate. The law treats the one passed last as the legislature's final word, so it controls the overlap while the other keeps its remaining effect.

Did S.B. 980 repeal S.B. 464?
Only to the extent of the actual conflict. S.B. 980 governs the specific sections it listed; S.B. 464's new penalty schedule still governs every other section of chapter 47.

What does "in pari materia" mean?
It is the rule that statutes on the same subject are read together as if they were one law, and harmonized where possible. Only when they cannot be harmonized does the later-enacted-wins tiebreaker kick in.

Which fish offenses got the tougher penalty?
Violations of sections 47.003(a), 47.007, and 47.012 carried a $100 to $1,000 fine, up to a year in jail, or both. Most of the other listed sections carried just a $10 to $100 fine plus a one-year license forfeiture.

Background and statutory framework

Before the 1985 amendments, section 47.051 of the Parks and Wildlife Code made violation of a list of chapter 47 sections a misdemeanor punishable by a $10 to $200 fine and possible one-year license forfeiture, and section 47.052 made violation of other listed sections a misdemeanor punishable by a $100 to $1,000 fine, one month to one year in jail, or both. In 1985 the department was reviewed under the Sunset Law (now Gov't Code ch. 325), and the 69th Legislature enacted S.B. 464 (Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 267, at 1251), a comprehensive overhaul whose Article 3 added subchapter E to chapter 12, establishing a new penalty schedule. Section 12.403 classified Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanors into three classes (and made Penal Code section 12.41 inapplicable to code offenses); sections 12.404, 12.405, and 12.406 set the punishments for Class A ($500 to $2,000 fine, up to one year in jail, or both), Class B ($200 to $1,000 fine, up to 180 days in jail, or both), and Class C (a $25 to $200 fine). S.B. 464's version of section 47.051 made a chapter 47 violation a Class C misdemeanor except as provided by section 47.052, and its section 47.052 made violations of sections 47.003(a) and 47.007 Class B misdemeanors, added seizure and injunction provisions, and added a prior-conviction enhancement (subsection (d)) for sections 47.008, 47.016, and 47.038.

S.B. 980 (Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 827, at 2885) was narrower, titled as an act relating to the transportation of and commerce in fish and other edible marine products and to records of convictions. Its bill analysis described a purpose of strengthening protection of the commercial harvest of redfish and speckled sea trout through record-keeping requirements. Its version of section 47.051 made violations of a specified list of sections a misdemeanor punishable by a $10 to $200 fine plus a one-year license forfeiture, and its version of section 47.052(a) made violations of sections 47.003(a), 47.007, or 47.012 punishable by a $100 to $1,000 fine, one month to one year in jail, or both.

The Attorney General applied the in pari materia doctrine: statutes dealing with the same general subject are construed together, and any conflict is harmonized if possible so effect is given to all provisions of each act (State v. Dyer, 200 S.W.2d 813 (Tex. 1947); Wintermann v. McDonald, 102 S.W.2d 167 (Tex. 1937); Trimmier v. Carlton, 296 S.W. 1070 (Tex. 1927); Conley v. Daughters of the Republic of Texas, 156 S.W. 197 (Tex. 1913)). But where conflicting statutes are enacted by the same session, the latest expression of legislative intent prevails (Ex parte de Jesus de la O, 227 S.W.2d 212 (Tex. Crim. App. 1950); Attorney General Opinions MW-139 (1980), H-1115 (1978)), and the statute last passed prevails over an earlier one of the same session regardless of effective date (1A Sutherland Statutory Construction § 23.17 (4th ed.)). Both bills passed the 69th Legislature and both dealt with punishments for code violations. The Senate concurred in the House amendments to S.B. 464 on May 21, 1985, and in the House amendments to S.B. 980 on May 27, 1985, so S.B. 980 was the last enacted and represents the most recent expression of legislative intent.

Because the punishments differ under each bill, the two are irreconcilably in conflict as to the sections set out in the later-enacted S.B. 980. Punishments for sections 47.002, 47.003(a), 47.004 through 47.006, 47.008, 47.009 through 47.011, 47.012, 47.013 through 47.015, 47.017, 47.032 through 47.034, and 47.037 must be assessed under S.B. 980: a $10 to $100 fine plus one-year license forfeiture for all of them except sections 47.003(a), 47.007, and 47.012, which carry a $100 to $1,000 fine, one month to one year in jail, or both. Punishments for the remaining chapter 47 sections are assessed under S.B. 464 as Class C misdemeanors ($25 to $500 fine). Because S.B. 980 is silent as to enhancement, S.B. 464's enhancement controls: a prior conviction within five years under section 47.008, 47.016, or 47.038, followed by conviction under the same section, is enhanced to a Class B misdemeanor.

Citations

Statutory authority:

• Parks and Wildlife Code sections 47.051, 47.052 (penalty provisions); the listed chapter 47 offense sections (47.002-47.017, 47.032-47.038)
• Parks and Wildlife Code sections 12.403, 12.404, 12.405, 12.406 (Class A/B/C misdemeanor schedule, added by S.B. 464 subchapter E)
• Penal Code section 12.41 (made inapplicable to code offenses by section 12.403)
• Gov't Code chapter 325 (Sunset Law)
• Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 267, at 1251 (S.B. 464), Article 3; ch. 827, at 2885 (S.B. 980)

Cases:

• State v. Dyer, 200 S.W.2d 813 (Tex. 1947) (Texas Supreme Court; in pari materia construction)
• Wintermann v. McDonald, 102 S.W.2d 167 (Tex. 1937); Trimmier v. Carlton, 296 S.W. 1070 (Tex. 1927); Conley v. Daughters of the Republic of Texas, 156 S.W. 197 (Tex. 1913) (Texas Supreme Court; harmonizing statutes on the same subject)
• Ex parte de Jesus de la O, 227 S.W.2d 212 (Tex. Crim. App. 1950) (Texas Court of Criminal Appeals; latest expression of legislative intent prevails)

Secondary authority: 1A Sutherland Statutory Construction section 23.17 (4th ed.).

Prior Attorney General materials referenced: MW-139 (1980); H-1115 (1978).

Source

• Landing page: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinions/jim-mattox/jm-914
• Original PDF: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1988/jm0914.pdf

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF (pdftotext -layout). Minor OCR errors remain (for example, "S.W.Zd" for "S.W.2d", stray marks, and garbled case names in the string citation, corrected here against the reporters: Wintermann v. McDonald, Trimmier v. Carlton); the linked PDF is authoritative.

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS

June 3, 1988

Mr. Charles D. Travis
Executive Director
Parks and Wildlife Department
4200 Smith School Road
Austin, Texas 78744

Opinion No. JM-914

Re: Conflict between provisions of the Parks and Wildlife Code (RQ-1351)

Dear Mr. Travis:

The 69th Legislature enacted Senate Bill No. 464 (Acts 1985, 69th Legislature, chapter 267, at 1251), and Senate Bill No. 980 (Acts 1985, 69th Legislature, chapter 827, at 2885), both of which contain amended versions of sections 47.051 and 47.052 of the Parks and Wildlife Code. You ask whether the two amended versions are in conflict and, if they are, which amended version prevails. We conclude, first, that the amended sections are in irreconcilable conflict, but only as to the specific sections set out in S.B. 980, and, second, that S.B. 980 controls in the event of any such conflict. We first will discuss the provisions of S.B. 464; then we will turn to S.B. 980.

Prior to the 1985 amendments, section 47.051 made violation of a certain list of sections in chapter 47 a misdemeanor, punishable by a fine of not less than $10 nor more than $200 and the possible forfeiture for one year of any license held under the authority of the listed sections. Prior to the 1985 amendments, section 47.052 made violation of certain other listed sections a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000, by confinement in jail for not less than one month nor more than one year, or by both.

In 1985 the Parks and Wildlife Department was reviewed pursuant to what is now chapter 325 of the Government Code, the so-called "Sunset Law," and, as a consequence, the 69th Legislature enacted S.B. 464, which sets forth comprehensive amendments to the Parks and Wildlife Code. Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 267, at 1251 et seq. Article 3 of S.B. 464 amends chapter 12 of the code by adding subchapter E, which established a new penalty schedule for Parks and Wildlife Code violations in lieu of the specific penalties which had formerly been listed throughout the code.

Article 3 of S.B. 464 amends section 47.051 of the code to provide the following: "Except as provided by Section 47.052 of this code, a person who violates a provision of this chapter commits an offense that is a Class C Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor." Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 267, art. 3, § 33 at 1280. It amends section 47.052 of the code by adding provisions for penalty enhancement in subsection (d):

(a) A person who fails to comply with or who violates a provision of Section 47.003(a) or 47.007 of this code commits an offense that is a Class B Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor.

(b) The department may seize boats, nets, seines, trawls, or other tackle in the possession of a person violating the sections listed in Subsection (a) of this section and hold them until after the trial of the person.

(c) Violations of the above sections may also be enjoined by the attorney general by suit filed in a district court in Travis County.

(d) If it is shown at the trial of the defendant for a violation of Section 47.008, 47.016, or 47.038 of this code that he has been convicted within five years before the trial date of a violation of the section for which he is being prosecuted, on conviction he shall be punished for a Class B Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor.

§ 34 at 1281.

S.B. 464 also enacted section 12.403, which sets forth the classification of Parks and Wildlife Code offenses and provides that Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanors shall be in three classes, according to the seriousness of the offense.[1] Sections 12.404, 12.405 and 12.406 of the code, also enacted by S.B. 464, set forth the punishments appropriate to Class A, Class B, and Class C misdemeanors respectively. Section 12.404 provides for punishment of a "Class A Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor":

An individual adjudged guilty of a Class A Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor shall be punished by: (1) a fine of not less than $500 nor more than $2,000; (2) confinement in jail for a term not to exceed one year; or (3) both such fine and imprisonment.

Section 12.405 of the code sets forth the punishment of a "Class B Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor":

An individual adjudged guilty of a Class B Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor shall be punished by: (1) a fine of not less than $200 nor more than $1,000; (2) confinement in jail for a term not to exceed 180 days; or (3) both such fine and imprisonment.

Section 12.406 of the code sets forth the punishment of a "Class C Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor":

An individual adjudged guilty of a Class C Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor shall be punished by a fine of not less than $25 nor more than $200.

S.B. 980, on the other hand, also contains, inter alia, amended versions of sections 47.051 and 47.052 of the code. The S.B. 980 version of section 47.051 provides:

A person who violates a provision of Section 47.002, 47.004 through 47.006, 47.009 through 47.011, 47.013 through 47.015, 47.017, 47.032 through 47.034, or 47.037, of this code is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is punishable by a fine of not less than $10 nor more than $200 and is subject to the forfeiture, for one year from the date of the conviction, of a license held under the authority of the listed sections.

Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 827, § 4 at 2886.

The S.B. 980 version of subsection (a) of section 47.052 of the code provides:

(a) A person who fails to comply with or who violates a provision of Section 47.003(a), 47.007, or 47.012 of this code is guilty of a misdemeanor and on conviction is punishable by a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000, by confinement in jail for not less than one month nor more than one year, or both.

Id., at 2886.

In other words, S.B. 464 provides that all offenses under chapter 47 of the code are punishable as Parks and Wildlife Code Class C misdemeanors as set forth in the bill, except for violations of sections 47.003(a) and 47.007 of the code; violation of those provisions is a Class B Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor. In addition, if someone is tried under sections 47.008, 47.016, or 47.038 and it is adduced at trial that that person was convicted within five years before the trial date of a violation of the section for which he is then being prosecuted, punishment upon conviction shall be upgraded to the punishment set forth in the bill for a Class B Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor.

S.B. 980, on the other hand, in effect carves out a set of exceptions to the punishments set out in S.B. 464, providing that violation of any of a list of specified sections is a misdemeanor to be punished by a fine of not less than $10 nor more than $200. In addition, anyone convicted of violating any of the specified sections is subject to forfeiture, for one year from the date of conviction, of any license held under the authority of those sections. S.B. 980 also provides that violation of any of a list of other specified sections is a misdemeanor and punishable by a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000, by confinement in jail for not less than one month nor more than one year, or both.

It is clear from a reading of both the bills and the bills' legislative histories that the legislature did not intend for the sections listed in S.B. 980 to comprise the exclusive list of sections of chapter 47 whose violation would subject the offender to punishment. S.B. 464 contains comprehensive "sunset" amendments to the code: the bill is entitled:

An Act relating to the continuation, composition, powers, and duties of the Parks and Wildlife Department; . . . to the enforcement of laws and regulations relating to activities permitted by licenses and permits issued by the Parks and Wildlife Department; to state recovery for certain violations of the Parks and Wildlife Code; to authorizing the Parks and Wildlife Department to recover damages for certain violations of the Water Code; providing penalty schedules for the Parks and Wildlife Code; . . . providing enforcement procedures and penalties.

Acts 1985, 69th Legislature, ch. 267 at 1251. The "Purpose of the Bill" set out in the Bill Analysis states that, among other purposes, the bill is intended to

provide the agency with greater authority for resource protection activities, enforcement functions and fees charged for department-related activities. Other changes the bill makes will establish a new penalty schedule for Parks and Wildlife Code violations and streamline various department activities.

Bill Analysis for S.B. 464. The Bill Analysis for Article 3 simply states:

Article III of this bill amends the Parks and Wildlife Code by: 1) establishing a new penalty schedule for Parks and Wildlife Code violations, and 2) deleting specific penalties listed throughout the code and substituting a reference to a penalty on the newly established penalty schedule.

S.B. 980, on the other hand, is intended to be of more limited scope; the bill is entitled:

An Act relating to regulation of transportation of and commerce in fish and other edible marine products and to records of convictions and their use; providing penalties. . . .

Acts 1985, 69th Leg., ch. 827 at 2885. The title goes on to list the specific sections of the code that the bill amends, including section 47.051 and subsection (a) of section 47.052. The Bill Analysis prepared for the original bill sets forth the purpose of the bill: "To strengthen the protections provided in legislation regulating the commercial harvest of redfish and speckled sea trout by imposing record-keeping requirements at all points of sale." The Bill Analysis prepared for the House Committee on Environmental Affairs contains a fuller statement of the purpose of the bill:

Senate Bill 980 proposes to establish the requirements by which seafood products may be bought and sold. Further, it provides the Commission with greater authority to regulate the importation of red drum and spotted seatrout for resale. Additionally, it proposes to provide for the monthly reporting of purchases, or if applicable, no purchases by seafood dealers.

(Bill Analysis on file in Legislative Reference Library.) There is nothing in the legislative history of S.B. 980 to support the contention that its penalty provisions are intended to supplant the provisions of the more comprehensive S.B. 464; it does nothing more than carve out a set of exceptions relating only to the harvesting and sale of certain species of fish.

Statutes that deal with the same general subject matter are considered as being in pari materia, even though they contain no reference to one another. In order to arrive at the proper statutory construction, all parts of the acts in pari materia will be construed together, as though they were parts of the same law. Any conflict between their provisions will be harmonized if possible, and effect will be given to all provisions of each act, if they can be made to stand together. State v. Dyer, 200 S.W.2d 813 (Tex. 1947); Wintermann v. McDonald, 102 S.W.2d 167 (Tex. 1937); Trimmier v. Carlton, 296 S.W. 1070 (Tex. 1927); Conley v. Daughters of the Republic of Texas, 156 S.W. 197 (Tex. 1913).

But in an instance in which conflicting statutes are enacted by the same session of the legislature, the latest expression of legislative intent prevails. Ex parte de Jesus de la O, 227 S.W.2d 212 (Tex. Crim. App. 1950); Attorney General Opinions MW-139 (1980); H-1115 (1978). Sutherland Statutory Construction offers the following rules:

In the absence of an irreconcilable conflict between two acts of the same session, each will be construed to operate within the limits of its own terms in a manner not to conflict with the other. However, when two acts of the same session cannot be harmonized or reconciled, that statute which is the latest enactment will operate to repeal a prior statute of the same session to the extent of any conflict in their terms.

Because the latest expression of the legislative will prevails, the statute last passed will prevail over a statute passed prior to it, irrespective of the time of taking effect. Where two acts of the same session take effect at the same time, the latest passed will prevail.

1A Sutherland Statutory Construction § 23.17 (4th ed.) (footnotes omitted).

In this instance, both bills were enacted during the 69th Legislature, and both deal with the same subject matter, namely punishments assessed for violations of the code. S.B. 464 first passed the Senate on March 11, 1985. The House passed the bill with amendments on May 16, 1985. The Senate concurred in the House amendments on May 21, 1985. S.B. 980 first passed the Senate on April 25, 1985. The House passed the bill with amendments on April 21, 1985. The Senate concurred in the House amendments on May 27, 1985. S.B. 980 was the last enacted statute and, therefore, represents the most recent expression of legislative intent on the subject. Accordingly, S.B. 980 prevails over S.B. 464 in the event that there are irreconcilable conflicts between the two. The only remaining issue is determining in just what instances there is such conflict.

The punishments to be assessed upon conviction of a violation are different under each bill, thereby rendering the two bills irreconcilably in conflict as to those specific sections set out in the later-enacted S.B. 980. Therefore, any punishments assessed for violation of sections 47.002, 47.003(a), 47.004 through 47.006, 47.008, 47.009 through 47.011, 47.012, 47.013 through 47.015, 47.017, 47.032 through 47.034, and 47.037 of the Parks and Wildlife Code must be assessed in accordance with the provisions of S.B. 980. Accordingly, the punishment to be assessed for violation of any of the sections listed above, except for sections 47.003(a), 47.007, and 47.012, shall be a fine of not less than $10 nor more than $100; in addition, anyone so convicted is subject to the forfeiture, for one year from the date of the conviction, of any license held under the authority of the listed sections. Punishment to be assessed for violation of sections 47.003(a), 47.007, and 47.012 shall be by a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000, by confinement in jail for a term of not less than one month nor more than one year, or by both.

The punishments to be assessed upon conviction for violation of the remaining sections of chapter 47 of the Parks and Wildlife Code must be assessed in accordance with the provisions of S.B. 464. Therefore, punishment for violation of any of the remaining sections of chapter 47 shall be a Class C Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor with punishment to be assessed as a fine of not less than $25 nor more than $500. S.B. 980 is silent as to enhancement of punishment for any prior convictions; accordingly, any specific enhancement provisions set forth in S.B. 464 will control. Therefore, pursuant to S.B. 464, if a person has a prior conviction within five years of the trial date under either section 47.008, 47.016, or 47.038 of the code and he is convicted of an offense under the section under which he has a prior conviction, punishment upon conviction is enhanced to the level of a Class B Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor.

SUMMARY

Any punishments assessed for violation of the following sections of the Parks and Wildlife Code must be assessed in accordance with the provisions of S.B. 980: sections 47.002, 47.003(a), 47.004 through 47.006, 47.008, 47.009 through 47.011, 47.012, 47.013 through 47.015, 47.017, 47.032 through 47.034, and 47.037. Therefore, the punishment to be assessed for violation of any of the sections listed above, except for sections 47.003(a), 47.007, and 47.012, is a fine of not less than $10 nor more than $100; additionally, anyone so convicted is subject to the forfeiture, for one year from the date of the conviction, of any license held under the authority of the listed sections. Punishment to be assessed for the violation of sections 47.003(a), 47.007, or 47.012 of the code shall be by a fine of not less than $100 nor more than $1,000, by confinement in jail for a term of not less than one month nor more than one year, or by both.

Punishments to be assessed for violation of the remaining sections of chapter 47 are governed by S.B. 464. Therefore, violation of any such section shall be a Class C Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor with punishment to be assessed as a fine of not less than $25 nor more than $500. S.B. 980 is silent as to enhancement of punishment for any prior convictions; accordingly, any specific enhancement provisions set forth in S.B. 464 will control. Therefore, pursuant to S.B. 464, if any person has a prior conviction within five years of the trial date under either sections 47.008, 47.016, or 47.038 of the code and he is convicted of an offense under the section for which he has a prior conviction, punishment upon conviction is enhanced to the level of a Class B Parks and Wildlife Code misdemeanor.

Very truly yours,

JIM MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas

MARY KELLER
First Assistant Attorney General

LOU MCCREARY
Executive Assistant Attorney General

JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLEY
Special Assistant Attorney General

RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee

Prepared by Jim Moellinger
Assistant Attorney General

[1] Section 12.403 also provides that section 12.41 of the Penal Code, which classifies convictions for offenses not obtained from prosecutions under that code, does not apply to offenses under the Parks and Wildlife Code.