TX JM-441 February 21, 1986

Could a municipal or justice court charge traffic defendants or defensive-driving providers an administrative or referral fee under article 6701d, section 143A?

Short answer: No. JM-441 concluded that section 143A authorized no administrative or referral fee against either defendants or defensive-driving course providers.

Apply this to your situation

This page answers the general question as of 1986. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Texas law, with citations.

Currency note: this opinion is from 1986
Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Disclaimer: This is an official Texas Attorney General opinion. AG opinions are persuasive authority in Texas courts but are not binding precedent. This summary is for informational purposes only and is not legal advice. The opinion dates from 1986; verify current statutes and case law before relying on it.
About this page: The plain-English summary, reader guidance, and Q&A below were written by Ezel based on the official AG opinion. The original opinion (linked on this page as a PDF) is the authoritative source for any reliance.
View original AG opinion (PDF)

Texas AG Opinion JM-441: Defensive-Driving Administrative Fees

Plain-English summary

Article 6701d, section 143A allowed certain misdemeanor charges to be dismissed when a defendant completed a driving-safety course approved by the Department of Public Safety or the court. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0441.pdf

A municipal court had arranged to give defendants a list of approved course providers, which paid the court a fee for each section 143A defendant who completed a course. The fees funded administration of the dismissal program. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0441.pdf

JM-441 concluded that neither defendants nor course providers could be charged an administrative or referral fee because section 143A supplied no statutory authority for either charge. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0441.pdf

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1986. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

Common questions

Could the court charge the traffic defendant an administrative fee?

No. JM-441 applied the rule that a governmental fee could not be charged unless the law authorized it, and section 143A contained no such authorization. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0441.pdf

Could the court instead charge the defensive-driving provider a referral fee?

No. The opinion said the lack of statutory authority applied to fees imposed on course providers as well as defendants. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0441.pdf

Did the Code of Criminal Procedure recognize any court fee in a related traffic setting?

Yes. A related Code provision authorized a special fee for issuing and serving an arrest warrant for violating a promise to appear under article 6701d, section 149, but that did not authorize the section 143A administrative or referral fee at issue. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0441.pdf

Background and statutory framework

Section 143A required the defensive-driving course to be approved by the Texas Department of Public Safety or by the court. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0441.pdf

The opinion also cited Code of Criminal Procedure article 45.07, which said an ordinance could not provide for costs, and contrasted the expressly authorized warrant fee in article 45.06. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0441.pdf

Citations and references

  • article 6701d, V.T.C.S., section 143A
  • Code of Criminal Procedure article 45.06
  • Code of Criminal Procedure article 45.07
  • Attorney General Opinion JM-346 (1985)
  • Attorney General Opinions JM-357 (1985), JM-165 (1984), JM-158 (1984), JM-153 (1984), JM-113 (1983), and JM-22 (1983)

Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1986/jm0441.pdf

Source

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF via OCR. Minor errors may remain; the linked PDF is authoritative.

The Attorney General of Texas

JIM MATTOX
Attorney General

February 21, 1986

Honorable David Cain
Chairman
Committee on Transportation
Texas House of Representatives
P.O. Box 2910
Austin, Texas 78769

Opinion No. JM-441

Re: Whether administrative fees may be assessed by a justice of the peace or a municipal judge in traffic cases arising under article 6701d, section 143A, V.T.C.S.

Dear Representative Cain:

You ask the following two questions:

  1. May municipal and justice of the peace courts assess an administrative fee to defendants in administering provisions of article 6701d, section 143A, V.T.C.S.?

  2. May municipal and justice of the peace courts assess an administrative referral fee to Texas Department of Safety approved or licensed Class 4 CDTS schools which provide driver safety courses to section 143A defendants?

Section 143A of article 6701d provides for the dismissal of certain misdemeanor charges upon completion of a driving safety course by the defendant. The defensive driving course must be one approved by the Texas Department of Public Safety or by the court. See V.T.C.S. art. 6701d, § 143A(a)(1), (2). You state that a municipal court contracted with certain providers of approved courses to present a list of the providers to section 143A defendants. In return, the course provider pays the municipal court a fee for each course completion by a section 143A defendant. These fees are used to defray the costs of administering the section 143A dismissal program.

It is well-established that a fee may not be charged unless the fee is provided for by law. Attorney General Opinion JM-346 (1985); see also Attorney General Opinions JM-357 (1985); JM-165, JM-158, JM-153 (1984); JM-113, JM-22 (1983). Article 6701d does not authorize the imposition of an administrative referral fee either against defendants or against the providers of defensive driving courses. See also Code Crim. Proc. art. 45.07 (no costs shall be provided for by ordinance); cf. Code Crim. Proc. art. 45.06 (authorizing special fee for the issuance and service of warrant of arrest for violating promise to appear under section 149 of article 6701d).

SUMMARY

Article 6701d does not authorize the imposition of an administrative referral fee in cases arising under the section 143A program for the dismissal of certain misdemeanor charges upon completion of a driving safety course by defendant. No such fee may be assessed against section 143A defendants or against the providers of driving safety courses without statutory authorization.

Very truly yours,

JIM MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas

JACK HIGHTOWER
First Assistant Attorney General

MARY KELLER
Executive Assistant Attorney General

ROBERT GRAY
Special Assistant Attorney General

RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee

Prepared by Jennifer Riggs
Assistant Attorney General

Get today's answer for your situation

You just read a 1986 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.

Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.