TX JM-502 June 19, 1986

Did Texas abortion-reporting requirements apply to hospitals and physicians' offices that were exempt from a separate abortion-facility license in 1986?

Short answer: Yes. JM-502 concluded that every place where abortions were performed had to file the statutory reports, including hospitals and qualifying physicians' offices that were exempt from the act's separate licensing requirement.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1986. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Texas law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1986
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority in Texas courts but are not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. The opinion dates from 1986; verify current statutes and case law before relying on it.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Texas AG Opinion JM-502: Abortion Facility Reporting

Plain-English summary

The health commissioner asked whether the reporting duties in the Texas Abortion Facility Reporting and Licensing Act applied only to facilities licensed under that act or also to hospitals and physicians' offices exempt from that license. The opinion quoted the statutory definition of facility as "a place where abortions are performed." Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0502.pdf

JM-502 concluded that the exemption covered licensing only. It said: "The reporting requirements apply to any 'facility' -- in other words, to any 'place where abortions are performed.'" Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0502.pdf

The opinion also relied on the report form's requirement to state whether a facility was licensed under the act. It reasoned: "This would be surplusage unless unlicensed facilities had to report." Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0502.pdf

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1986. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Did the reporting rule apply only to abortion facilities licensed under article 4512.8?

No. JM-502's summary said the reporting requirements applied "to all facilities at which abortions are performed, not just to those facilities licensed under article 4512.8, V.T.C.S." Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0502.pdf

Did a hospital's separate license eliminate the abortion-reporting duty?

No. The opinion concluded that reporting covered "any facility licensed under the Hospital Licensing Act" as well as facilities licensed under article 4512.8. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0502.pdf

Did the same rule apply to a physician's office?

Yes, when abortions were performed there. JM-502 included "any facility that is the office of a physician who is licensed under the Medical Practices Act" within the reporting requirement. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0502.pdf

Why did the opinion distinguish licensing from reporting?

It said the legislature apparently considered "double licensing" unnecessary for hospitals and physicians already regulated under other laws, while abortion reports served at least partly statistical purposes. The opinion added: "It makes sense to compile statistics regarding abortions from all facilities at which abortions are performed, not just those licensed under article 4512.8." Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0502.pdf

Background and statutory framework

Section 4 required each facility to submit an annual report on every abortion performed there. The report could not identify the physician or patient, and the information held by the department was described as "strictly confidential" and outside the open-records law, subject to stated exceptions. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0502.pdf

Section 6(f) said the act did not require a hospital already licensed under the Texas Hospital Licensing Law or a physician's office to obtain the separate license, unless the office was used primarily to perform abortions. JM-502 read that text as a licensing exemption, not an exemption from the definition of facility or from reporting. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0502.pdf

Citations and references

  • Texas Abortion Facility Reporting and Licensing Act, article 4512.8, V.T.C.S.
  • article 4512.8, section 4, V.T.C.S.
  • Texas Hospital Licensing Law, article 4437f, V.T.C.S.
  • Medical Practice Act, article 4495b, V.T.C.S.
  • article 6252-17a, V.T.C.S.

Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0502.pdf

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF via OCR. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

The Attorney General of Texas

JIM MATTOX
Attorney General

June 19, 1986

Robert Bernstein, M.D.
Commissioner of Health
Texas Department of Health
1100 West 49th Street
Austin, Texas 78756

Opinion No. JM-502

Re: Whether the reporting requirements of section 4(a) of article 4512.8, V.T.C.S., the Texas Abortion Facility Reporting and Licensing Act, apply to both licensed and unlicensed facilities

Dear Dr. Bernstein:

You ask about the scope of the reporting requirements set out in the Texas Abortion Facility Reporting and Licensing Act, article 4512.8, V.T.C.S.

The act sets out the following reporting requirements, which apply to any "facility":

Sec. 4. (a) Each facility must submit an annual report to the [Department of Health] on each abortion that is performed at the facility on a form provided by the department. The report shall not identify by any means the physician performing the abortion or the patient on whom the abortion was performed. The report shall include the following information:

(1) whether or not the facility at which the abortion is performed is licensed under this article;

(2) patient's year of birth, race, marital status, and state and county of residence;

(3) type of abortion procedure;

(4) the date the abortion was performed;

(5) whether the patient survived the abortion, and if the patient did not survive, the cause of death;

(6) the period of gestation based on the best medical judgment of the attending physician at the time of the procedure;

(7) the date, if known, of the patient's last menstrual cycle;

(8) the number of previous live births of the patient;

(9) the number of previous induced abortions of the patient.

(b) All information and records held by the department under the provisions of this article shall be strictly confidential and not considered open records for the purposes of Chapter 424, Acts of the 63rd Legislature, Regular Session, 1973, as amended (Article 6252-17a, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes). Such information shall not be released or made public upon subpoena or otherwise, except that release may be made under the following circumstances:

(1) release is made for statistical purposes only, so that no person, patient or facility may be identified; or

(2) release is made with the consent of each person, patient and facility identified in the information released; or

(3) release is made to medical personnel, appropriate state agencies, or county and district courts to enforce the provisions of this article.

(c) A violation of this section is punishable as a Class A misdemeanor.

Art. 4512.8, § 4. The act defines "facility" as "a place where abortions are performed." Art. 4512.8, § 2(1).

The act also provides that a person may not establish or operate a "facility" without "the appropriate license issued under this article." Art. 4512.8, § 5. Section 6(f), however, provides:

Nothing in this article shall be construed to require a facility licensed under the Texas Hospital Licensing Law (Article 4437f, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) or the office of a physician licensed under the Medical Practice Act (Article 4495b, Vernon's Texas Civil Statutes) to obtain a license under this article, unless such office is utilized primarily for the purpose of performing abortions. (Emphasis added.)

You ask:

Do the reporting requirements set forth in section 4(a) of article 4512.8, V.T.C.S., apply only to licensed facilities or to both licensed facilities and the facilities which are exempt from licensure under section 6(f) of that act?

We conclude that the reporting requirements apply to any place where abortions are performed, including a place licensed under the Hospital Licensing Law, article 4437f, V.T.C.S., or a place that is the office of a physician licensed under the Medical Practice Act, article 4495b, V.T.C.S. Section 6(f) exempts certain places from the licensing requirements only. Also, it refers to the places exempted as "facilities." In other words, the licensing exemption only makes certain places exempt from licensing requirements. It does not exempt those places from the definition of "facility." The reporting requirements apply to any "facility" -- in other words, to any "place where abortions are performed." Therefore, the plain language of article 4512.8 requires us to conclude that the reporting requirements of article 4512.8 apply to any facility licensed under the Hospital Licensing Act and any facility that is the office of a physician who is licensed under the Medical Practices Act as well as any facility licensed under article 4512.8. Also, section 4(a)(1) requires reporting of whether the "facility" "is licensed under this article." This would be surplusage unless unlicensed facilities had to report.

Also, we think there is an obvious reason for exempting certain facilities from the licensing requirements but not from the reporting requirements. The exemption from the licensing requirements under article 4512.8 applies only to facilities licensed under the Hospital Licensing Law or to the offices of physicians who are licensed under the Medical Practices Act. Apparently the legislature determined that "double licensing" is unnecessary or undesirable because the licensing requirements of those acts ensure the standards of care that the licensing requirements of article 4512.8 are intended to ensure. The reporting requirements of article 4512.8, on the other hand, are at least in part for statistical purposes. See art. 4512.8, § 4(b)(1). It makes sense to compile statistics regarding abortions from all facilities at which abortions are performed, not just those licensed under article 4512.8.

Therefore, we conclude that the reporting requirements of article 4512.8 apply to any place where abortions are performed, regardless of whether the place is exempt from the licensing requirements of article 4512.8.

SUMMARY

The reporting requirements of article 4512.8, section 4, V.T.C.S., apply to all facilities at which abortions are performed, not just to those facilities licensed under article 4512.8, V.T.C.S.

JIM MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas

JACK HIGHTOWER
First Assistant Attorney General

MARY KELLER
Executive Assistant Attorney General

ROBERT GRAY
Special Assistant Attorney General

RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee

Prepared by Sarah Woelk
Assistant Attorney General

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1986 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.