Could a Texas municipal court try a 15- or 16-year-old for a nontraffic Class C misdemeanor when the child had fewer than three prior convictions?
Apply this to your situation
This page answers the general question as of 1985. Ezel answers yours: what it means for your facts, under current Texas law, with citations.
Texas AG Opinion JM-316: Juveniles in Municipal Court
Plain-English summary
The question concerned a nontraffic Class C misdemeanor involving a 15- or 16-year-old with fewer than three prior Class C misdemeanors. The opinion stated: “You have asked whether a municipal court has jurisdiction to try a Class C misdemeanor offense, excluding traffic offenses, involving a fifteen or sixteen-year-old defendant who has fewer than three prior Class C misdemeanors.” Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0316.pdf
JM-316 concluded that the municipal court lacked jurisdiction and had to transfer an instituted prosecution to juvenile court under Family Code section 51.08. The opinion stated: “A municipal court does not have jurisdiction over these offenses because if prosecution is instituted in a municipal court, section 51.08 of the Family Code requires that the case be transferred to juvenile court.” Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0316.pdf
The opinion tied that result to the juvenile court's exclusive jurisdiction unless jurisdiction had been waived. It stated: “Unless jurisdiction is waived, the juvenile court then has exclusive jurisdiction of delinquent conduct and conduct indicating a need for supervision of a juvenile and the proceedings under title 3 of the Family Code, which are not criminal prosecutions.” Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0316.pdf
A later 1985 opinion limited JM-316's reach for minors accused of Alcoholic Beverage Code offenses. JM-380 stated: “Accordingly, Attorney General Opinion JM-316 (1985) is not applicable to the prosecution of minors, fifteen- or sixteen-year-olds, who have violated any provision of chapter 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Code.” Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0380.pdf
Currency note
This opinion was issued in 1985. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.
Common questions
Could the municipal court try the ordinary nontraffic Class C case described in JM-316?
No. The opinion's summary said: “A municipal court does not have jurisdiction over a Class C misdemeanor offense involving a juvenile who has fewer than three prior Class C misdemeanor convictions.” Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0316.pdf
What was the municipal court required to do after a prosecution began there?
The case had to be transferred to juvenile court. JM-316 stated that section 51.08 “requires that the case be transferred to juvenile court.” Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0316.pdf
Did JM-316 decide the rule for traffic offenses?
No. The stated question expressly concerned a Class C misdemeanor “excluding traffic offenses.” Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0316.pdf
Did JM-316 treat the juvenile-court proceeding as a criminal prosecution?
No. It described proceedings under title 3 of the Family Code as proceedings “which are not criminal prosecutions.” Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0316.pdf
Did JM-316 control later cases involving chapter 106 alcohol offenses?
No. JM-380 later said JM-316 “is not applicable” to prosecutions of 15- or 16-year-olds for violations of chapter 106 of the Alcoholic Beverage Code. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0380.pdf
Background and statutory framework
JM-316 reproduced Family Code section 51.08. Its operative direction began: “If the defendant in a criminal proceeding is a child who is charged with an offense other than perjury or a traffic offense,” and required the criminal court to transfer the case to juvenile court unless the child had been transferred to criminal court under section 54.02. Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0316.pdf
The quoted statute also required the criminal court to send the accusatory pleading and related papers and to place the child as directed pending the juvenile-court appearance. It said the criminal court “shall transfer the case to the juvenile court, together with a copy of the accusatory pleading and other papers, documents, and transcripts of testimony relating to the case.” Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0316.pdf
The opinion separately directed readers to Penal Code section 8.07 with the sentence: “See also Penal Code §8.07.” Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0316.pdf
Citations and references
- Family Code §51.08
- Family Code §54.02
- Penal Code §8.07
- Attorney General Opinion JM-380 (1985), later treatment concerning chapter 106 alcohol offenses
Source for JM-316 citations: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0316.pdf
Source for JM-380 later treatment: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0380.pdf
Source
- Landing page: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinions/jim-mattox/jm-0316
- Original PDF: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1985/jm0316.pdf
Original opinion text
Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Minor errors may remain. The linked PDF is authoritative.
The Attorney General of Texas
May 10, 1985
Honorable Oscar Mauzy
Chairman
Committee on Jurisprudence
Texas State Senate
P. O. Box 12068, Capitol Station
Austin, Texas 78711
Opinion No. JM-316
Re: Whether a municipal court has jurisdiction to try a Class C non-traffic misdemeanor case involving a defendant under the age of seventeen
Dear Senator Mauzy:
You have asked whether a municipal court has jurisdiction to try a Class C misdemeanor offense, excluding traffic offenses, involving a fifteen or sixteen-year-old defendant who has fewer than three prior Class C misdemeanors, including the one to be tried. Section 51.08 of the Family Code reads as follows:
If the defendant in a criminal proceeding is a child who is charged with an offense other than perjury or a traffic offense, unless he has been transferred to criminal court under Section 54.02 of this code, the court exercising criminal jurisdiction shall transfer the case to the juvenile court, together with a copy of the accusatory pleading and other papers, documents, and transcripts of testimony relating to the case, and shall order that the child be taken to the place of detention designated by the juvenile court, or shall release him to the custody of his parent, guardian, or custodian, to be brought before the juvenile court at a time designated by that court.
See also Penal Code §8.07.
A municipal court does not have jurisdiction over these offenses because if prosecution is instituted in a municipal court, section 51.08 of the Family Code requires that the case be transferred to juvenile court. Unless jurisdiction is waived, the juvenile court then has exclusive jurisdiction of delinquent conduct and conduct indicating a need for supervision of a juvenile and the proceedings under title 3 of the Family Code, which are not criminal prosecutions.
SUMMARY
A municipal court does not have jurisdiction over a Class C misdemeanor offense involving a juvenile who has fewer than three prior Class C misdemeanor convictions.
Very truly yours,
JIM MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas
TOM GREEN
First Assistant Attorney General
DAVID R. RICHARDS
Executive Assistant Attorney General
ROBERT GRAY
Special Assistant Attorney General
RICK GILPIN
Chairman, Opinion Committee
Prepared by Tony Guillory
Assistant Attorney General
APPROVED:
OPINION COMMITTEE
Rick Gilpin, Chairman
Jon Bible
Colin Carl
Susan Garrison
Tony Guillory
Jim Moellinger
Jennifer Riggs
Nancy Sutton
Get today's answer for your situation
You just read a 1985 opinion on this question. Ezel checks the current Texas statutes and case law and answers your specific situation, with citations.
Opens in Ezel Pro. Every answer cites the law it relies on.