In 1990, did Mexican commercial truck drivers need Texas driver's licenses to operate in Texas?

Mexican commercial drivers and Texas licensing in 1990

Plain-English summary

Texas Attorney General Jim Mattox concluded in 1990 that Mexican operators of commercial vehicles covered by former article 6687b could not use its nonresident reciprocity exemption unless Mexico recognized comparable Texas licenses or another reciprocal arrangement existed. The opinion found no such arrangement and read Mexico's reservations to the 1943 Convention on the Regulation of Inter-American Automotive Traffic as limiting the treaty to private, non-profit vehicles.

"Absent a reciprocal arrangement between Mexico and Texas or the United States for the recognition of commercial driver's licenses or any Mexican legislation allowing licensed Texas commercial drivers to operate their vehicles on Mexican highways without obtaining local licenses, an exemption under section 3(e) of article 6687b is not available."

Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1990/jm1226.pdf

For vehicles covered by the then-new Texas Commercial Driver's License Act, article 6687b-2, the opinion concluded that a Mexican driver needed a license required by Texas law until the federal government found Mexico's testing and licensing standards satisfactory. Before Texas began issuing nonresident commercial driver's licenses, the opinion said the driver could use an appropriate article 6687b license or a nonresident commercial driver's license from another state that Texas had to recognize. After Texas began issuing them, the driver needed a qualifying nonresident commercial driver's license from Texas or another recognized state.

"Until the federal government determines that Mexico's testing and licensing standards satisfy applicable federal requirements, a Mexican operator of a commercial motor vehicle within the scope of the Texas Commercial Driver's License Act, V.T.C.S. article 6687b-2, must obtain a Texas driver's license as required by state law."

Source: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1990/jm1226.pdf

The answer depended on which statutory definition covered the vehicle. The opinion did not have facts about vehicle weight, passenger capacity, or hazardous-material status, so it analyzed the two licensing statutes through separate assumptions.

Currency note

This opinion was issued in 1990. Subsequent statutory amendments, court decisions, or later AG opinions may have changed the analysis. Treat this page as historical context, not current legal advice. Verify current law before relying on any specific rule, deadline, or remedy mentioned here.

What the opinion said for affected groups in 1990

Mexican commercial drivers

A Mexican license alone did not establish the reciprocity needed under former article 6687b. For vehicles within article 6687b-2, the available license depended on whether Texas had begun issuing nonresident commercial driver's licenses and whether another state's license qualified for recognition.

Texas motor carriers and border operations

The opinion treated the licensing result as vehicle-specific. Weight rating, passenger capacity, and hazardous-material transportation determined whether the newer commercial-driver statute applied.

Department of Public Safety

The opinion construed section 17 of article 6687b-2 as allowing Texas to issue nonresident commercial driver's licenses unless the federal government had determined that the foreign jurisdiction's standards met federal requirements.

Border county attorneys and enforcement officials

The opinion separated the reciprocity rule under article 6687b from the federal-standards system under article 6687b-2. It did not decide which act covered any particular vehicle because the request supplied no vehicle specifications.

Common questions

Did the 1943 automotive treaty let Mexican commercial drivers use Mexican licenses in Texas?

No. The opinion relied on Mexico's reservations, which limited its approval to private vehicles not used for profit and left passenger and freight service subject to Mexican legislation.

Was every Mexican commercial driver required to obtain the same Texas license?

No. The answer turned on which former statute covered the vehicle and on the stage of Texas's transition to commercial driver's licenses.

Could a license from another U.S. state satisfy Texas law?

Yes, if it was a nonresident commercial driver's license entitled to recognition in Texas under section 31(a) of article 6687b-2.

Did the opinion decide whether a particular truck fell under article 6687b or article 6687b-2?

No. The request did not provide the weight, passenger capacity, or other vehicle characteristics needed for that determination.

Why did the opinion discuss federal regulations?

Article 6687b-2 implemented the federal Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986. The opinion used the federal single-license system and standards determinations to interpret Texas recognition and nonresident-license provisions.

Background and legal framework

Former article 6687b generally required a Texas driver's license unless an exemption applied. Section 3(e) extended a nonresident exemption only when the driver's home state or country recognized comparable Texas licenses and gave Texas drivers the same privilege.

The Convention on the Regulation of Inter-American Automotive Traffic promoted cross-border recognition of vehicle and driver documents. The opinion concluded that Mexico's reservations excluded profit-making and public-service passenger or freight vehicles, so the treaty did not supply commercial-license reciprocity.

The 1989 Texas Commercial Driver's License Act, article 6687b-2, implemented the federal Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986. It defined covered commercial vehicles by weight, passenger capacity, and hazardous-material carriage. It also created nonresident commercial driver's licenses and recognition rules for licenses from other states and qualifying foreign jurisdictions.

The opinion cited Hidalgo County Appraisal District v. Engfar N.V., 756 S.W.2d 754, 756 (Tex. Civ. App. - Corpus Christi 1988, no writ), for the rule that conflicting state law was invalid to the extent of conflict with a United States treaty. The reporter citation identifies a Texas intermediate appellate decision.

Key citations

• V.T.C.S. article 6687b, sections 2(a), 3(e), and 4A
• V.T.C.S. article 6687b-2, sections 3, 9, 11, 17, 21, and 31
• 49 U.S.C. app. §§ 2701-16
• 49 C.F.R. part 383
• Convention on the Regulation of Inter-American Automotive Traffic, 61 Stat. 1129, T.I.A.S. No. 1567
• U.S. Const. art. VI, cl. 2
• Hidalgo County Appraisal District v. Engfar N.V., 756 S.W.2d 754 (Tex. Civ. App. - Corpus Christi 1988, no writ)

Source

• Landing page: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/opinions/jim-mattox/jm-1226
• Original PDF: https://www.texasattorneygeneral.gov/sites/default/files/opinion-files/opinion/1990/jm1226.pdf

Original opinion text

Best-effort transcription from a scanned PDF. Obvious character-level OCR errors have been corrected where verified against the scan and reporter citation; minor errors may remain. The linked PDF is authoritative.

THE ATTORNEY GENERAL
OF TEXAS

Jim MATTOX September 19, 1990
ATTORNEY GENERAL

Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr. Opinion No. JM-1226 County Attorney

Cameron County Courthouse Re: Whether Mexican op- 974 E. Harrison Street erators of motor vehicles Brownsville, Texas 78520 used for commercial pur-

poses must obtain Texas
driver’s licenses
(RQ-1975)

Dear Mr. Euresti:

Your request concerns the state licensing requirements that must be satisfied prior to driving commercial motor vehicles in Texas. Two state statutes currently regulate the issuance and continuance of driver’s licenses whose possession authorizes the holders to drive various motor vehicles in Texas. Those statutes are articles 6687b and 6687b-2, V.T.C.S. Since your request focuses on article 6687b, we first address your questions under that statute.

Section 2(a) of article 6687b provides that unless expressly exempted by the act, no person may drive a motor vehicle on a highway in Texas without a driver’s license issued in accordance with the act. You ask whether section 3(e) of article 6687b exempts Mexican commercial truck operators driving Mexican commercial vehicles in Texas from the license requirements of the act.1 You also ask whether

1. We assume for purposes of this opinion that the
   Mexican commercial drivers are not Texas residents, but are instead Mexican residents who are entitled to the benefit of Mexican laws and treaties. See Attorney General Opinion JM-611 (1986) (concluding article 6687b exempts persons holding valid driver’s licenses from other states or countries only if such persons are not Texas residents); see also 37 T.A.C. § 15.1(2) (defining "resident" for driver’s licenses purposes as a person domiciled in Texas), 15.1(3) (classifying all others as "nonresidents").

p. 6507

Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr. - Page 2 (JM-1226)

an exemption under section 3(e) is dependent on a reciprocal exemption by Mexico of commercial drivers licensed by Texas.

Section 3(e) of the act exempts from the act’s license requirements:

Any nonresident who is at least eighteen (18) years of age and who has in his’ imme- diate possession a valid Class A or Class B driver’s license or similar license issued to him by his home state shall not be required to secure such license under this Act, pro- vided the state or country of his residence likewise recognizes such licenses issued by the State of Texas and exempts the holders thereof from securing such licenses from such foreign state or country. The purpose of this section is to extend full reciprocity to citizens of other states and foreign countries which extend like privileges to citizens of the State of Texas. (Emphasis added.)

Possession of either a valid Class A or B license or a valid Class C license, the other motor vehicle license issued under the act, authorizes the use of motor vehicles based on their weight ratings or passenger capacity and thus covers vehicles used for both commercial and noncommercial reasons. V.T.C.S. art. 6687b, § 4A(b)-(d); see also id. § 1: V.T.C.S. art. 6701d, § 2(a)-(b) (cited provisions read together define "motor vehicle" for purposes of article 6687b to cover in general vehicles used for the transportation of persons or property by highway). Article 6687b-2 also uses a vehicle classification system that is based in part on weight ratings or passenger capacity. Since you did not present and we are not otherwise in possession of particular facts describing the weight ratings, passenger capacity, or other characteristics of the motor vehicles in issue, we cannot determine whether the licensing provisions of article 6687b or 6687b-2 apply to them. Thus, we first assume that the vehicles are within the scope of the licensing provisions of article 6687b, and later for purposes of our discussion of article 6687b-2, we assume that the vehicles

p. 6508

Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr. - Page 3 (JM-1226)

are within the reach of the licensing provisions of article 6687b-2.2

The predecessor of section 3(e), formerly codified as section 3(4), exempted prior to 1947 only residents of other states who held chauffeur’s licenses. Acts 1941, 47th Leg., ch. 173, § 3(4), at 247-48. In 1947 the legislature passed House Bill 293 and extended the exemption in section 3(4) to residents of other states who held operator’s or commercial operator’s licenses and to other nonresidents who possessed operator’s, chauffeur’s, or commercial operator’s licenses or similar licenses from their home governments “provided the State or Country of .. . [their] residence likewise recognizes such licenses issued by the State of Texas and exempts the holders thereof from securing such licenses from such foreign State or Country." Acts 1947, 50th Leg., ch. 108, § 1, at 171. The caption and the emergency clause show that the legislature intended to extend reciprocity to citizens of other states and foreign countries that extended a similar exemption to Texas residents. Id. at 171-72.

Soon after the passage of House Bill 293, this office issued Attorney General Opinion V-980 (1949), which held that this state could automatically suspend the driving pri- vileges of a nonresident holding an out-of-state license who was convicted of an offense under article 6687b and take custody of the nonresident’s out-of-state license. It stated that section 3(4) had extended Texas driving pri- vileges to nonresidents only if they had in their immediate possession an appropriate out-of-state license and if reciprocity was "present between that State and this State as to recognition of each State’s licenses." Attorney General Opinion V-980 at 3.

The 1983 amendments to article 6687b reclassified section 3(4) to section 3(e) and modified the language of the 1947 amendment to reflect the change to alphabetical licenses covering vehicles based on their weight ratings or

2. Our subsequent discussion of article 6687b-2 will
   show that the enactment of that article removed from the scope of the licensing provisions of article 6687b a significant number of vehicles used for commercial purposes. That discussion will also show that the licensing require- ments of article 6687b continue to apply to some commercial vehicles.

p. 6509

Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr. - Page 4 (JM-1226)

passenger capacity. See Acts 1983, 68th Leg., ch. 345, § 2, at 1797.

Neither the provisions of House Bill 293 nor the current language of section 3(e) makes a distinction for purposes of the exemption between drivers of commercial and noncommercial vehicles. Consequently, an exemption under section 3(e) is available to a nonresident with regard to any motor vehicle currently within the scope of the licensing provisions of article 6687b, including one used for commercial purposes, but only if reciprocity is present between Texas and the nonresident’s home government with regard to similar driver’s licenses and the nonresident has a valid license issued to him by his home government. Furthermore, according to the current as well as past versions of the exemption, the nonresident must be 18 years of age or older.

Even assuming the Mexican drivers in issue are 18 years or older and possess appropriate Mexican licenses, you have not mentioned any reciprocal arrangement between Mexico and the United States or Texas with regard to licenses authorizing the use of motor vehicles for commercial purposes or any Mexican legislation allowing licensed Texas commercial drivers to operate their vehicles on Mexican highways without obtaining local licenses. Mexico and the United States, however, are signatories to a 1943 treaty that covers the use of certain motor vehicles in each country. That treaty, the Convention on the Regulation of Inter-American Automotive Traffic (hereinafter the Convention) was opened for signature at the Pan American Union on December 15, 1943. C. Bevans, 3 Treaties and Other International Agreements of the United States of America 1776-1949 at 865 (1969) (contains reproduction of treaty) (hereinafter “Bevans"); see also 61 Stat. 1129;

T.I.A.S. No. 1567 (also contains reproductions).

The Convention facilitates the movement of motor vehicles among the American republics by agreeing to the acceptance of each individual republic’s licensing of vehicle operators and registration of vehicles and providing for the recognition of international vehicle certificates and driver’s licenses. Article II of the Convention defines a motor vehicle "as any self-propelled vehicle circulating upon a public highway without the need of rails and used for the transport of persons or merchandise." 3 Bevans at 866. The term "merchandise" is not defined by the Convention, although "highway" is defined "as any public way maintained for and open to the use of the public for purposes of vehicular travel." Id. The Convention does not expressly

p. 6510

Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr. - Page 5 (JM-1226)

refer to vehicles used for commercial purposes. See H. Kelly, American Interest in International Motor Travel, XVII Dep’t of State Bull. 1063, 1066-67 (1947) (Convention silent with regard to problem presented by trucks and buses; little expectation in 1940s of commercial vehicle traffic developing over long distances).

The United States signed the Convention on December 31, 1943, and the Senate subsequently ratified it during the summer of 1946. Upon deposit of the ratification on October 29, 1946, the treaty became effective with regard to the United States. 3 Bevans at 865.

Mexico signed the treaty on April 14, 1949, with reser- vations, ratified it on April 30, 1949, and deposited its ratification on June 24, 1949. 3 Bevans at 875; Division of Law and Treaties, Pan American Union, Inter-American Treaties and Conventions: Signatures, Ratifications, and Deposits with Explanatory Notes 98 (1954). Mexico’s reser- vations to the treaty provide:

1. The approval which the Government of
   Mexico grants is limited to the passage of private vehicles which carry their owners, family, or friends and which are not used for purposes of profit, and

2. Vehicles, destined for public service,
   in carrying passengers and freight, will continue to be subject to the dispositions of Mexican legislation.

See U.S. Dep’t of State, United States Treaty Developments (Dec. 1950) (updating T.I.A.S. No. 1567 since December 15, 1943). We are unaware of any subsequent change or addition to the Convention. We are also unaware of any United States opinion construing either the Convention or the reservations to the Convention by Mexico. The Convention is still in force between the United States and Mexico. See U.S. Dep’t

of State, Treaties in Force: A List of Treaties and Other International Agreements of the United States in Force on January 1, 1990 at 286.

Given Mexico’s reservations to the Convention, we con- clude that the Convention does not establish an arrangement between Mexico and the United States for the reciprocal

p. 6511

Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr. - Page 6 (JM-1226)

recognition of commercial driver’s licenses. 3 Since you have not mentioned and we have not been able to locate any other arrangement between the two countries with regard to reciprocal recognition of commercial driver’s licenses or any Mexican legislation, we conclude that an exemption is not currently available under section 3(e) of article 6687b to Mexican operators who use commercial motor vehicles that are within the scope of the licensing provisions of article 6687b.

We next address your questions under the new Texas Commercial Driver’s License Act, article 6687b-2, V.T.C.S. Article 6687b-2 was added by House Bill 1935 of the 71st Legislative Session, which also amended various provisions of article 6687b to reflect the new act. Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 236, §§ 1, 3-8, at 1086-1100. Article 6687b-2 generally became effective April 1, 1990, the date on which the amendments to article 6687b took effect.4

Article 6687b-2 regulates the issuance and continuance of driver’s licenses for the use of certain commercial motor vehicles. Licenses issued under article 6687b-2 are de- scribed as commercial driver’s licenses and authorize individuals to drive various classes of commercial motor

3. Texas has had in effect since 1976 regulations
   providing that the reciprocal privileges described in the 1943 Convention are limited to private vehicles. See 37 T.A.C. § 15.91(a)-(b), (d)(2) (all commercial buses, trucks and trailers are excluded). Since treaties entered into by the United States are the supreme law of the land, we base our conclusion not on these regulations but on the 1943 Con- vention as signed with reservations by Mexico. See U.S.

Const. art. VI, cl. 2; see also Hidalgo County Appraisal District v. Engfar N.V., 756 S.W.2d 754, 756 (Tex. Civ. App. -

Corpus Christi 1988, no writ) (state law in conflict with United States treaties are invalid to the extent of the conflict).

4. We address your questions under article 6687b-2
   solely with regard to Mexican operators of commercial motor vehicles and in light of the 1943 Convention and the reservations to that treaty filed by Mexico. Since the United States may have different arrangements with other countries concerning automotive traffic, we do not address the application of article 6687b-2 to residents of those other countries.

p. 6512

Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr. - Page 7 (JM-1226)

vehicles. V.T.C.S. art. 6687b-2, §§ 3(3), 21. Section 3(6) of the act defines “commercial motor vehicle" for purposes of article 6687b-2 as:

(A] motor vehicle or combination of motor vehicles used to transport passengers or property if the motor vehicle:

(A) has a gross combination weight rating of 26,001 or more pounds inclusive of a towed unit with a gross vehicle weight rating of more than 10,000 pounds;

(B) has a gross vehicle weight rating of 26,001 or more pounds;

(C) is designed to transport 16 or more passengers, including the driver; or

(D) is transporting hazardous materials and is required to be placarded in accordance with 49 C.F.R. Part 172, Subpart F.

Section 21(b) of article 6687b-2, which took effect April 1, 1990, authorizes the issuance of commercial driver’s licenses with Class A, B, and C classifications encompassing vehicles classified according to weight rating and passenger capacity. See also V.T.C.S. art. 6687b-2, § 3(6).

The weight ratings and passenger capacity criteria used in sections 3(6) and 21(b) of article 6687b-2 are similar to the ratings and capacity criteria used in section 4A of article 6687b. See V.T.C.S. art. 6687b, § 4(9) (resolving the overlap between the two statutes). On or after the date the Department of Public Safety (hereinafter the department) begins issuance of commercial driver’s licenses under article 6687b-2, the department may not issue to drivers Class A or B licenses under article 6687b unless the drivers first provide sworn affidavits stating that the vehicles that they will thereafter drive, requiring article 6687b Class A or Class B driver’s licenses, are exempted from the definition of commercial motor vehicle in article 6687b-2. Id. We understand that the department intends to begin

oo

p. 6513

Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr. - Page 8 (JM-1226)

issuing commercial driver’s licenses within the next few months .5

Section 11(a) of article 6687b-2 provides that the department may not generally issue a commercial driver’s license to a person unless Texas is the person’s state of domicile. Section 3(28) defines “state of domicile" as "the state where a person has the person’s true, fixed, and permanent home and principal residence and to which the person intends to return whenever absent." Section 3(27) defines "state" as a state of the United States or the District of Columbia. Thus, foreign countries are not included within the term "state."

Section 17 of article 6687b-2, however, gives the department discretionary authority to issue nonresident con- mercial driver’s licenses. "Nonresident commercial driver’s licenses" are “commercial driver’s licenses" for purposes of article 6687b-2 that are issued by a state to a resident of a foreign jurisdiction. See V.T.C.S. art. 6687b-2, § 3(23); see also id. § 3(3) (defining "commercial driver’s license" to include any license that authorizes the operation of

a,

5. Until the department begins issuing commercial

driver’s licenses, an article 6687b license that is renewed which permits the driving of a commercial motor vehicle as described in article 6687b-2 continues in effect until the earlier of April 1, 1992, or the date on which the license expires or is suspended, revoked, or cancelled. April 1, 1992 is the effective date of the prohibition in section 9 of article 6687b-2 that provides a person may not drive a commercial motor vehicle covered by the new act without possession of a valid commercial driver’s license. Acts 1989, 71st Leg., ch. 236, § 12, at 1101. Id. § 12(b).

6. The purpose of article 6687b-2 is to implement the
   federal Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986, 49 U.S.C. app. §§ 2701-16. V.T.C.S. art. 6687b-2, § 2. Both the federal act and the state act contemplate that a person operating a commercial motor vehicle will have only one

• license. See, e.g., 49 U.S.C. app. § 2701; V.T.C.S. art.
  6687b-2, § 4; see also 49 C.F.R. § 383.21. Section 2708(a) (14) of the federal act requires that a state permit a qualified driver holding a commercial motor vehicle license from another state to operate commercial motor vehicles within its boundaries. —. p. 6514

Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr. - Page 9 (JM-1226)

commercial motor vehicles issued in accordance with article 6687b-2) .

Section 17, which took effect April 1, 1990, provides that the department may issue nonresident commercial driver’s licenses to residents of a foreign jurisdiction "if the United States Secretary of Transportation has determined that the commercial motor vehicle testing and licensing standards in the foreign jurisdiction do not meet the standards established in 49 C.F.R. Part 383."7 A "foreign jurisdiction" is a “jurisdiction other than a state of the United States." V.T.C.S. art. 6687b-2, § 3(18): see also 37 T.A.C. § 16.41 (describing Mexico as a foreign jurisdiction for purposes of article 6687b-2 and stating that a nonresident must satisfy certain requirements). Before issuing such a license, the department must ascertain the practical capacity of discontinuing the license and disqualifying the person "with the same conditions applicable to a commercial driver’s license issued to a resident of this state." V.T.C.S. art. 6687b-2, § 17. We are informed that the department intends to begin issuing nonresident commercial driver’s licenses at the same time as resident commercial driver’s licenses.

The language used in section 17 suggests that the department may not issue nonresident commercial driver’s licenses unless the federal government has issued a formal determination that a foreign jurisdiction’s standards do not satisfy federal requirements. However, a review of all the provisions of the act reveal that the legislature intended that a nonresident obtain a nonresident commercial driver’s license unless the testing and licensing standards of the nonresident’s jurisdiction had been found satisfactory by the federal government. See V.T.C.S. art. 6687b-2, § 9(a) (a person may not drive a commercial motor vehicle unless he possesses a valid commercial driver’s license); id. § 31(a) (mandatory recognition by Texas of certain out-of-state

7. Federal regulations, which take effect April 1,
   1992, require a commercial motor vehicle operator domiciled in a foreign jurisdiction to obtain a nonresident commercial driver’s license from a state that complies with the applicable federal standards if the Department of Trans- portation has determined that the jurisdiction does not have testing and licensing standards in accordance with or similar to the applicable federal regulations. 49 C.F.R.
   § 383.23(b).

=
p. 6515

Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr. - Page 10 (JM-1226)

licenses upon recognition by federal government of issuer’s standards). Unless Texas can issue nonresident commercial driver’s licenses pending a determination of satisfactory standards by the federal government, nonresident operators of commercial motor vehicles may be placed in the difficult position of needing commercial driver’s licenses without a means for acquiring such licenses. Given the importance of commercial traffic along Texas borders, it is doubtful the legislature intended to place nonresident operators in such a position. Thus, we construe section 17 as authorizing the issuance of nonresident commercial driver’s licenses unless the federal government has determined that the standards of the nonresident’s jurisdiction meet applicable federal requirements.

Section 31(a) of article 6687b-2, also effective April 1, 1990, establishes two bases for reciprocal recognition of licenses obtained outside Texas. First, a person may drive a commercial motor vehicle in Texas if he has a valid commercial driver’s license or commercial driver learner’s permit issued by another state in accordance with the applicable federal standards. Since section 3(3) defines commercial driver’s licenses as licenses issued in accordance with article 6687b-2, the phrase as used in section 31(a) obviously refers to commercial driver’s licenses as defined in and issued under other states’ laws.

The federal Commercial Motor Vehicle Safety Act of 1986 anticipates that all of the states will eventually have in effect statutes similar to article 6687b-2 and will recognize commercial driver’s licenses issued by other states. 49 U.S.C. app. § 2708. Federal regulations adopted under the federal act also anticipate that all states will recognize commercial driver’s licenses issued by other states. 49 C.F.R. § 383.73(h).

For two reasons, we believe it is appropriate to interpret section 31(a) in light of the provisions of the federal act and regulations. First, such an interpretation effectuates the single license requirement of the state and federal commercial driver’s licenses acts. See 49 U.S.C. app. § 2701; V.T.C.S. art. 6687b-2, § 4(a). Second, that interpretation enhances the effectiveness of the nationwide information system that the federal act establishes for purposes of tracking the driving record of all commercial drivers. See, e.g., 49 U.S.C. app. § 2706 (computerized system for licensing and disqualification of commercial drivers based on possession of single licenses). Thus, we conclude that if a Mexican operator of a commercial motor vehicle as defined in article 6687b-2 obtains a nonresident

p. 6516

Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr. - Page 11 (JM-1226)

commercial driver’s license from another state, that license is entitled to recognition in Texas in accordance with section 31(a), and that operator is not required to obtain a Texas nonresident commercial driver’s license.

Section 31(a) also provides that a person may drive a commercial motor vehicle as defined by article 6687b-2 in Texas if that person has a valid commercial driver’s license issued by a foreign jurisdiction for which the United States Department of Transportation has made a determination that the jurisdiction’s testing and licensing standards satisfy certain federal requirements.8 While we have confirmed that the federal government has determined that Canada’s standards satisfy the applicable requirements, we are not aware of such a determination with regard to Mexico’s standards. See 49 C.F.R. § 383.23(b) n.1 (effective December 29, 1988, certain Canadian licenses accepted instead of nonresident commercial licenses in accordance with single license requirement); see also 53 Fed. Reg. 27634 (July 21, 1988) (Mexican standards undergoing analysis).

Until the federal government makes a determination that the testing and licensing standards of Mexico satisfy the

applicable federal requirements, a Mexican operator of a commercial motor vehicle as defined in article 6687b-2 must obtain a driver’s license as required by state law. Prior

to the department’s issuance of commercial driver’s licenses, including nonresident commercial driver’s licenses, a Mexican resident may operate a commercial motor vehicle as defined in article 6687b-2 if he has either a

8. According to section 31(a) the following conditions
   must also be satisfied:

(1) the person’s license or permit [issued by the foreign jurisdiction] is appropriate for the class of vehicle being driven and is not suspended, revoked, or canceled;

(2) the person is not disqualified from driving a commercial motor vehicle or subject to an out-of- service order; and

(3) the person has not been domiciled in this state for more than 30 days.

p. 6517

Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr. - Page 12 (JM-1226)

license appropriate for the class of vehicle being driven that is issued in accordance with article 6687b or a nonresident commercial driver’s license issued by another state that is entitled to recognition in Texas in accordance with section 31(a). After the date on which the department begins issuance of nonresident commercial driver’s licenses, a Mexican operator of a vehicle within the scope of article 6687b-2 must possess either a nonresident commercial driver’s license issued by Texas or one issued by another state that is entitled to recognition in Texas. If a Mexican operator of commercial motor vehicles as defined in article 6687b-2 acquires a license under article 6687b before the department begins issuance of nonresident commercial driver’s licenses, he may continue to use that license until it expires or is suspended, revoked, or cancelled.

SUMMARY

Absent a reciprocal arrangement between Mexico and Texas or the United States for the recognition of commercial driver’s licenses or any Mexican legislation allowing licensed Texas commercial drivers to operate their vehicles on Mexican highways without ob- taining local licenses, an exemption under section 3(e) of article 6687b is not avail- able from that act’s licensing provisions for Mexican operators of motor vehicles within the scope of article 6687b that are used for commercial purposes. Thus, Mexican operators

of such vehicles must obtain licenses in accordance with article 6687b.

Until the federal government determines that Mexico’s testing and licensing standards satisfy applicable federal requirements, a Mexican operator of a commercial motor vehicle within the scope of the Texas Commercial Driver’s License Act, V.T.C.S. article 6687b-2, must obtain a Texas driver’s license as required by state law. Until the Department of Public Safety begins issuance of nonresident commercial driver’s licenses under article 6687b-2, such an operator should obtain a license appropriate for the class of vehicles being driven that is issued in accordance with article 6687b or a nonresident commercial driver’s license issued by another state that is entitled to

p. 6518

Honorable Benjamin Euresti, Jr. - Page 13 (JM-1226) recognition in Texas in accordance with section 31(a) of article 6687b-2. After the date on which the department begins issuance of nonresident commercial driver’s licenses, such an operator must possess either a nonresident commercial driver’s license issued by Texas or by another state that is entitled to recognition in Texas. However, if a Mexican operator acquires a license under article 6687b before that date, he may continue to use that license until it expires or is suspended, revoked, or cancelled.

Very truly yours,

JIM MATTOX
Attorney General of Texas
MARY KELLER
First Assistant Attorney General
LOU MCCREARY
Executive Assistant Attorney General JUDGE ZOLLIE STEAKLEY Special Assistant Attorney General RENEA HICKS Special Assistant Attorney General RICK GILPIN Chairman, Opinion Committee Prepared by Celeste A. Baker Assistant Attorney General p. 6519